Will this end the hoaxters??

Will LROC put to rest the years long bull**** about the moon landing hoax?

At being able to see features only 3 meters wide I should think NASA should
do this.
They did it with the face on Mars, now they should do it for Apollo.
If not for that, at least for posterity. I suppose though that people will
say "Ohhh nooo
why should they at all??" That's the othger side of the coin...those
people are a bad as the hoaxter types.

Me? I wanna see the Apollo hardware from above just for the halibut ! !

http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/LR...0090702_a.html

Will LROC put to rest the years long bull**** about the moon landing hoax?

At being able to see features only 3 meters wide I should think NASA
should do this.
They did it with the face on Mars, now they should do it for Apollo.
If not for that, at least for posterity. I suppose though that people
will say "Ohhh nooo
why should they at all??" That's the othger side of the coin...those
people are a bad as the hoaxter types.

Me? I wanna see the Apollo hardware from above just for the halibut ! !

http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/LR...0090702_a.html


I don't see why NASA should bother with "bull**** about the moon landing
hoax". The kooks will just find something else to be kooky about, e.g. does
anybody think that folks who are worried about the world coming to an end in
2012 will be cured in 2013?

Dennis

In news:NA73m.34457$PH1.15812@edtnps82 "Michael Toms"
wrote:

Will LROC put to rest the years long bull**** about the moon landing
hoax?

Of course not.

Any images presented as evidence will be dismissed as more fakes.

--
Bert Hyman St. Paul, MN

Michael Toms wrote:
Will LROC put to rest the years long bull**** about the moon landing hoax?

At being able to see features only 3 meters wide I should think NASA should
do this.
They did it with the face on Mars, now they should do it for Apollo.
If not for that, at least for posterity. I suppose though that people will
say "Ohhh nooo
why should they at all??" That's the othger side of the coin...those
people are a bad as the hoaxter types.

Me? I wanna see the Apollo hardware from above just for the halibut ! !

http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/LR...0090702_a.html

Unfortunately, the "moon-landing-hoax" is what James Randi, in a most
felicitous turn of phrase, has termed "an unsinkable duck".


Haiku Jones

On Thu, 02 Jul 2009 19:08:29 GMT, "Michael Toms"
wrote:

Will LROC put to rest the years long bull**** about the moon landing hoax?

At being able to see features only 3 meters wide I should think NASA should
do this.
They did it with the face on Mars, now they should do it for Apollo.

In case you didn't notice, the whole face on Mars issue is still being
presented as an alien artifact. High resolution images did nothing to
change things, and they won't change anything with the Moon hoax crowd,
either.

You can't convince a paranoid to stop being so simply by presenting
rational evidence. You need drugs to do that.
_________________________________________________

Chris L Peterson
Cloudbait Observatory
http://www.cloudbait.com

Bert Hyman wrote:
In news:NA73m.34457$PH1.15812@edtnps82 "Michael Toms"
wrote:

Will LROC put to rest the years long bull**** about the moon landing
hoax?

Of course not.

Any images presented as evidence will be dismissed as more fakes.

--
Bert Hyman St. Paul, MN

Well, except that the so-called "Moon landing"
films WERE a hoax.

Far from being shot "on the Moon", those
films were actually faked on a secret
NASA sound stage somwehere near the South Pole
of Enceladus.

Don't believe me? Prove it for yourself.
Freeze frame #129382, and you can clearly
see where some NASA "big brain" was asleep
at the switch, and forgot to edit out the
rings of Saturn. And in frames #294924-7,
you can see, unmistakably, three cryovolcanoes
erupting, just inside the right edge
of the frame.

"Moon landings" indeed! PFfffftt! NASA
was just trying to "cover up" the fact
that they had already explored the
outer reaches of the solar system,
and were currently spending the
gazillion dollars a year of YOUR
money we gave them for "space exploration"
on Cuban cigars and rides at Disney World

What? Oh, I suppose you *also* believe
that Disney World wasn't built until 1971.
Don't you people ever GET IT? That's
WHAT THEY WANT YOU TO BELIEVE!!!


Haiku Jones

p.s: those six dark spots in the left-center
of frames #294355-67? Fossil Enceladusian
trilobite carapaces. A fool could see that.

On Jul 2, 8:47*pm, Chris L Peterson wrote:
On Thu, 02 Jul 2009 19:08:29 GMT, "Michael Toms"
wrote:

Will LROC put to rest the years long bull**** about the moon landing hoax?

At being able to see features only 3 meters wide I should think NASA should
do this.
They did it with the face on Mars, now they should do it for Apollo.

In case you didn't notice, the whole face on Mars issue is still being
presented as an alien artifact. High resolution images did nothing to
change things, and they won't change anything with the Moon hoax crowd,
either.

You can't convince a paranoid to stop being so simply by presenting
rational evidence. You need drugs to do that.
_________________________________________________

Chris L Peterson
Cloudbait Observatoryhttp://www.cloudbait.com

I can't remember a single dull moment in the journey to discover the
history of clocks,planetary dynamics and geometry yet the conclusion
that the Earth will rotate 69.17 miles every 4 minutes at the Equator
and turn through a full 24 901.5 mile circumference in 24 hours
contains so much more history than a person can absorb in a lifetime -

http://www.grand-illusions.com/artic...e/page04.shtml

Your old commie indoctrination just does not have that frontier spirit
about it and how many good kids are robbed of the pleasure of
becoming familiar with the human struggle to create the timekeeping
systems and conventions we use today.John Harrison was basically a one
man version of NASA yet look what each and every one of you do every
time you try to obscure the principles which link the 24 hour clock to
the raw astronomical cycles , planetary dynamics and terrestrial
geography .Nobody pays attention to the moon-hoaxers yet when it comes
to the invention of accurate clocks in respect to planetary geography
and dynamics,you yourselves are worse.

You can believe what you wish,that is what freedom is all about,I too
am free to believe the Earth turns once in 24 hours and 15 degrees per
hour yet I am alone in that view for many years in this forum and
that is the most disconcerting thing

On Jul 2, 1:24*pm, oriel36 wrote:

You can believe what you wish,that is what freedom is all about,I too
am free to believe the Earth turns once in 24 hours and 15 degrees per
hour yet I am alone in that view *for many years in this forum *and
that is the most disconcerting thing

We have already gone over this, you are not alone with that view, with
respect to the sun we all agree with you, we all believe the same
thing, so get off your high horse and knock off the disparaging
remarks.

Time to move on to a different frame of reference, where things really
get exciting.

\Paul A

It will probably quiet a few of them down..thinning the ranks. But
probably just as soon as one issue gets solved enough some other sad
soul will invent another conspiracy....

On Thu, 2 Jul 2009 15:06:14 -0700 (PDT), "P. Edward Murray"
wrote:

It will probably quiet a few of them down..thinning the ranks. But
probably just as soon as one issue gets solved enough some other sad
soul will invent another conspiracy....

Well, the sort of casual "conspiracy of the month" folks might drift off
to something else. But each of these wacky beliefs has a core group of
disciples, and nothing will change their views. Of course, sometimes
they aren't so wacky at all. Hoagland and his crew are making a lot of
money from books and websites promoting the whole face on Mars
conspiracy. He's probably too smart to actually believe this stuff- he's
just a modern P. T. Barnum, dependent on suckers for his income.
_________________________________________________

Chris L Peterson
Cloudbait Observatory
http://www.cloudbait.com