![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
With the recent Mars event I was persuaded to pull my old Meade 8" 2080 SCT
out to do some viewing. I had difficulty going through the "start" process using the CAT in spite of reading and re-reading the instruction manual. The good news - Mars is an easy target without the CAT. The bad news - The CAT appears to have a Y2K glitch. I have the 1996 CAT upgrade chips and am using the "2000" chip which is good though 2008. What I noticed is that during the START process I aligned on Polaris and then was asked to align on a bright reference star ON THE OTHER SIDE OF EARTH! This happened consistently. I rechecked my encoder setup although this couldn't possibly be the problem because, regardless of encoder alignment, my LONG, LAT, GMT settings should have been enough to determine which hemisphere I am in. I finally ran a quick test by running the START process using a 2003 date followed immediately by the same process using a 1999 date. The 1999 test actually used a bright star reference in my hemisphere and gave coordinates very close to it! If I used a 2003 date I was pointing about 10 hours behind (or 14 hours ahead) of actual star positions and was given bright star coordinates high toward zenith, but for a star in the wrong hemisphere. I suspect the 1996 chip upgrade had planetary tables through 2008 but the underlying code didn't properly handle dates beyond 2000 or 2001. I haven't done the research but I suspect I was being given bright star coordinates that were accurate in 1903? Has anyone heard of this problem or have any suggestions for a resolution (short of buying an new scope). -- Mike Payette |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Has anyone heard of this problem or have any suggestions for a resolution (short of buying an new scope). Hi: Why would you buy a new scope? The CAT system was nothing but a fairly primitive digital setting circle system. I would be fairly sure that JMI would be able to sell you not only a computer but an encoder installation package for the scope that will be nicer than the clunky old CAT encoderd. Peace, Rod Mollise Author of _Choosing and Using a Schmidt Cassegrain Telescope_ Like SCTs and MCTs? Check-out sct-user, the mailing list for CAT fanciers! Goto http://members.aol.com/RMOLLISE/index.html |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Has anyone heard of this problem or have any suggestions for a resolution (short of buying an new scope). Hi: Why would you buy a new scope? The CAT system was nothing but a fairly primitive digital setting circle system. I would be fairly sure that JMI would be able to sell you not only a computer but an encoder installation package for the scope that will be nicer than the clunky old CAT encoderd. Peace, Rod Mollise Author of _Choosing and Using a Schmidt Cassegrain Telescope_ Like SCTs and MCTs? Check-out sct-user, the mailing list for CAT fanciers! Goto http://members.aol.com/RMOLLISE/index.html |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Spirit has a mind of its own? | Jon Berndt | Space Shuttle | 33 | January 28th 04 04:48 AM |
Ned Wright's TBBNH Page (C) | Bjoern Feuerbacher | Astronomy Misc | 24 | October 2nd 03 06:50 PM |
Meade 7" ED any better than before? | CHASLX200 | Amateur Astronomy | 40 | August 26th 03 01:18 AM |
Meade LXD55 (10") or Meade Starfinder (12.5") ?? | Paige Turner | Amateur Astronomy | 13 | August 13th 03 02:52 AM |