![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I am missing something here. I'm a beginner and am still trying to split
the double-double in Epsilon Lyrae. "Skywatching" by David Levy tells me that the slightest optical aid shows two stars of equal magnitude just west of Vega and that a 4-inch scope at 100X splits these into a double each. "Turn Left at Orion" says essentially the same thing. I put Vega at the top of the field of view in 10x50 binos and at the bottom of the FOV, generally west of Vega, are two stars of equal magnitude. I locate these in my 8-inch Dob and run them up to 100X, 171X, 240X and still no split that I can tell. Do I have the wrong pair or are they not that simple? I have a copy of the Will Tirion SkyAtlas 2000 that I am still figuring out how to use. As best I can tell, I am seeing the two stars at: chart 8, one of the stars is at approx 19h15m RA, +39d10m decl and the two stars are numbered 20 and 21. Is this pair the double-double? Thanks. -- ---- Joe S. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Joe S." wrote in message ... I am missing something here. I'm a beginner and am still trying to split the double-double in Epsilon Lyrae. Both doubles are very tight, and at a right angle to each other. I couldn't see them either when I first started. I routinely nail stuff today that I couldn't see at all 20 years ago - and you *know* my vision isn't any better! 8) ---- Dave Boll http://www.daveboll.com/ |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Joe S." wrote in message ... I am missing something here. I'm a beginner and am still trying to split the double-double in Epsilon Lyrae. "Skywatching" by David Levy tells me that the slightest optical aid shows two stars of equal magnitude just west of Vega and that a 4-inch scope at 100X splits these into a double each. "Turn Left at Orion" says essentially the same thing. I put Vega at the top of the field of view in 10x50 binos and at the bottom of the FOV, generally west of Vega, are two stars of equal magnitude. I locate these in my 8-inch Dob and run them up to 100X, 171X, 240X and still no split that I can tell. Do I have the wrong pair or are they not that simple? I have a copy of the Will Tirion SkyAtlas 2000 that I am still figuring out how to use. As best I can tell, I am seeing the two stars at: chart 8, one of the stars is at approx 19h15m RA, +39d10m decl and the two stars are numbered 20 and 21. Is this pair the double-double? West?..I always go to the 11 o'clock position to the two stars that look like 2 headlights. I can just split them at 180 X's. This is barely a split however and not what I would call clean with an 80mm... |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Joe S. wrote:
I am missing something here. I'm a beginner and am still trying to split the double-double in Epsilon Lyrae. "Skywatching" by David Levy tells me that the slightest optical aid shows two stars of equal magnitude just west of Vega and that a 4-inch scope at 100X splits these into a double each. "Turn Left at Orion" says essentially the same thing. I put Vega at the top of the field of view in 10x50 binos and at the bottom of the FOV, generally west of Vega, are two stars of equal magnitude. I locate these in my 8-inch Dob and run them up to 100X, 171X, 240X and still no split that I can tell. Do I have the wrong pair or are they not that simple? Epsilon Lyra is precisely considered a good "informal" test of your scope's collimation -- if you can resolve the double-double, then collimation is fine. If not, then either collimation is not fine, or the seeing is not fine at the moment you're seeing it. I'm not sure I follow your explanation (west of Vega? if my visual memory doesn't fail me, I believe epsilon is located east of Vega); but still, I think you are seeing the right pair -- if both fit within the FOV at more than 150X, then it should be the right pair. An ASCII-art of Lyra showing where they a * X x x x x The capital X is Vega, and the asterisk (the * character) is your double-double. Again, I'm doing this from "visual memory", so it is possible that I got it wrong -- but usually it's pretty obvious with binoculars, and it's equally obvious with your telescope's viewfinder (should be a 8x or 10x I guess). My guess is that either the seeing conditions were not good, or your collimation is not perfect. A third possibility is that your eyesight is less-than-optimal (I can not know if that is the case, but good eyesight certainly plays a role). With an 8 inches, I believe your eye has to make an effort to tell the four stars (at least that was the case the *one* occasion where I could see them through my 8 inches Newtonian). Stay tuned, as I'm sure some much more experienced people will give you valuable hints, and possibly correct me if I've gotten some details wrong. Cheers, Carlos -- |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Joe S. wrote:
I put Vega at the top of the field of view in 10x50 binos and at the bottom of the FOV, generally west of Vega, are two stars of equal magnitude. I locate these in my 8-inch Dob and run them up to 100X, 171X, 240X and still no split that I can tell. Do I have the wrong pair or are they not that simple? You can confuse zeta Lyrae with epsilon Lyrae. Through the finder epsilon is a wide, equal pair but zeta is a tight, uneqal pair. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
MANY THANKS to all for your comments and encouragement.
East, West, what's the difference :-) It's up there somewhere. Based on what everyone has said, I have been looking at the correct pair of stars. For the past two weeks I've been hauling my dob around to public Mars viewings. I dragged it out a few minutes ago and checked collimation -- which was spot on two weeks ago. Well, it's not on any longer -- must have bounced it around a bit too much. I'll let it cool down tonight, collimate it, then take a shot at E Lyrae. -- ---- Joe S. "Joe S." wrote in message ... I am missing something here. I'm a beginner and am still trying to split the double-double in Epsilon Lyrae. "Skywatching" by David Levy tells me that the slightest optical aid shows two stars of equal magnitude just west of Vega and that a 4-inch scope at 100X splits these into a double each. "Turn Left at Orion" says essentially the same thing. I put Vega at the top of the field of view in 10x50 binos and at the bottom of the FOV, generally west of Vega, are two stars of equal magnitude. I locate these in my 8-inch Dob and run them up to 100X, 171X, 240X and still no split that I can tell. Do I have the wrong pair or are they not that simple? I have a copy of the Will Tirion SkyAtlas 2000 that I am still figuring out how to use. As best I can tell, I am seeing the two stars at: chart 8, one of the stars is at approx 19h15m RA, +39d10m decl and the two stars are numbered 20 and 21. Is this pair the double-double? Thanks. -- ---- Joe S. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 1 Sep 2003 10:05:02 -0400, "Joe S."
wrote: I am missing something here. I'm a beginner and am still trying to split the double-double in Epsilon Lyrae. "Skywatching" by David Levy tells me that the slightest optical aid shows two stars of equal magnitude just west of Vega and that a 4-inch scope at 100X splits these into a double each. "Turn Left at Orion" says essentially the same thing. I put Vega at the top of the field of view in 10x50 binos and at the bottom of the FOV, generally west of Vega, are two stars of equal magnitude. I locate these in my 8-inch Dob and run them up to 100X, 171X, 240X and still no split that I can tell. Do I have the wrong pair or are they not that simple? I have a copy of the Will Tirion SkyAtlas 2000 that I am still figuring out how to use. As best I can tell, I am seeing the two stars at: chart 8, one of the stars is at approx 19h15m RA, +39d10m decl and the two stars are numbered 20 and 21. Is this pair the double-double? Thanks. It sounds like you are looking too far away from Vega. If your 10x50 binoculars have a 5 degree field of view, and if you center Vega in the middle of the binocular field, Epsilon Lyrae should be to the West of Vega, well within the binocular field (about 1.6 degrees West of Vega.) Look at this picture I made from 'Earth Centered Universe': http://home.swbell.net/kh6idf/elyra.GIF In binoculars you can see what looks like a double, easily split in 10x50 binoculars. They are both about magnitude 5, and should be really obvious, there are no other bright double stars in that binocular field. You should be able to split each one into two at around 100X,-150X and you will know you have the right ones if they look like this: * * * * One of the doubles is more or less at right angles to the other. It requires fairly good seeing to split them because each pair has about a 2.5 arc-second spacing between the stars. If the seeing is bad, like worse than 3 arc-seconds or so the two close stars in each pair would just look like one big fuzzy star. Also your dobsonian should be well-collimated. I've seen mis-collimated C-8's that can't split them at all, but even a 60mm refractor can split them if the lens is good. A decent 8 inch dob should split them really easily. If the seeing is good, the more power the better. Once you find them, the 240X eyepice should give a nice view. good luck, Fred Houston, TX Fred Houston, TX remove capitals from email address to reply |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Joe S." wrote in message
As best I can tell, I am seeing the two stars at: chart 8, one of the stars is at approx 19h15m RA, +39d10m decl and the two stars are numbered 20 and 21. Is this pair the double-double? NO Joe, those are not the right stars. You want 4 e1 and 5 e2, much closer to Vega. Good luck, edz |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Take a look when Vega is transiting, Epsilon Lyrae is a little
northeast of Vega. Seeing two stars is easy. Splitting Epsilon Lyrae into four stars requires a night of reasonably good seeing and a telescope that is well collimated, well cooled down, and has reasonably good optics. Small refractors can often easy split Epsilon Lyrae but the Newt set up a few feet away can have a hard time showing more than two elongated blobs because of the problems mentioned above. Good luck, Rich Joe S. wrote in message ... I am missing something here. I'm a beginner and am still trying to split the double-double in Epsilon Lyrae. "Skywatching" by David Levy tells me that the slightest optical aid shows two stars of equal magnitude just west of Vega and that a 4-inch scope at 100X splits these into a double each. "Turn Left at Orion" says essentially the same thing. I put Vega at the top of the field of view in 10x50 binos and at the bottom of the FOV, generally west of Vega, are two stars of equal magnitude. I locate these in my 8-inch Dob and run them up to 100X, 171X, 240X and still no split that I can tell. Do I have the wrong pair or are they not that simple? I have a copy of the Will Tirion SkyAtlas 2000 that I am still figuring out how to use. As best I can tell, I am seeing the two stars at: chart 8, one of the stars is at approx 19h15m RA, +39d10m decl and the two stars are numbered 20 and 21. Is this pair the double-double? Thanks. -- ---- Joe S. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I split it tonight with my N11 (no great feat), with a 140x (19mm Panoptic.
I needed 200x (14 mm Radian) to get black sky between the close doubles. My scope was a little miscollimated, doubles are great for pointing that out. I recollimated a bit at 580x and went back to the double/double. Still needed 200x to see black between them but the views were a bit more pleasing. Must be something to split these with a 3" refractor ... "Jon Isaacs" wrote in message ... Joe: Not sure you are looking at the right pair. There are a couple of pairs in the neighborhood, easy to get the wrong one. These are close pairs and require the right conditions to split them cleanly. The most important factor is the "seeing"- the stability of the atmosphere. If the seeing is not good them these will be difficult to split. Some nights the stars are big and round and it is obvious the seeing is bad, the next night everything might just be hunky dory and the stars are tight and you can split them nicely. Collimation is important, it could be a problem but I have split the double double some pretty miscollimated scopes. Cool down is the third factor, it the mirror is not cooled down, splitting the double-double may be difficult. Look at Polaris at high magnification, what does it look like, both in and out of focus. In focus, is it a tight round point/dot with sharp diffraction spikes. If so, then you are probably ready for the double-double. Make sure you are looking at the right pair. I have picked the wrong pair on occasion, it does not split well. jon |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Missing Link Sought in Planetary Evolution (SIRTF) | Ron Baalke | Astronomy Misc | 0 | October 20th 03 10:52 PM |
Missing Link Sought in Planetary Evolution (SIRTF) | Ron Baalke | Science | 0 | October 20th 03 10:51 PM |
Ned Wright's TBBNH Page (C) | Bjoern Feuerbacher | Astronomy Misc | 24 | October 2nd 03 06:50 PM |
Electric Gravity&Instantaneous Light | ralph sansbury | Astronomy Misc | 8 | August 31st 03 02:53 AM |
Zeroing in on T Lyrae | bwhiting | Amateur Astronomy | 4 | August 2nd 03 03:18 PM |