FR Per. Prec. + Light Bending

I have implemented light bending into the FR simulator and we can
already see different result from standard Newtonian arithmetics and
Finite Relativism in the second tab:
http://www.fornux.com/personal/philippe/fr/fr.exe

The time dilation factor in direction to the Sun has been canceled.
Only the orthogonal time dilation factor to the planet - Sun vector is
considered. This doesn't change much the perihelion precession of
Mercury (from 2.5e-7 to 8e-7) but does impact light bending.


-Phil

Phil Bouchard wrote:

I have implemented light bending into the FR simulator and we can
already see different result from standard Newtonian arithmetics and
Finite Relativism in the second tab:
http://www.fornux.com/personal/philippe/fr/fr.exe

Nobody is stupid enough to run an executable.


The time dilation factor in direction to the Sun has been canceled.
Only the orthogonal time dilation factor to the planet - Sun vector is
considered. This doesn't change much the perihelion precession of
Mercury (from 2.5e-7 to 8e-7) but does impact light bending.

So FR is wrong. Again.

Why even post?



-Phil

eric gisse wrote:

Nobody is stupid enough to run an executable.

Once again my name is on it, there is no virus. If you don't trust me
run it on Doug's machine.

So FR is wrong. Again.

Why even post?

I'm currently adjusting it; when I reduce the time tick of the light
bending calculation I get a more important difference.

This is an update.

Sam Wormley wrote:

That makes about as much sense as putting a smaller wheel on the front
of your bicycle so's you can be going down hill all the time.

Hey Phil, See: Physics FAQ: Are There Any Good Books on Relativity
Theory?
http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physic..._booklist.html

Welcome back to get your nose bloodied some more, Phil. You must really
like the process (even be addicted to it) to be posting your drivel here
again. Potter does the same thing.

Sam does not know GPS is about to get replaced by Google Navigator:
http://www.google.com/mobile/navigat...html#p=default

Which makes Relativity even more useless than it is. Say goodbye to
Eric Gisse's prosperity.

On Nov 13, 10:18*am, Phil Bouchard wrote:

Which makes Relativity even more useless than it is. *

Delusions, delusions.

On Nov 13, 7:57*am, Sam Wormley wrote:
Phil Bouchard wrote:
I have implemented light bending into the FR simulator and we can
already see different result from standard Newtonian arithmetics and
Finite Relativism in the second tab:
http://www.fornux.com/personal/philippe/fr/fr.exe

The time dilation factor in direction to the Sun has been canceled. Only
the orthogonal time dilation factor to the planet - Sun vector is
considered. *This doesn't change much the perihelion precession of
Mercury (from 2.5e-7 to 8e-7) but does impact light bending.

* *That makes about as much sense as putting a smaller wheel on the front
* *of your bicycle so's you can be going down hill all the time.

* *Hey Phil, See: Physics FAQ: Are There Any Good Books on Relativity Theory?
* * *http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physic..._booklist.html

* *Welcome back to get your nose bloodied some more, Phil. You must really
* *like the process (even be addicted to it) to be posting your drivel here
* *again. Potter does the same thing.

Light bending is a parabola path in gravity aether.

Mitch Raemsch

Phil Bouchard wrote:
Sam Wormley wrote:

That makes about as much sense as putting a smaller wheel on the
front of your bicycle so's you can be going down hill all the time.

Hey Phil, See: Physics FAQ: Are There Any Good Books on Relativity
Theory?

http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physic..._booklist.html

Welcome back to get your nose bloodied some more, Phil. You must
really like the process (even be addicted to it) to be posting
your drivel here again. Potter does the same thing.

Sam does not know GPS is about to get replaced by Google Navigator:
http://www.google.com/mobile/navigat...html#p=default

From the link above:
"Google Maps Navigation is an internet-connected GPS navigation system with
voice guidance."


Which makes Relativity even more useless than it is. Say goodbye to
Eric Gisse's prosperity.

On Nov 13, 10:18*am, Phil Bouchard wrote:

Sam does not know GPS is about to get replaced by Google Navigator:http://www.google.com/mobile/navigat...html#p=default


Imbecile, Google Navigator is BASED on GPS.

On Nov 13, 12:14*pm, Phil Bouchard wrote:
eric gisse wrote:

Nobody is stupid enough to run an executable.

Once again my name is on it, there is no virus.

Phil, pardon me, but this assurance of nothing.

*If you don't trust me
run it on Doug's machine.

So FR is wrong. Again.

Why even post?

I'm currently adjusting it; when I reduce the time tick of the light
bending calculation I get a more important difference.

This is an update.

On Nov 13, 12:18*pm, Phil Bouchard wrote:


Sam does not know GPS is about to get replaced by Google Navigator:http://www.google.com/mobile/navigat...html#p=default

Phil, please. Can't you try a little harder not to be such an obvious
idiot? Google Navigator is *based* on GPS, which in turn *relies* on
relativity.

Which makes Relativity even more useless than it is. *Say goodbye to
Eric Gisse's prosperity.