A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Astronomy Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

How early can life have started? 12 billion years ago!



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old June 17th 09, 06:59 PM posted to sci.astro,sci.physics
Yousuf Khan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 594
Default How early can life have started? 12 billion years ago!

Or at least that's the theory put forward by two scientists. They are
calculating how early several essential ingredients of life may have
started in the universe and when they would've been in enough abundance
to start forming life somewhere in the Universe.

Yousuf Khan

SPACE.com -- Could Life Be 12 Billion Years Old?
"Aparna Venkatesan, of the University of San Francisco, and Lynn
Rothschild, of NASA's Ames Research Center in Moffett Field, Calif., are
using models of star formation and destruction to determine when in the
roughly 13.7 billion-year history of the universe the biogenic elements
– those essential to life as we know it – might have been pervasive
enough to allow life to form."
http://www.space.com/scienceastronom...-elements.html
  #2  
Old June 17th 09, 07:48 PM posted to sci.astro,sci.physics
Yousuf Khan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 594
Default How early can life have started? 12 billion years ago!

Sam Wormley wrote:
H, C, N, O should be sufficient... the latter three produced in the
first generation of stars.



Well, actually, they say that it took a bit longer for C & N to form,
since the first generation of stars were likely behemoths that blew up
quickly and produced a lot of iron and magnesium. Later generations of
small and medium sized stars were needed to form C, N, O.

Yousuf Khan
  #3  
Old June 17th 09, 08:22 PM posted to sci.astro,sci.physics
john240509
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2
Default How early can life have started? 12 billion years ago!

On Jun 17, 1:07 pm, Sam Wormley wrote:
Yousuf Khan wrote:
Sam Wormley wrote:
H, C, N, O should be sufficient... the latter three produced in the
first generation of stars.


Well, actually, they say that it took a bit longer for C & N to form,
since the first generation of stars were likely behemoths that blew up
quickly and produced a lot of iron and magnesium. Later generations of
small and medium sized stars were needed to form C, N, O.


Yousuf Khan


You are wrong... look up stellar evolution... stars can't fuse magnesium
(and eventually iron) directly from hydrogen (or helium).


And you are in fantasyland.
We've looked that far away and seen
fully-formed galaxies.

And surprise, surprise- all the galaxies all the
way out to the limit of our sight have fully-formed
discrete ARMS of stars from center to edge.
Imagine that!?

There was no Big Bang.

The only way EVERY point can observe uniform
red-shifting is if it is solely due to the effect
of distance on the light.

NUMBskulls. But too hardened in your false
premises to change- oh well- like your diet of
God's creatures; enslaved, tortured, and then
eaten. Surprise, surprise- cancer, arthritis, suffering is
what you get, but you gotta taste that burger!!!

Graze the cows on half the
world's grains- cut down rainforest to feed them
one season- let people go hungry.

HEY. It's a good life until you are in
your twenties, then give your money to the
drug companies and your spine slowly curls
up.

john
  #4  
Old June 17th 09, 08:53 PM posted to sci.astro,sci.physics
Uncle Al
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 697
Default How early can life have started? 12 billion years ago!

Yousuf Khan wrote:

Or at least that's the theory put forward by two scientists. They are
calculating how early several essential ingredients of life may have
started in the universe and when they would've been in enough abundance
to start forming life somewhere in the Universe.

[snip]

So sad.

Google Images
miller urey 8520 hits

--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2
  #5  
Old June 17th 09, 09:09 PM posted to sci.astro,sci.physics
john240509
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2
Default How early can life have started? 12 billion years ago!

On Jun 17, 1:53 pm, Uncle Al wrote:
Yousuf Khan wrote:

Or at least that's the theory put forward by two scientists. They are
calculating how early several essential ingredients of life may have
started in the universe and when they would've been in enough abundance
to start forming life somewhere in the Universe.


[snip]

So sad.

Google Images
miller urey 8520 hits

--

The only way EVERY point can observe uniform
red-shifting is if it is solely due to the effect
of distance on the light.
Translation: no expansion
  #6  
Old June 18th 09, 12:51 AM posted to sci.astro,sci.physics
John Curtis
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 93
Default How early can life have started? 12 billion years ago!

On Jun 17, 10:59*am, Yousuf Khan wrote:
Or at least that's the theory put forward by two scientists. They are
calculating how early several essential ingredients of life may have
started in the universe and when they would've been in enough abundance
to start forming life somewhere in the Universe.

Oxygen begins to bind hydrogen at sunspot temperatures ~3200 K.
The atmospheres of K and M stars are awash with water.
http://www.aanda.org/index.php?optio...34/aade292.pdf
Below 3200 K, water is the primary substrate of interstellar
chemistry:
C + H2O -- CO, the marker (maser) for interstellar hydrogen
Si + H20 -- SiO4, the anion of olivine FeMgSiO4, the pincipal
component of circumstellar dust.
John Curtis

  #7  
Old June 18th 09, 01:29 AM posted to sci.astro,sci.physics
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)[_498_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1
Default How early can life have started? 12 billion years ago!

Dear john240509:

"john240509" wrote in message
...
....
The only way EVERY point can observe uniform
red-shifting is if it is solely due to the effect
of distance on the light.
Translation: no expansion


No. Translation, distance changes are the same for all points at
a given age. Aka. expansion with allowance for acceleration.

David A. Smith


  #8  
Old June 18th 09, 01:53 AM posted to sci.astro,sci.physics
Androcles[_8_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,135
Default How early can life have started? 12 billion years ago!


"N:dlzc D:aol T:com (dlzc)" wrote in message
...
Dear john240509:

"john240509" wrote in message
...
...
The only way EVERY point can observe uniform
red-shifting is if it is solely due to the effect
of distance on the light.
Translation: no expansion


No. Translation, distance changes are the same for all points at a given
age. Aka. expansion with allowance for acceleration.

David A. Smith


Deer N:dlzc D:aol T:com (dlzc):
No. Translation, the pencil is bent if you can see it is.
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu...ic/brokpen.jpg

BTW... idiot.







  #9  
Old June 18th 09, 02:54 AM posted to sci.astro,sci.physics
Yousuf Khan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 594
Default How early can life have started? 12 billion years ago!

Sam Wormley wrote:
Yousuf Khan wrote:
Sam Wormley wrote:
H, C, N, O should be sufficient... the latter three produced in the
first generation of stars.



Well, actually, they say that it took a bit longer for C & N to form,
since the first generation of stars were likely behemoths that blew up
quickly and produced a lot of iron and magnesium. Later generations of
small and medium sized stars were needed to form C, N, O.

Yousuf Khan


You are wrong... look up stellar evolution... stars can't fuse magnesium
(and eventually iron) directly from hydrogen (or helium).


That's not what I said, I said that when those behemoths blow up, they
will have already fused a lot of iron and magnesium in their cores which
are then spread around by the explosion. The percentage of C, N, & O are
smaller in these massive cores, presumably because they've been consumed
to produce the Fe and Mg. No one said anything about fusing hydrogen or
helium directly to Mg & Fe.

Yousuf Khan
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Two blue blood vessel remains beautifully preserved—one on Mars for 3 billion years, the other in Pennsylvania for 300 million years. Lin Liangtai Amateur Astronomy 0 July 9th 08 03:47 PM
Two blue blood vessel remains beautifully preserved—one on Mars for 3 billion years, the other in Pennsylvania for 300 million years. Lin Liangtai Astronomy Misc 0 July 9th 08 03:47 PM
Humanity could live for 5 billion years but will likely go extinct in the next 100,000 years ultimate Renewables and when Economics and humanity die out a_plutonium Astronomy Misc 8 September 26th 06 09:36 AM
Article-M. Livio "...carbon-based life...7 billion years ago." Jason H. SETI 2 April 26th 04 05:09 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:52 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.