A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » History
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Cupola and docking collision?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 24th 10, 07:02 PM posted to sci.space.history
Dr.Colon Oscopy
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 55
Default Cupola and docking collision?

Structure looks pretty rugged, but "spaceglass" is just that. I
haven't seen a lot of info on the retractable window covers. They
appear to be rather thick, (crushable by design? ) and I'm wondering
as to reason for this?. I do not think that the covers are there for
a pressure seal as well as the design does not look robust enough for
this I haven't seen any protocol s on what needs to be done in case
of a threat to the Cupola? Just imagine anogther Progress or coming
Commercial vehicle impact. When Mir was hit I would imagine a lot of
the energy was absorbed by the solar panel before it hit the pressure
hull, hitting dead on is whole other storyh. Anybody know how fast
the retraction and deploy cycles are?..............Doc
  #2  
Old February 24th 10, 08:55 PM posted to sci.space.history
Me
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 489
Default Cupola and docking collision?

On Feb 24, 2:02*pm, "Dr.Colon Oscopy"
wrote:
Structure looks pretty rugged, but "spaceglass" is just that. *I
haven't seen a lot of info on the retractable window covers. *They
appear to be rather thick, (crushable by design? ) and I'm wondering
as to reason for this?. * I do not think that the covers are there for
a pressure seal as well as the design does not look robust enough for
this * I haven't seen any protocol s on what needs to be done in case
of a threat to the Cupola?


The cupola can be sealed off from the rest of the node by shutting the
hatch.
  #3  
Old February 24th 10, 09:37 PM posted to sci.space.history
Pat Flannery
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 18,465
Default Cupola and docking collision?

On 2/24/2010 11:02 AM, Dr.Colon Oscopy wrote:
Structure looks pretty rugged, but "spaceglass" is just that. I
haven't seen a lot of info on the retractable window covers. They
appear to be rather thick, (crushable by design? ) and I'm wondering
as to reason for this?.


Although they seem awfully thick to me also (a lot thicker than was
shown on the NASA artwork of the cupola before the mission) they are
supposed to fulfill the dual purposes of micrometeor/space debris
protection and insulation from what I've read.
The fact that their inner surfaces are hollowed out probably makes them
look thicker than the really a
http://cdn.physorg.com/newman/gfx/ne...la-cut_400.jpg

I do not think that the covers are there for
a pressure seal as well as the design does not look robust enough for
this I haven't seen any protocol s on what needs to be done in case
of a threat to the Cupola? Just imagine anogther Progress or coming
Commercial vehicle impact. When Mir was hit I would imagine a lot of
the energy was absorbed by the solar panel before it hit the pressure
hull, hitting dead on is whole other storyh. Anybody know how fast
the retraction and deploy cycles are?


I imagine as fast as you can turn the little crank; that actually sounds
like how it's done according to this:
http://news.cnet.com/8301-19514_3-10...0&tag=untagged

Pat
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Questions about Cupola John Doe Space Station 3 February 21st 10 09:52 PM
STS-130 cupola question Pat Flannery History 12 February 10th 10 12:52 PM
Cupola Module David Space Shuttle 2 October 27th 04 03:19 PM
Cupola update Jim Kingdon Space Station 17 October 15th 04 04:30 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:23 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.