Proton Radius Cannot Be Derived From Standard Model

At sci.physics.research, theoretical physicist AN commented:

"Because the proton is so much bigger, it makes a much better target
than an electron. The proton charge radius is known experimentally,
but cannot at present be derived from the standard model. "

Although the "standard model" cannot "at present" be usd to derive a
definitive value for the proton charge radius, there is a new
cosmological paradigm called the Discrete Self-Similar Cosmological
Paradigm that has already derived the proton's charge radius from
first principles.

The DSSCP uses the Kerr-Newman solution of General Relativity, a bit
of Quantum Mechanics (quantization of angular momentum), and the
self-evident discrete self-similarity of nature to correctly retrodict
the
radius and mass of the proton.

You can find this result and quite a bit more in the following paper,
which has just been published in the Journal of Cosmology, Vol. 6,
2010.
http://arxiv.org/ftp/astro-ph/papers/0701/0701006.pdf

Why can't the monumental Ptolemaic glass-bead game known as the
"standard model" derive something as basic as the proton's charge
radius? Why can the DSSCP accomplish this task with such ease?

I think I know the answers to these two questions, but I am hoping
you
will confirm those answers for yourselves.

Do we need a new unified paradigm for all of nature, from the
smallest
elementary particles to the largest superclusters of galaxies? Oh,
yeah!

RLO
www.amherst.edu/~rloldershaw