![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 23, 1:23*am, Brad Guth wrote:
On Mar 22, 7:15*am, William Mook wrote: On Mar 19, 3:04*pm, Brad Guth wrote: On Mar 18, 6:24*pm, William Mook wrote: On Mar 18, 3:10*pm, Brad Guth wrote: On Mar 17, 5:29*am, William Mook wrote: On Mar 16, 6:05*pm, Brad Guth wrote: On Mar 16, 9:54*am, William Mook wrote: It bears repeating, that we have the capability of creating a satellite and launching it from Earth that navigates to 3 million km from the sun. *These satellites hover above the sun and beam 40 billion watts and more of useable laser energy anywhere we like it in the inner solar system. *This much collimated laser energy is sufficient to retrieve 1.2 million tons per year from the asteroid belt and deliver it safely to Earth orbit. *Its also sufficient to loft 100 ton payloads from Earth to Mars and back at 1/3 gee in one to three weeks depending on the position of the planets involved booting off Earth and Mars with laser powered rockets and boosting between worlds with laser light sails using methods first described by Bob Forward. This same technology can be deployed around nearby stars using staged laser light sails. *Once counter-propagating laser beams are established around distant stars, regular transport between those star systems at 1/3 gee is possible. How about getting China or India on your side? (obviously nothing American gives a puck) *~ BG When I was a graduate student at the Ohio State University, Chen Wen- Tsuen from National Tsinghua University. Chen was Dean of the College of Electrical Engineering , National Chair of the Republic of China, IEEE Fellow, IEEE Technical Achievement Award winner. *Chen regarded Kraus very highly. *He visited Columbus, Ohio when John Kraus arranged to give an award to Grote Reber, creator of the world's first Radio Telescope. Chen toured the OSU 'Big Ear' and hung out at Kraus' farm. *Chen was enamoured of the achievements of Kraus who wrote Electromagnetics and Antennas and Radio Astronomy - classic definitive volumes on these subjects whose text was the core of the curriculum of many courses at Tsinghua University. During our extended visits I had the opportunity to 'brainstorm' with Chen and we formed a friendship. *When he left Ohio I gave him a copy of O'Neill's HIGH FRONTIER and a copy of NASA's Summer Study results on Space Colonization. *Something I prized highly and felt would be useful to him. *He eagerly accepted them, and actually used them to teach a few courses in advanced engineering at Tsinghua. http://www.nss.org/settlement/nasa/C...x.htmlhttp://v... So, I think the ideas are out there, and gestating. *The Chinese, like the Americans, have to process the opportunities and understand fully their importance and utility. *Engineering leadership in this field hasn't done well. *It seems that the very moment of their greatest achievement, the greatest proponents of real progress in space are cut down. *Which is unfortunate. *Leo Szilard, JFK, Krolev, vonBraun, O'Neill all could have done far more than they did, but were hobbled by bureaucratic concerns or died at the moment of their greatest power. Someone or more likely, several people, in China and India, Pakistan or Iran are reading and re-reading the studies and technical documents available to them regarding space travel, and using their own skills and knowledge and contributing their own idea. *These people will emerge and lead their nation and the world into a new age- barring any unfortunate misfortune. We'll likely accuse them of having WMD and hiding OBL, giving us enough false justifications to nuke them, supposedly before they nuke us. Meanwhile, even though we really can't afford squat, it seems we're planning on putting our biggest and best WMD (meaning nukes) into LEO. At the bankrupt and anything but failsafe rate we're going, and with nothing of any real energy technology breakthroughs making us any better off or even as good as anyone else, it seems going with China or India can't be half bad. India just gave their fly-by-rocket and related technology wizards a 38% boost in public funding, not to mention whatever private industry that's going to slide their way. *Our public finding of NASA and DARPA isn't hardly covering their annual COL and retirement perks. *~ BG http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JOZ7Cpnq-Gw I like the verse below - it says a lot, and how intense personal relationships trump the larger things that are happening in the world- i was thrown before the court of canes tossed my soul to the furnace flames where all my heros had been slain, exiled, or put in prison because they rose above the mess and because their power posed a threat and because they spoke of something else when everybody else didn't the music fills the space between the deities and the prophecies of our bodies pressed endlessly silent in the sand she looks at me so fearlessly and i take it all too seriously but it all becomes so clear to me and makes me understand So you understand that we're being systematically screwed over, but it seems your quality of life is sufficiently protected and otherwise prepared to live with this form of anti-technology domination that's enforced by those of Big Energy and their puppets in public office. I'm not sure that's a good plan, unless you plan on out-living most everyone that's getting in your way. How about your going directly to Steven Chu and our DoE with at least one of your best thought-out and prototyped plans of providing us with your green hydrogen, plus offering whatever spare electrons that can help feed our inadequate national power grids at the least possible cost? With a relatively cheap supply of Mook hydrogen that most everyone could use, or even hydrogen peroxide that's also in high global demand, what could possibly go wrong? *~ BG Your quality of life is determined by the quality of the people in it, not the quality of things. * So, yeah, I have a very good quality of life. *Who plans to die? *I don't. You and those immortal seans must get along quite nicely. So, why can't you directly chat or at least remote think-tank with Steven Chu? Should I make an introduction on your behalf? *~ BG I have said for nearly 20 years now, and continue to say, the less you have to post in response to what I say, the better off we'll all be. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 29, 10:25*am, William Mook wrote:
On Mar 23, 1:23*am, Brad Guth wrote: On Mar 22, 7:15*am, William Mook wrote: On Mar 19, 3:04*pm, Brad Guth wrote: On Mar 18, 6:24*pm, William Mook wrote: On Mar 18, 3:10*pm, Brad Guth wrote: On Mar 17, 5:29*am, William Mook wrote: On Mar 16, 6:05*pm, Brad Guth wrote: On Mar 16, 9:54*am, William Mook wrote: It bears repeating, that we have the capability of creating a satellite and launching it from Earth that navigates to 3 million km from the sun. *These satellites hover above the sun and beam 40 billion watts and more of useable laser energy anywhere we like it in the inner solar system. *This much collimated laser energy is sufficient to retrieve 1.2 million tons per year from the asteroid belt and deliver it safely to Earth orbit. *Its also sufficient to loft 100 ton payloads from Earth to Mars and back at 1/3 gee in one to three weeks depending on the position of the planets involved booting off Earth and Mars with laser powered rockets and boosting between worlds with laser light sails using methods first described by Bob Forward. This same technology can be deployed around nearby stars using staged laser light sails. *Once counter-propagating laser beams are established around distant stars, regular transport between those star systems at 1/3 gee is possible. How about getting China or India on your side? (obviously nothing American gives a puck) *~ BG When I was a graduate student at the Ohio State University, Chen Wen- Tsuen from National Tsinghua University. Chen was Dean of the College of Electrical Engineering , National Chair of the Republic of China, IEEE Fellow, IEEE Technical Achievement Award winner. *Chen regarded Kraus very highly. *He visited Columbus, Ohio when John Kraus arranged to give an award to Grote Reber, creator of the world's first Radio Telescope. Chen toured the OSU 'Big Ear' and hung out at Kraus' farm. *Chen was enamoured of the achievements of Kraus who wrote Electromagnetics and Antennas and Radio Astronomy - classic definitive volumes on these subjects whose text was the core of the curriculum of many courses at Tsinghua University. During our extended visits I had the opportunity to 'brainstorm' with Chen and we formed a friendship. *When he left Ohio I gave him a copy of O'Neill's HIGH FRONTIER and a copy of NASA's Summer Study results on Space Colonization. *Something I prized highly and felt would be useful to him. *He eagerly accepted them, and actually used them to teach a few courses in advanced engineering at Tsinghua. http://www.nss.org/settlement/nasa/C...x.htmlhttp://v... So, I think the ideas are out there, and gestating. *The Chinese, like the Americans, have to process the opportunities and understand fully their importance and utility. *Engineering leadership in this field hasn't done well. *It seems that the very moment of their greatest achievement, the greatest proponents of real progress in space are cut down. *Which is unfortunate. *Leo Szilard, JFK, Krolev, vonBraun, O'Neill all could have done far more than they did, but were hobbled by bureaucratic concerns or died at the moment of their greatest power. Someone or more likely, several people, in China and India, Pakistan or Iran are reading and re-reading the studies and technical documents available to them regarding space travel, and using their own skills and knowledge and contributing their own idea. *These people will emerge and lead their nation and the world into a new age- barring any unfortunate misfortune. We'll likely accuse them of having WMD and hiding OBL, giving us enough false justifications to nuke them, supposedly before they nuke us. Meanwhile, even though we really can't afford squat, it seems we're planning on putting our biggest and best WMD (meaning nukes) into LEO. At the bankrupt and anything but failsafe rate we're going, and with nothing of any real energy technology breakthroughs making us any better off or even as good as anyone else, it seems going with China or India can't be half bad. India just gave their fly-by-rocket and related technology wizards a 38% boost in public funding, not to mention whatever private industry that's going to slide their way. *Our public finding of NASA and DARPA isn't hardly covering their annual COL and retirement perks. *~ BG http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JOZ7Cpnq-Gw I like the verse below - it says a lot, and how intense personal relationships trump the larger things that are happening in the world- i was thrown before the court of canes tossed my soul to the furnace flames where all my heros had been slain, exiled, or put in prison because they rose above the mess and because their power posed a threat and because they spoke of something else when everybody else didn't the music fills the space between the deities and the prophecies of our bodies pressed endlessly silent in the sand she looks at me so fearlessly and i take it all too seriously but it all becomes so clear to me and makes me understand So you understand that we're being systematically screwed over, but it seems your quality of life is sufficiently protected and otherwise prepared to live with this form of anti-technology domination that's enforced by those of Big Energy and their puppets in public office. I'm not sure that's a good plan, unless you plan on out-living most everyone that's getting in your way. How about your going directly to Steven Chu and our DoE with at least one of your best thought-out and prototyped plans of providing us with your green hydrogen, plus offering whatever spare electrons that can help feed our inadequate national power grids at the least possible cost? With a relatively cheap supply of Mook hydrogen that most everyone could use, or even hydrogen peroxide that's also in high global demand, what could possibly go wrong? *~ BG Your quality of life is determined by the quality of the people in it, not the quality of things. * So, yeah, I have a very good quality of life. *Who plans to die? *I don't. You and those immortal seans must get along quite nicely. So, why can't you directly chat or at least remote think-tank with Steven Chu? Should I make an introduction on your behalf? *~ BG I have said for nearly 20 years now, and continue to say, the less you have to post in response to what I say, the better off we'll all be. Then you have 10 years advantage on whatever I've contributed. So, how many decades of unobstructed R&D and media hype does Mook require? Why are you avoiding Steven Chu? (he reads as being a very nice and intelligent sort of person that shouldn't have any problems understanding what you have to sell, and he's even well connected to the guy most in charge of our NASA, namely President BHO) ~ BG |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 30, 4:40*am, Fred J. McCall wrote:
William Mook wrote: :On Mar 23, 1:23*am, Brad Guth wrote: snip : :I have said for nearly 20 years now, and continue to say, the less you :have to post in response to what I say, the better off we'll all be. : That thought can be simplified to "The less you post (either of you), the better off we'll all be." -- "Ordinarily he is insane. But he has lucid moments when he is *only stupid." * * * * * * * * * * * * * * -- Heinrich Heine In other words, you're either a Rothschild, Jewish or at least Semite worthy. What's your best alternative for getting us safely to/from Mars? ~ BG |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 30, 8:40*am, Fred J. McCall wrote:
William Mook wrote: :On Mar 23, 1:23*am, Brad Guth wrote: snip : :I have said for nearly 20 years now, and continue to say, the less you :have to post in response to what I say, the better off we'll all be. : That thought can be simplified to "The less you post (either of you), the better off we'll all be." -- "Ordinarily he is insane. But he has lucid moments when he is *only stupid." * * * * * * * * * * * * * * -- Heinrich Heine I don't care how much Brad posts, I just wish he'd stop cock blocking me. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 30, 2:49*pm, Brad Guth wrote:
On Mar 30, 4:40*am, Fred J. McCall wrote: William Mook wrote: :On Mar 23, 1:23*am, Brad Guth wrote: snip : :I have said for nearly 20 years now, and continue to say, the less you :have to post in response to what I say, the better off we'll all be. : That thought can be simplified to "The less you post (either of you), the better off we'll all be." -- "Ordinarily he is insane. But he has lucid moments when he is *only stupid." * * * * * * * * * * * * * * -- Heinrich Heine In other words, you're either a Rothschild, Jewish or at least Semite worthy. What's your best alternative for getting us safely to/from Mars? *~ BG In 1944 Stanislaw Ulam said he could build an engine that not only could destroy downtown Chicago, but he could also build an engine that could transport downtown Chicago safely to the surface of Mars. http://www.flickr.com/photos/xeni/272457786/ An 8 million ton ship is quite capable of carrying 1 million people and requires 3,000 tons of bombs. Fusion bombs, triggered by nuclear triggers permits our current inventory of weapons grade fissile material to support the operation of 10,000 such ships with a total of 10 billion berths throughout the solar system. At $0.50 per kg (the price of steel in quantity) these ships cost $4 billion each so 10,000 cost $40 trillion - about 9 months worth of global production - and equal to what we've spent on warfare in the 20th century. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 31, 2:40*pm, William Mook wrote:
On Mar 30, 8:40*am, Fred J. McCall wrote: William Mook wrote: :On Mar 23, 1:23*am, Brad Guth wrote: snip : :I have said for nearly 20 years now, and continue to say, the less you :have to post in response to what I say, the better off we'll all be. : That thought can be simplified to "The less you post (either of you), the better off we'll all be." -- "Ordinarily he is insane. But he has lucid moments when he is *only stupid." * * * * * * * * * * * * * * -- Heinrich Heine I don't care how much Brad posts, I just wish he'd stop cock blocking me. You mean there's any other person or group on Usenet that'll bother to openly support you as half or even a tenth as well as I have? I've offered 50/50 matching funds for promoting some but not all of your ideas. Has anyone else offered anything better than squat? How much public support has Fred J. McCall offered, if he were in charge? ~ BG |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 31, 2:48*pm, William Mook wrote:
On Mar 30, 2:49*pm, Brad Guth wrote: On Mar 30, 4:40*am, Fred J. McCall wrote: William Mook wrote: :On Mar 23, 1:23*am, Brad Guth wrote: snip : :I have said for nearly 20 years now, and continue to say, the less you :have to post in response to what I say, the better off we'll all be. : That thought can be simplified to "The less you post (either of you), the better off we'll all be." -- "Ordinarily he is insane. But he has lucid moments when he is *only stupid." * * * * * * * * * * * * * * -- Heinrich Heine In other words, you're either a Rothschild, Jewish or at least Semite worthy. What's your best alternative for getting us safely to/from Mars? *~ BG In 1944 Stanislaw Ulam said he could build an engine that not only could destroy downtown Chicago, but he could also build an engine that could transport downtown Chicago safely to the surface of Mars. http://www.flickr.com/photos/xeni/272457786/ An 8 million ton ship is quite capable of carrying 1 million people and requires 3,000 tons of bombs. *Fusion bombs, triggered by nuclear triggers permits our current inventory of weapons grade fissile material to support the operation of 10,000 such ships with a total of 10 billion berths throughout the solar system. * At $0.50 per kg (the price of steel in quantity) these ships cost $4 billion each so 10,000 cost $40 trillion - about 9 months worth of global production - and equal to what we've spent on warfare in the 20th century. According to "The Onion", Americans spent, wasted and/or having blown roughly $14 trillion trying to look and act cool each year. http://www.theonion.com/articles/rep...-to-loo,17125/ Btw; what's so great about Mars, other than currently there's not another human or any other form of any soul upon that inert and mostly cold planet? ~ BG |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 31, 7:58*pm, Fred J. McCall wrote:
William Mook wrote: :On Mar 30, 8:40 am, Fred J. McCall wrote: : William Mook wrote: : : :On Mar 23, 1:23 am, Brad Guth wrote: : : snip : : : : :I have said for nearly 20 years now, and continue to say, the less you : :have to post in response to what I say, the better off we'll all be. : : : : That thought can be simplified to "The less you post (either of you), : the better off we'll all be." : : :I don't care how much Brad posts, I just wish he'd stop cock blocking :me. : I didn't say YOU cared, Mookie. *I said that all of us would better off if BOTH of you STFU. -- "Some people get lost in thought because it's such unfamiliar *territory." * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * --G. Behn Why are you devout Semites getting so poofed up and snotty over this topic? ~ BG |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 31, 8:45*pm, Brad Guth wrote:
On Mar 31, 2:48*pm, William Mook wrote: On Mar 30, 2:49*pm, Brad Guth wrote: On Mar 30, 4:40*am, Fred J. McCall wrote: William Mook wrote: :On Mar 23, 1:23*am, Brad Guth wrote: snip : :I have said for nearly 20 years now, and continue to say, the less you :have to post in response to what I say, the better off we'll all be. : That thought can be simplified to "The less you post (either of you), the better off we'll all be." -- "Ordinarily he is insane. But he has lucid moments when he is *only stupid." * * * * * * * * * * * * * * -- Heinrich Heine In other words, you're either a Rothschild, Jewish or at least Semite worthy. What's your best alternative for getting us safely to/from Mars? *~ BG In 1944 Stanislaw Ulam said he could build an engine that not only could destroy downtown Chicago, but he could also build an engine that could transport downtown Chicago safely to the surface of Mars. http://www.flickr.com/photos/xeni/272457786/ An 8 million ton ship is quite capable of carrying 1 million people and requires 3,000 tons of bombs. *Fusion bombs, triggered by nuclear triggers permits our current inventory of weapons grade fissile material to support the operation of 10,000 such ships with a total of 10 billion berths throughout the solar system. * At $0.50 per kg (the price of steel in quantity) these ships cost $4 billion each so 10,000 cost $40 trillion - about 9 months worth of global production - and equal to what we've spent on warfare in the 20th century. According to "The Onion", Americans spent, wasted and/or having blown roughly $14 trillion trying to look and act cool each year. *http://www.theonion.com/articles/rep...nt-annually-on.... Btw; *what's so great about Mars, other than currently there's not another human or any other form of any soul upon that inert and mostly cold planet? *~ BG Robert Zubrin recounts the advantages of settling Mars with current technology in his book CASE FOR MARS. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 31, 8:36*pm, Brad Guth wrote:
On Mar 31, 2:40*pm, William Mook wrote: On Mar 30, 8:40*am, Fred J. McCall wrote: William Mook wrote: :On Mar 23, 1:23*am, Brad Guth wrote: snip : :I have said for nearly 20 years now, and continue to say, the less you :have to post in response to what I say, the better off we'll all be. : That thought can be simplified to "The less you post (either of you), the better off we'll all be." -- "Ordinarily he is insane. But he has lucid moments when he is *only stupid." * * * * * * * * * * * * * * -- Heinrich Heine I don't care how much Brad posts, I just wish he'd stop cock blocking me. You mean there's any other person or group on Usenet that'll bother to openly support you as half or even a tenth as well as I have? I've offered 50/50 matching funds for promoting some but not all of your ideas. *Has anyone else offered anything better than squat? How much public support has Fred J. McCall offered, if he were in charge? *~ BG Brad, if you would care to wire transfer any amount of money over $100,000 into my bank account, I will match whatever actual money you transfer in with my own money, and set up a company to develop MEMS rocket engines, arrange a take-over of Boeing and all the rest. Cheers William |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
One-man-one-way trip to Mars | Pat Flannery | History | 14 | March 9th 08 04:00 PM |
90-day trip to Mars | Roger Hamlett | Misc | 0 | October 22nd 04 09:14 AM |
One Way Trip to Mars? | Nomen Nescio | Space Shuttle | 6 | November 23rd 03 02:46 PM |