![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sounds like he's talking about the Aether Theory without actually
mentioning the Aether here. Technology Review: Blogs: arXiv blog: The Clue That Could Explain The Fly-By Anomalies "Last year, we looked at an idea from Stephen Adler at Princeton University, that suggested the change in velocity could caused by collisions between the spacecraft and particles of dark matter. Adler even calculated the kind of distribution of dark matter particles that would explain the observed changes in velocity--a kind of halo of them around Earth. " http://www.technologyreview.com/blog/arxiv/24232/?a=f Yousuf Khan |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Yousuf Khan" wrote in message ... Sounds like he's talking about the Aether Theory without actually mentioning the Aether here. No, its got nothing whatsoever to do with that. Technology Review: Blogs: arXiv blog: The Clue That Could Explain The Fly-By Anomalies "Last year, we looked at an idea from Stephen Adler at Princeton University, that suggested the change in velocity could caused by collisions between the spacecraft and particles of dark matter. Adler even calculated the kind of distribution of dark matter particles that would explain the observed changes in velocity--a kind of halo of them around Earth. " http://www.technologyreview.com/blog/arxiv/24232/?a=f Yousuf Khan Funny that the earth is surrounded by enough of these to noticeably slow a spaceship, but none has even been observed on earth. I wonder if the paper has an explanation of this curious fact ... |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yousuf Khan wrote:
Sounds like he's talking about the Aether Theory without actually mentioning the Aether here. Technology Review: Blogs: arXiv blog: The Clue That Could Explain The Fly-By Anomalies "Last year, we looked at an idea from Stephen Adler at Princeton University, that suggested the change in velocity could caused by ollisions between the spacecraft and particles of dark matter. Adler Not even wrong. Sorry. even calculated the kind of distribution of dark matter particles that would explain the observed changes in velocity--a kind of halo of them around Earth. " http://www.technologyreview.com/blog/arxiv/24232/?a=f Yousuf Khan |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dear Yousuf Khan:
On Oct 13, 10:57*pm, Yousuf Khan wrote: Sounds like he's talking about the Aether Theory without actually mentioning the Aether here. Technology Review: Blogs: arXiv blog: The Clue That Could Explain The Fly-By Anomalies "Last year, we looked at an idea from Stephen Adler at Princeton University, That there is a different kind of Dark Matter "in front" of a boosting planet, than the kind "behind"... and that this Dark Matter isn't Dark and actually must interact in ways that are obviated by other observations. Including downing satellites anomalously. that suggested the change in velocity could caused by collisions between the spacecraft and particles of dark matter. Adler even calculated the kind of distribution of dark matter particles that would explain the observed changes in velocity--a kind of halo of them around Earth. "http://www.technologyreview.com/blog/arxiv/24232/?a=f Don't waste another thought on this Rube Goldberg contraption. David A. Smith |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yousuf Khan wrote:
Sounds like he's talking about the Aether Theory without actually mentioning the Aether here. Technology Review: Blogs: arXiv blog: The Clue That Could Explain The Fly-By Anomalies "Last year, we looked at an idea from Stephen Adler at Princeton University, that suggested the change in velocity could caused by collisions between the spacecraft and particles of dark matter. Adler even calculated the kind of distribution of dark matter particles that would explain the observed changes in velocity--a kind of halo of them around Earth. " http://www.technologyreview.com/blog/arxiv/24232/?a=f Yousuf Khan By hypothesis and definition dark matter does not interact except by gravitation. Do neutrinos slow spacecraft? -- Uncle Al http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/ (Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals) http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2 |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In sci.astro Yousuf Khan wrote:
Sounds like he's talking about the Aether Theory without actually mentioning the Aether here. Technology Review: Blogs: arXiv blog: The Clue That Could Explain The Fly-By Anomalies "Last year, we looked at an idea from Stephen Adler at Princeton University, that suggested the change in velocity could caused by collisions between the spacecraft and particles of dark matter. Adler even calculated the kind of distribution of dark matter particles that would explain the observed changes in velocity--a kind of halo of them around Earth. " No. Adler's papers investigate the possibility that the flyby anomalies might be caused by drag as spacecraft pass through a cloud of dark matter gravitationally bound to the Earth. In his most recent preprint he suggests a specific experimental signature (collisions with dark matter should slightly heat the spacecraft). The relevant preprints are arXiv:0903.4879, arXiv:0908.2414, and arXiv:0910.1564. Steve Carlip |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In sci.astro Uncle Al wrote:
By hypothesis and definition dark matter does not interact except by gravitation. Not true. By hypothesis, dark matter interacts weakly, but there is certainly no requirement of no nongravitational interaction. In fact, popular candidates (lightest supersymmetric particle, axions) certainly do have nongravitational interactions. In fact, a major experimental effort is going into searches for dark matter through such interactions. Steve Carlip |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 14, 8:27*am, wrote:
In sci.astro Uncle Al wrote: By hypothesis and definition dark matter does not interact except by gravitation. * Not true. *By hypothesis, dark matter interacts weakly, but there is certainly no requirement of no nongravitational interaction. For Dark Matter as WIMPs, this is true. But the Bullet Cluster obviates such weakly interacting Dark Matter, doesn't it? The visible matter is pretty hot, so maybe we cannot evaluate how much normal matter is there... *In fact, popular candidates (lightest supersymmetric particle, axions) certainly do have nongravitational interactions. *In fact, a major experimental effort is going into searches for dark matter through such interactions. Isn't that a bit like searching for a lost item under a streetlight, even if we did not lose the item there, because we can at least see? David A. Smith |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
carlip-nospam wrote on Wed, 14 Oct 2009 15:27:19 +0000:
In sci.astro Uncle Al wrote: By hypothesis and definition dark matter does not interact except by gravitation. Not true. By hypothesis, dark matter interacts weakly, but there is certainly no requirement of no nongravitational interaction. In fact, popular candidates (lightest supersymmetric particle, axions) certainly do have nongravitational interactions. In fact, a major experimental effort is going into searches for dark matter through such interactions. What a waste of time and money! Steve Carlip -- http://www.canonicalscience.org/ BLOG: http://www.canonicalscience.org/en/p...encetoday.html |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Complete dark matter theory opens door to weight/energy potential(Dark matter is considered to be the top mystery in science today, solved,really.) And more finding on dark matter ebergy science from the 1930's. | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | September 14th 08 03:03 AM |
Dark matter means ebergy (ebergy known since the 1930's to makeenergy from 'dark matter'). Dark matter is solved for the first time (100pages) | gb[_3_] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | August 5th 08 05:24 PM |
Grand Perpetuum Mobile Theory may explain dark matter | gb[_3_] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | March 26th 08 02:11 AM |
Another attempt to explain dark matter | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 31 | May 5th 06 03:49 PM |