A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Others » Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

What if(on the greatest balancing act)



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old June 19th 09, 12:41 PM posted to alt.astronomy
G=EMC^2 Glazier[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10,860
Default What if(on the greatest balancing act)

There is one such area that gave life to the big bang. There is one such
area of our Sun that is in such perfect balance. Keep its balance for
over 10 billion years. Keep its balance and still give off all the
energy(EM) to its solar system it helped to create Its never written
about by our imperial thinkers. I woke up thinking of this area this
morning. I relate this area as an "Event Horizon" for the Sun.
This area is between the core,and the radiative zone. I realize the
Sun's core is small,for it only contains 7% of Sun's volume,but contains
half its mass WOW Its where solar energy is created it has a
temperature of 28.000.000F WOW Here is the kicker all this is contained
and made into a ball by the compression force of gravity. Not a gravity
strong enough to keep photons inside this horizon but to have them come
out at a steady flow. To have only very high energy photons come out
(Gamma) My own theory is the radiative layer is so very dense that its
atoms absorb these photons make them use up energy and give them as long
as 200,000 years to break through the sun surface and heat and light the
solar system. Yes medium stars create life in the universe because
mother nature uses them as her best stars for her #1 balancing act.
Having gravity match the EM force created by fusion. Fact is gravity
creates the fusion. It makes my G=EMC^2 equation reality. Mother nature
created me so she can see the universe. I just hope I am showing it to
her clearly??? Like to mention that taking 200,000 years is a long
time to go 420,000 miles,and is another reason for my bringing in "Event
Horizon" it kind of fits(in a way) All this is not from books,so fire
away. TreBert

  #2  
Old June 19th 09, 02:58 PM posted to alt.astronomy
BradGuth
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 21,544
Default What if(on the greatest balancing act)

On Jun 19, 4:41*am, (G=EMC^2 Glazier) wrote:
There is one such area that gave life to the big bang. There is one such
area of our Sun that is in such perfect balance. Keep its balance for
over 10 billion years. Keep its balance and still give off all the
energy(EM) to its solar system it helped to create *Its never written
about by our imperial thinkers. I woke up thinking of this area this
morning. I relate this area as an "Event Horizon" for the Sun.
This area is between the core,and the radiative zone. I realize the
Sun's core is small,for it only contains 7% of Sun's volume,but contains
half its mass WOW * Its where solar energy is created it has a
temperature of 28.000.000F WOW *Here is the kicker all this is contained
and made into a ball by the compression force of gravity. Not a gravity
strong enough to keep photons inside this horizon but to have them come
out at a steady flow. To have only very high energy photons come out
(Gamma) * My own theory is the radiative layer is so very dense that its
atoms absorb these photons make them use up energy and give them as long
as 200,000 years to break through the sun surface and heat and light the
solar system. * Yes medium stars create life in the universe because
mother nature uses them as her best stars for her #1 balancing act.
Having gravity match the EM force created by fusion. Fact is gravity
creates the fusion. It makes my G=EMC^2 equation reality. Mother nature
created me so she can see the universe. I just hope I am showing it to
her clearly??? * *Like to mention that taking 200,000 years is a long
time to go 420,000 miles,and is another reason for my bringing in "Event
Horizon" it kind of fits(in a way) * All this is not from books,so fire
away. * TreBert


Our sun has been consuming and tossing away a staggering amount of
mass, of somewhere between 2e12 kg/sec and 3e12 kg/sec, whereas it's
solar wind has been removing roughly 1e3 kg/sec from Earth.

Essentially, we've been incorrectly informed by those in charge of
such matters, and as such we can't seem to properly fathom the
consequences, especially as they affect our Eden/Earth and the nearby
Sirius star/solar system that was our second sun for quite some time.

~ BG

  #3  
Old June 19th 09, 09:31 PM posted to alt.astronomy
Double-A[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,635
Default What if(on the greatest balancing act)

On Jun 19, 6:58*am, BradGuth wrote:
On Jun 19, 4:41*am, (G=EMC^2 Glazier) wrote:





There is one such area that gave life to the big bang. There is one such
area of our Sun that is in such perfect balance. Keep its balance for
over 10 billion years. Keep its balance and still give off all the
energy(EM) to its solar system it helped to create *Its never written
about by our imperial thinkers. I woke up thinking of this area this
morning. I relate this area as an "Event Horizon" for the Sun.
This area is between the core,and the radiative zone. I realize the
Sun's core is small,for it only contains 7% of Sun's volume,but contains
half its mass WOW * Its where solar energy is created it has a
temperature of 28.000.000F WOW *Here is the kicker all this is contained
and made into a ball by the compression force of gravity. Not a gravity
strong enough to keep photons inside this horizon but to have them come
out at a steady flow. To have only very high energy photons come out
(Gamma) * My own theory is the radiative layer is so very dense that its
atoms absorb these photons make them use up energy and give them as long
as 200,000 years to break through the sun surface and heat and light the
solar system. * Yes medium stars create life in the universe because
mother nature uses them as her best stars for her #1 balancing act.
Having gravity match the EM force created by fusion. Fact is gravity
creates the fusion. It makes my G=EMC^2 equation reality. Mother nature
created me so she can see the universe. I just hope I am showing it to
her clearly??? * *Like to mention that taking 200,000 years is a long
time to go 420,000 miles,and is another reason for my bringing in "Event
Horizon" it kind of fits(in a way) * All this is not from books,so fire
away. * TreBert


Our sun has been consuming and tossing away a staggering amount of
mass, of somewhere between 2e12 kg/sec and 3e12 kg/sec, whereas it's
solar wind has been removing roughly 1e3 kg/sec from Earth.

Essentially, we've been incorrectly informed by those in charge of
such matters, and as such we can't seem to properly fathom the
consequences, especially as they affect our Eden/Earth and the nearby
Sirius star/solar system that was our second sun for quite some time.

*~ BG



The correct value is only 6 billion kg/sec.

http://www.universetoday.com/2008/02...un-loses-mass/

Double-A

  #4  
Old June 19th 09, 10:51 PM posted to alt.astronomy
BradGuth
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 21,544
Default What if(on the greatest balancing act)

On Jun 19, 1:31*pm, Double-A wrote:
On Jun 19, 6:58*am, BradGuth wrote:



On Jun 19, 4:41*am, (G=EMC^2 Glazier) wrote:


There is one such area that gave life to the big bang. There is one such
area of our Sun that is in such perfect balance. Keep its balance for
over 10 billion years. Keep its balance and still give off all the
energy(EM) to its solar system it helped to create *Its never written
about by our imperial thinkers. I woke up thinking of this area this
morning. I relate this area as an "Event Horizon" for the Sun.
This area is between the core,and the radiative zone. I realize the
Sun's core is small,for it only contains 7% of Sun's volume,but contains
half its mass WOW * Its where solar energy is created it has a
temperature of 28.000.000F WOW *Here is the kicker all this is contained
and made into a ball by the compression force of gravity. Not a gravity
strong enough to keep photons inside this horizon but to have them come
out at a steady flow. To have only very high energy photons come out
(Gamma) * My own theory is the radiative layer is so very dense that its
atoms absorb these photons make them use up energy and give them as long
as 200,000 years to break through the sun surface and heat and light the
solar system. * Yes medium stars create life in the universe because
mother nature uses them as her best stars for her #1 balancing act.
Having gravity match the EM force created by fusion. Fact is gravity
creates the fusion. It makes my G=EMC^2 equation reality. Mother nature
created me so she can see the universe. I just hope I am showing it to
her clearly??? * *Like to mention that taking 200,000 years is a long
time to go 420,000 miles,and is another reason for my bringing in "Event
Horizon" it kind of fits(in a way) * All this is not from books,so fire
away. * TreBert


Our sun has been consuming and tossing away a staggering amount of
mass, of somewhere between 2e12 kg/sec and 3e12 kg/sec, whereas it's
solar wind has been removing roughly 1e3 kg/sec from Earth.


Essentially, we've been incorrectly informed by those in charge of
such matters, and as such we can't seem to properly fathom the
consequences, especially as they affect our Eden/Earth and the nearby
Sirius star/solar system that was our second sun for quite some time.


*~ BG


The correct value is only 6 billion kg/sec.

http://www.universetoday.com/2008/02...l-unit-may-nee...

Double-A


In that case our sun will never go red giant, because of the required
time to consume a third of its mostly hydrogen mass at the wussy rate
of 6e9 kg/sec simply doesn't cut it.

1/3 solar mass = 6.7e29 kg

1 year = 3.1536e7 seconds

6.7e29 / 6e9 / 3.1536e7 = 3.541e12 years (that's 3,541 billion years)

The original sun might have represented 2.1e30 kg, and thus bringing
the red giant phase only after 3.7 trillion years if limited as to the
loss of 6e9 kg/sec, which doesn't add up to what stars are supposed to
do.

Obvious in my previous estimate of 2~3e12 kg/sec (possibly as great as
4e12 kg/sec) is not excluding what CMEs manage to toss away.

~ BG
  #5  
Old June 19th 09, 11:09 PM posted to alt.astronomy
BradGuth
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 21,544
Default What if(on the greatest balancing act)

On Jun 19, 4:41*am, (G=EMC^2 Glazier) wrote:
There is one such area that gave life to the big bang. There is one such
area of our Sun that is in such perfect balance. Keep its balance for
over 10 billion years. Keep its balance and still give off all the
energy(EM) to its solar system it helped to create *Its never written
about by our imperial thinkers. I woke up thinking of this area this
morning. I relate this area as an "Event Horizon" for the Sun.
This area is between the core,and the radiative zone. I realize the
Sun's core is small,for it only contains 7% of Sun's volume,but contains
half its mass WOW * Its where solar energy is created it has a
temperature of 28.000.000F WOW *Here is the kicker all this is contained
and made into a ball by the compression force of gravity. Not a gravity
strong enough to keep photons inside this horizon but to have them come
out at a steady flow. To have only very high energy photons come out
(Gamma) * My own theory is the radiative layer is so very dense that its
atoms absorb these photons make them use up energy and give them as long
as 200,000 years to break through the sun surface and heat and light the
solar system. * Yes medium stars create life in the universe because
mother nature uses them as her best stars for her #1 balancing act.
Having gravity match the EM force created by fusion. Fact is gravity
creates the fusion. It makes my G=EMC^2 equation reality. Mother nature
created me so she can see the universe. I just hope I am showing it to
her clearly??? * *Like to mention that taking 200,000 years is a long
time to go 420,000 miles,and is another reason for my bringing in "Event
Horizon" it kind of fits(in a way) * All this is not from books,so fire
away. * TreBert


The ongoing mass loss from our sun:

The correct value is only 6 billion kg/sec.

http://www.universetoday.com/2008/02...l-unit-may-nee....

Double-A


In that case our sun will never go red giant, because of the required
time to consume a third of its mostly hydrogen mass at the wussy rate
of merely 6e9 kg/sec simply doesn't cut it.

1/3 solar mass = 6.7e29 kg

1 year = 3.1536e7 seconds

6.7e29 / 6e9 / 3.1536e7 = 3.541e12 years (that's 3,541 billion years)

The original sun might have represented 2.1e30 kg, and thus bringing
the red giant phase only after 3.7 trillion years if limited as to the
loss of merely 6e9 kg/sec, which doesn't add up to what stars are
supposed to do.

Obvious in my previous estimate of 2~3e12 kg/sec (possibly as great as
4e12 kg/sec) is not excluding what CMEs manage to toss away.

Our sun has been consuming and otherwise tossing away a staggering
amount of its mass, of somewhere between 2 and 3e12 kg/sec (possibly
as great as 4e12 kg/sec), whereas subsequently and especially as of
lately the solar wind has been removing roughly 1e3 kg/sec from Earth,
artificially assisted by those of us intent upon making a fast energy
and industrial buck without regard as to whatever the consequences.

Essentially, we've been incorrectly informed by those in charge of
such matters (meaning extensively Big Energy), and as such we’ve been
cabal snookered and systematically dumbfounded so that we can't seem
to properly fathom the consequences, especially as they affect the
frail environment of our Eden/Earth and that of whatever the nearby
Sirius star/solar system as our second sun for quite some time had to
offer.

The failing geomagnetic force that sustains our protective
magnetosphere has been losing it’s worth at the rate of -0.1%/year,
combined with the solar maximum cycle that’s coming as of 2012 is
going to become another test for the stamina for our frail DNA.

~ BG
  #6  
Old June 19th 09, 11:26 PM posted to alt.astronomy
Double-A[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,635
Default What if(on the greatest balancing act)

On Jun 19, 2:11*pm, Saul Levy wrote:
GOOFBALL makes up HIS OWN FIGURES, DA! *lmfjao!

Where they come from I have NO IDEA!

Saul Levy



I figured!

Double-A


On Fri, 19 Jun 2009 13:31:08 -0700 (PDT), Double-A



wrote:
Our sun has been consuming and tossing away a staggering amount of
mass, of somewhere between 2e12 kg/sec and 3e12 kg/sec, whereas it's
solar wind has been removing roughly 1e3 kg/sec from Earth.


Essentially, we've been incorrectly informed by those in charge of
such matters, and as such we can't seem to properly fathom the
consequences, especially as they affect our Eden/Earth and the nearby
Sirius star/solar system that was our second sun for quite some time.


*~ BG


The correct value is only 6 billion kg/sec.


http://www.universetoday.com/2008/02...l-unit-may-nee...


Double-A

  #7  
Old June 19th 09, 11:36 PM posted to alt.astronomy
BradGuth
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 21,544
Default What if(on the greatest balancing act)

On Jun 19, 3:26*pm, Double-A wrote:
On Jun 19, 2:11*pm, Saul Levy wrote:

GOOFBALL makes up HIS OWN FIGURES, DA! *lmfjao!


Where they come from I have NO IDEA!


Saul Levy


I figured!

Double-A

On Fri, 19 Jun 2009 13:31:08 -0700 (PDT), Double-A


wrote:
Our sun has been consuming and tossing away a staggering amount of
mass, of somewhere between 2e12 kg/sec and 3e12 kg/sec, whereas it's
solar wind has been removing roughly 1e3 kg/sec from Earth.


Essentially, we've been incorrectly informed by those in charge of
such matters, and as such we can't seem to properly fathom the
consequences, especially as they affect our Eden/Earth and the nearby
Sirius star/solar system that was our second sun for quite some time..


*~ BG


The correct value is only 6 billion kg/sec.


http://www.universetoday.com/2008/02...l-unit-may-nee....


Double-A


No, the underlying problem here is that you and others of your
mainstream snookered and dumbfounded kind simply do not figure out
much of anything for yourself. You steadfast believe most anything
that's found in your faith-based government print.

Guess again as to why this nation is bankrupted and otherwise SEC and
Federal Reserve corrupted itself past the point of no return, and
perhaps this time don't leave yourself out of the loop.

~ BG
  #8  
Old June 20th 09, 12:38 PM posted to alt.astronomy
G=EMC^2 Glazier[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10,860
Default What if(on the greatest balancing act)

Double A I post an interesting topic on astronomy,and you can see how
it only leads to infighting. Those that fight among themselves are no
credit to astronomy news groups. They are a hateful low life bunch of
idiots. TreBert

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Bush: Greatest World Leader & Greatest President In History? ` ` Anonymous[_12_] Astronomy Misc 2 March 18th 08 09:18 PM
Bush: Greatest World Leader & Greatest President In History? ` ` Anonymous[_12_] Amateur Astronomy 2 March 18th 08 09:18 PM
Balancing act Tony UK Astronomy 3 October 10th 05 07:51 AM
Greatest Brilliancy ==> Greatest Illuminated Extent Paul Schlyter Amateur Astronomy 1 September 18th 05 06:57 PM
qestion on RA and DEC Balancing n3drk UK Astronomy 4 November 24th 03 02:53 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:28 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.