OU physicists develop rationale for the next-generation particlecollider

OU physicists develop rationale for the next-generation particle collider
http://phys.org/news/2013-07-ou-phys...-particle.html

The ILC will allow particle physicists to study the Higgs particle
with much higher precision than is possible at the LHC. However, Baer
along with postdocs and students at OU have proposed the theory
"radiatively-driven natural supersymmetry," which predicts that new
partner particles of the Higgs known as higgsinos should be produced
at the ILC. The properties of higgsinos are such that they may
effectively be invisible to searches at LHC.

Baer has developed computer code over a 25-year period to calculate
super particle masses and production rates for the LHC in CERN. The
ILC would be a precision microscope for studying subatomic matter at
a deeper level than is possible at LHC.


Read more at:
http://phys.org/news/2013-07-ou-phys...ticle.html#jCp

On Tuesday, July 2, 2013 10:58:54 PM UTC+1, Sam Wormley wrote:
OU physicists develop rationale for the next-generation particle collider

http://phys.org/news/2013-07-ou-phys...-particle.html



The ILC will allow particle physicists to study the Higgs particle

with much higher precision than is possible at the LHC. However, Baer

along with postdocs and students at OU have proposed the theory

"radiatively-driven natural supersymmetry," which predicts that new

partner particles of the Higgs known as higgsinos should be produced

at the ILC. The properties of higgsinos are such that they may

effectively be invisible to searches at LHC.



Baer has developed computer code over a 25-year period to calculate

super particle masses and production rates for the LHC in CERN. The

ILC would be a precision microscope for studying subatomic matter at

a deeper level than is possible at LHC.





Read more at:

http://phys.org/news/2013-07-ou-phys...ticle.html#jCp

Wasting taxpayer's money may be a favorite pursuit of empirical modelers but better off achieving something that is exceptionally complicated and requires space based satellites - isolating daily and orbital motions by using both geosynchronous satellites and satellites riding the circle of illumination.

As the planetary surface turns once to the central Sun and coincident with the orbital period of the planet, a satellite in Sun synchronous orbit will register the polar coordinates turning beneath the satellite at the orbital equinox points and given that the Earth orbits the Sun at varying speeds this orbital component will register an uneven turning to the central Sun.

All it needs are genuine astronomers to appreciate the subtleties,complexities and difficulties in negating the orbital component in order to gauge the daily rotation of the surface in isolation.The amount of work this would generate would be astonishing by any standards.