|
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
January 26th 10, 07:43 AM
posted to sci.astro.amateur
|
|||
|
|||
Why don't the magazines do something useful?
There are dozens of companies hawking apos now. Most are rebranded Chinese
ED doublets. Why not take all their stuff and test it together? Should shake out the junk, if there is any. I'm particularly interested in how the Chinese ones now using FPL-53 fare against TeleVue, TMB, Tak. 
|
|
#2
January 26th 10, 12:48 PM
posted to sci.astro.amateur
|
|||
|
|||
|
Why don't the magazines do something useful?
On Jan 26, 8:43*am, Rich wrote:
There are dozens of companies hawking apos now. Most are rebranded Chinese ED doublets. Why not take all their stuff and test it together? *Should shake out the junk, if there is any. *I'm particularly interested in how the Chinese ones now using FPL-53 fare against TeleVue, TMB, Tak. Why are you interested? You should already know: I remember that you told us you have owned vritually every telescope that was ever made.
|
|
#3
January 26th 10, 02:34 PM
posted to sci.astro.amateur
|
|||
|
|||
|
Why don't the magazines do something useful?
Wackadoo !
"Rich" wrote in message ... There are dozens of companies hawking apos now. Most are rebranded Chinese ED doublets. Why not take all their stuff and test it together? Should shake out the junk, if there is any. I'm particularly interested in how the Chinese ones now using FPL-53 fare against TeleVue, TMB, Tak.
|
|
#4
January 27th 10, 12:03 AM
posted to sci.astro.amateur
|
|||
|
|||
|
Why don't the magazines do something useful?
On Jan 26, 7:48*am, Pierre Vandevenne wrote:
On Jan 26, 8:43*am, Rich wrote: There are dozens of companies hawking apos now. Most are rebranded Chinese ED doublets. Why not take all their stuff and test it together? *Should shake out the junk, if there is any. *I'm particularly interested in how the Chinese ones now using FPL-53 fare against TeleVue, TMB, Tak. Why are you interested? You should already know: I remember that you told us you have owned vritually every telescope that was ever made. Up to a certain age, I stopped the buying some time ago.
|
|
#5
January 27th 10, 06:05 AM
posted to sci.astro.amateur
|
|||
|
|||
|
Why don't the magazines do something useful?
Rich wrote: There are dozens of companies hawking apos now. Most are rebranded Chinese ED doublets. Why not take all their stuff and test it together? Should shake out the junk, if there is any. I'm particularly interested in how the Chinese ones now using FPL-53 fare against TeleVue, TMB, Tak. One day there will be one government, one corporation for all. But you will be dead. Too bad.
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| FA: old Sky and Telescope magazines | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | May 13th 05 06:49 AM |
| FA: old Sky and Telescope magazines | [email protected] | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | May 13th 05 06:49 AM |
| FA: Sky & Telescope Magazines 94 95 96 | Philip Steinman | Amateur Astronomy | 1 | March 24th 04 11:25 AM |
| What Magazines Do You Subscribe To? | Kevin Rehberg | Amateur Astronomy | 183 | February 7th 04 09:25 PM |
| Too Many Magazines | west | Misc | 1 | January 6th 04 01:39 AM |
Linear Mode
