![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
So far most of the bursts seen are a long way away, and the levels of
radiation here are thus small, but it makes you think what might be the result if a large star in our generalneighbourhood blew up in a similar way. Admittedly, these early blasts were from stars with a different make up to the currently seen ones, but still, radiation and its ramifications could well be why life on the planet is only continued through sexual means in order to correct for radiation induced errors in dna. OK so Oxygen and other side effects of reactive elements play their part in the changes, but it does make you wonder about the fate of any life which got going in the earlier days of the Universe when these large explosions seem to be very common. Brian -- Brian Gaff - Note:- In order to reduce spam, any email without 'Brian Gaff' in the display name may be lost. Blind user, so no pictures please! |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 11:45:32 GMT, "Brian Gaff"
wrote: So far most of the bursts seen are a long way away, and the levels of radiation here are thus small, but it makes you think what might be the result if a large star in our generalneighbourhood blew up in a similar way. Admittedly, these early blasts were from stars with a different make up to the currently seen ones, but still, radiation and its ramifications could well be why life on the planet is only continued through sexual means in order to correct for radiation induced errors in dna. OK so Oxygen and other side effects of reactive elements play their part in the changes, but it does make you wonder about the fate of any life which got going in the earlier days of the Universe when these large explosions seem to be very common. Brian Seems to me life wouldn't have gotten started that early in the universe. Not enough starts would have gone supernova to seed heavier elements through any gas clouds that second-generation stars (and planets) would have formed from. Maybe only 3rd-gen stars (and stable ones at that, like Sol) provide the right conditions for life to evolve(?) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Gamma Bursts ????? | G=EMC^2 Glazier[_1_] | Misc | 0 | March 23rd 08 08:15 PM |
Gamma Ray Bursts | Vernon Balbert | Misc | 0 | January 9th 08 03:19 PM |
Gamma Ray Bursts: what percentage do we observe on earth ? | blackboab | Astronomy Misc | 5 | January 9th 08 02:30 AM |
Gamma-Ray Bursts and the Earth: Exploration of Atmospheric, Biological, Climatic and Biogeochemical Effects | Joseph Lazio | SETI | 0 | May 24th 05 12:43 PM |
We have cosmic-ray-bursts, we have gamma-ray-bursts, what else do wehave? V838 | Archimedes Plutonium | Astronomy Misc | 0 | July 14th 03 06:24 PM |