LRO images Apollo landing sites

http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/LR...ollosites.html

On Jul 17, 10:41*am, " wrote:
http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/LR...ges/apollosite...

Better late than never. Now we need to see if everything fits the
Apollo record, or if we're looking at one-way unmanned hard landings.

The really dark and scary side of our mutually perpetrated cold-war
founded DARPA and of its civil service populated NASA has its past
Zionist Nazi leaders and devout OT thumping army of brown-nosed
minions and clowns, exactly like OM and so many other public funded
individuals that wouldn’t dare spill any beans.

Those monthly 575 over-lapping (5 km wide) scans of our physically
dark and otherwise mineral and meteor saturated surface should be
covering those Apollo landing/impact sites as of any day now (actually
these first few scans are of nearly 15 km wide until the 50 km
circular orbit is fully established). Within 4 months having 100+%
coverage via multiple instruments of recording most every conceivable
spectrum in reflectance and secondary/recoil fluorescence (including
IR, UV, radar, X-ray and gamma spectrometry).

Don't you think we that pay for everything should be allowed to at
least see and to otherwise review all 100% of that public funded LRO
data, instead of the less than 0.1% that's moderated and/or filtered
in order to best suit their own PR eye-candy and infomercial hype?

~ BG

wrote:
http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/LR...ollosites.html


They even managed to show the footprints on the Apollo 14 site!

Pat

Pat Flannery wrote:
wrote:
http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/LR...ollosites.html


They even managed to show the footprints on the Apollo 14 site!

I suspect they are showing up better at the 14 site because they are
also accompanied by the handcart tracks.

D.
--
Touch-twice life. Eat. Drink. Laugh.

http://derekl1963.livejournal.com/

-Resolved: To be more temperate in my postings.
Oct 5th, 2004 JDL

On Fri, 17 Jul 2009 20:38:45 GMT, (Derek Lyons)
wrote:

I suspect they are showing up better at the 14 site because they are
also accompanied by the handcart tracks.

Good thought - very likely the case.
--
Replace you know what by j to email

On Fri, 17 Jul 2009 20:38:45 GMT, (Derek Lyons)
wrote:

I suspect they are showing up better at the 14 site because they are
also accompanied by the handcart tracks.

I see two trails. Did they take the handcart back to the LM after the
scientific instruments were deployed?
--
Replace you know what by j to email

On Fri, 17 Jul 2009 20:38:45 GMT, (Derek Lyons)
wrote:

I suspect they are showing up better at the 14 site because they are
also accompanied by the handcart tracks.

But what about rover tracks on 15, 16, and 17?
--
Replace you know what by j to email

On Jul 17, 4:47*pm, Jud McCranie
wrote:
On Fri, 17 Jul 2009 20:38:45 GMT, (Derek Lyons)
wrote:

I suspect they are showing up better at the 14 site because they are
also accompanied by the handcart tracks.

But what about rover tracks on 15, 16, and 17?
--
Replace you know what by j to email

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The 16 photo you can see the descent lander in shadow on the adjacent
crater wall (right on crater wall). The 17 shot you can see tracks or
trails (rover or human) going to the right and arcing a little down
towards the deep crater. I'll have to look up the landmark names.
For some reason I thought these first shots would be of higher
resolution, but can you imagine 2 or 3x better!!!.................Doc

On Fri, 17 Jul 2009 14:13:03 -0700 (PDT), "Dr.Colon Oscopy"
wrote:

The 16 photo you can see the descent lander in shadow on the adjacent
crater wall (right on crater wall).

Yes, i noticed that.

The 17 shot you can see tracks or
trails (rover or human) going to the right and arcing a little down
towards the deep crater.

I see a faint line above and to the right of the LM, is that it?
--
Replace you know what by j to email

On Jul 17, 1:41*pm, " wrote:
http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/LR...ges/apollosite...

Very cool.

I wonder if the crater with VW-sized boulders that the Apollo 11 crew
found themselves being autotargeted into would be visible and
identifiable?

When they image the Apollo 12 site, it will interesting to see if the
Surveyor spacecraft would be visible. In that same vein, it would be
interesting to see other Surveyor sites as well as the Lunikod or Luna
sites.

Take care all . . .

John