![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
how do I know if I need to culminating?
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Do you got it up?
-- To reply, remove the "z" if one appears in my address "jojo" wrote in message . com... how do I know if I need to culminating? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
No problem, if you need to bad enough, you'll have a wet dream....
Clear, Dark, Steady Skies! (And considerate neighbors!!!) |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 17 Sep 2003 22:10:58 GMT, "jojo" ...reflected:
how do I know if I need to culminating? I take it that you have a Newtonian; a reflector; mirrors? Tell us the brand, and the diameter of the primary mirror/lens. Alan |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Oh, jojo meant "collimate"??
Sorry for what I thought was meant... Clear, Dark, Steady Skies! (And considerate neighbors!!!) |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
For starters, look into the eyepiece hole (I am assuming
a reflector telescope here, with 2 mirrors) without an eyepiece, and see if the complete reflection of the primary mirror is reflected off the secondary mirror up thru the eyepiece hole, AND if the secondary mirror is centered in your eyepiece hole, which you can tell by looking at the secondary holders (spider) mount. They should be roughly equidistant in length. If its not centered nearly perfectly, then you are probably out of collimation....for starters. Clear Skies, Tom W. jojo wrote: how do I know if I need to culminating? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Alan W. Craft" wrote in message ... On Wed, 17 Sep 2003 22:10:58 GMT, "jojo" ....reflected: how do I know if I need to culminating? I take it that you have a Newtonian; a reflector; mirrors? Tell us the brand, and the diameter of the primary mirror/lens. Alan Alan, It's a Bushnell (this is where I insert justification. It was a gift. It is better than nothing) 675x4.5" Reflector Focal length (mm) 900 thanks.... jojo |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "jojo" wrote in message . com... how do I know if I need to culminating? Sorry folks. A hasty post that spell check took over! jojo |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "bwhiting" wrote in message ... For starters, look into the eyepiece hole (I am assuming a reflector telescope here, with 2 mirrors) without an eyepiece, and see if the complete reflection of the primary mirror is reflected off the secondary mirror up thru the eyepiece hole, AND if the secondary mirror is centered in your eyepiece hole, which you can tell by looking at the secondary holders (spider) mount. They should be roughly equidistant in length. If its not centered nearly perfectly, then you are probably out of collimation....for starters. Clear Skies, Tom W. Thanks Tom. I'll look at those tonight... jojo |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2003-09-18 21:56 +0900, jojo wrote:
It's a Bushnell (this is where I insert justification. It was a gift. It is better than nothing) It most assuredly is, jojo. My first scope, a Nashica M100 50mm refractor, ranks near the bottom of the heap of dept. store junk, yet it still comes out to play from time to time. No need to apologize about your scope. The best scope is the one you own and use. trane -- //------------------------------------------------------------ // Trane Francks Tokyo, Japan // Practice random kindness and senseless acts of beauty. // http://mp3.com/trane_francks/ |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Moon key to space future? | James White | Policy | 90 | January 6th 04 04:29 PM |
ODDS AGAINST EVOLUTION (You listenin', t.o.?) | Lord Blacklight | Astronomy Misc | 56 | November 21st 03 02:45 PM |
Newbie question about observing mars | Mike Y. | Amateur Astronomy | 10 | August 24th 03 03:45 AM |
PX question | Bored Huge Krill | Astronomy Misc | 4 | August 10th 03 02:54 AM |