![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Chris Marriott wrote:
The first "powered flights" were powered airships. I have a vague feeling (but no more than that) that it was a Frenchman who first did that. Presumably you were referring to powered flight by a "heavier than air" machine? I'm not sure. I thought the Wright Brothers flew in December 1903, not quite 100 years ago. Count Ferdinand and his zeppelin flew in July 1900. The Brothers Montgolfier flew in the late eighteenth century, well before any of the directed flights. (In fact, the zeppelin is also called the dirigible, isn't it?) Brian Tung The Astronomy Corner at http://astro.isi.edu/ Unofficial C5+ Home Page at http://astro.isi.edu/c5plus/ The PleiadAtlas Home Page at http://astro.isi.edu/pleiadatlas/ My Own Personal FAQ (SAA) at http://astro.isi.edu/reference/faq.txt |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 21 Jul 2003 13:25:35 -0400, bwhiting
wrote: Dec 17, 1903....Kittyhawk, NC. USA Orv and Wilber Wright from Dayton, Ohio USA You're mssing the point...what transpired within the lifetime of an average person from the Wrights to Armstrong. Dennis |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You're mssing the point...what transpired within the lifetime of an
average person from the Wrights to Armstrong. No, you're missing the point. Only one of these anniversaries occurred yesterday, not two as your first post states. -- Curtis Croulet Temecula, California 33° 27' 59"N, 117° 05' 53"W |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 21 Jul 2003 12:47:25 -0700, "Curtis Croulet"
wrote: You're mssing the point...what transpired within the lifetime of an average person from the Wrights to Armstrong. No, you're missing the point. Only one of these anniversaries occurred yesterday, not two as your first post states. Well, I have to discredit NPR for the information, and wonder why John Glenn and Neil Armstrong appeared in Dayton at the Wright brothers memorial yesterday. It was said to commemorate the joint anniversaries of the two events. In any event, what's wondrous is that humans did both within such a short time span. Dennis |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 21 Jul 2003 21:09:09 GMT, Pierre Vandevenne
wrote: wrote in news:8sjohvoio3ptmr84r2hmp5mnf286e3l2pk@ 4ax.com: of the two events. In any event, what's wondrous is that humans did both within such a short time span. and somewhat unfortunate that they did not do much in the years that followed... :-( I was six in 1969 and I am deeply disappointed that we haven't moved ahead, even if I understand that the economics are against it. I bet I'll die before anyone sets a foot on Mars.. that's a pity. Yep...it's all just a matter of will...of which there is little today for this adventure. Cheers. Dennis |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
An air ship does not fly, it floats. Bouyancy keeps an air ship aloft
while aerodynamic lift keeps an airplane aloft. Your turn to spit into the wind. Chris Marriott wrote: wrote in message news ![]() There were two important anniversaries yesterday...one, the first powered flight by humans 100 years ago...two, the 34th anniversary of Armstrong's walk on the moon. Amazing that just 66 years separate the two events, less than the lifespan of a person. Both events done by Americans, too... astonishingly good stuff. Hi Dennis, The first "powered flights" were powered airships. I have a vague feeling (but no more than that) that it was a Frenchman who first did that. Presumably you were referring to powered flight by a "heavier than air" machine? Regards, Chris |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote in message
news ![]() There were two important anniversaries yesterday...one, the first powered flight by humans 100 years ago...two, the 34th anniversary of Armstrong's walk on the moon. Amazing that just 66 years separate the two events, less than the lifespan of a person. Both events done by Americans, too... astonishingly good stuff. Cheers, Dennis I just got back from a family reunion. One of the stories we recalled was my grandfather (b. 1896) telling us about his beginning reading lessons as he read stories in the newspaper making fun of people trying to fly. He told us this story in 1972 as we were watching live TV coverage from the Moon. He was one of the people who's life spanned the events you refer to. Actually the progress in aviation was concentrated in two spurts. From the first heavier-than-air controlled flight in 1903 it only took 24 years until Lindbergh flew non-stop solo across the Atlantic. The next quarter century was a period of refinement. Airplanes in WWII looked similar to Lindbergh's. Following WWII, it took just over 20 years to get from the first supersonic flight (1948) to the first trip to the moon. If you look at planes in use today, they look very similar to the planes of 30 years ago. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ron Andrews wrote:
wrote in message news ![]() There were two important anniversaries yesterday...one, the first powered flight by humans 100 years ago...two, the 34th anniversary of Armstrong's walk on the moon. Amazing that just 66 years separate the two events, less than the lifespan of a person. Both events done by Americans, too... astonishingly good stuff. Cheers, Dennis I just got back from a family reunion. One of the stories we recalled was my grandfather (b. 1896) telling us about his beginning reading lessons as he read stories in the newspaper making fun of people trying to fly. He told us this story in 1972 as we were watching live TV coverage from the Moon. He was one of the people who's life spanned the events you refer to. Actually the progress in aviation was concentrated in two spurts. From the first heavier-than-air controlled flight in 1903 it only took 24 years until Lindbergh flew non-stop solo across the Atlantic. The next quarter century was a period of refinement. Airplanes in WWII looked similar to Lindbergh's. Following WWII, it took just over 20 years to get from the first supersonic flight (1948) to the first trip to the moon. If you look at planes in use today, they look very similar to the planes of 30 years ago. Ron, I don't think the stealth fighter and bomber version look anything like planes of 30 years ago.....even the SR-71....a 21st century aircraft that happened to fall into the 20th century, thanks to the excellent work done at the Skunk Works, looks nothing like other aircraft of its day, or even today. (Well, maybe the F-104, but that's all). Other than that, then I agree with you. Clear skies, Tom W. (former Nam pilot) |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ron Andrews wrote:
I just got back from a family reunion. One of the stories we recalled was my grandfather (b. 1896) telling us about his beginning reading lessons as he read stories in the newspaper making fun of people trying to fly. He told us this story in 1972 as we were watching live TV coverage from the Moon. He was one of the people who's life spanned the events you refer to. I once asked my grandmother (b. 1892) if she remembered the Wright Brothers first flight. She said she remembered stories about it but no one believed it. Mike Simmons |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tracy wrote in message ...
An air ship does not fly, it floats. Bouyancy keeps an air ship aloft while aerodynamic lift keeps an airplane aloft. Your turn to spit into the wind. While I don't normally wish to appear (even slightly) argumentative. One might reasonably suggest that a powered airship does in fact fly. It may well rely on floatation for the bulk of its lift. But the tailplanes are (& were) of (fairly conventional) aerofoil cross section. By being driven forwards (or even backwards) by the motors. The direction and lift/sink of the body is greatly modified by these (often adjustable)lifting surfaces. The geometry of the motors themselves is often highly adjustable to further increase the directional control. Couldn't one call this "flying"? Does the skilled "driver" of an airship have a pilots license or that of a balloonist? I'll pass on the argument regarding the directional changes afforded. By raising or lowering a conventional balloon. By means of added heat, venting or reducing ballast into variable wind direction at different altitudes. Can't this also be called "flying"? Though "ballooning" is indeed the common term applied to the latter activity. Probably for romantic & nostalgic reasons. (Montgolfier et al) Makes yer spit! Don't it? Chris.B.Pedant |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Bacteria discovered in 4,000 feet of rock fuels Mars comparison (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 0 | December 31st 03 04:57 PM |
UFO Activities from Biblical Times | Kazmer Ujvarosy | Astronomy Misc | 0 | December 25th 03 05:21 AM |
Was there a civilization that existed 13 000 years ago? | Paul R. Mays | Astronomy Misc | 554 | November 13th 03 12:15 PM |
12-FOOT FOSSIL MAN Found 475 Feet Underground | Ed Conrad | Astronomy Misc | 4 | October 29th 03 03:21 AM |
News: Brits with altitude prepare to float into space in a giant balloon | Rusty Barton | Policy | 1 | July 11th 03 07:59 PM |