![]() |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My last two attempts to get the Running Man out to my server and others
seems to have failed. It was finally picked up by http://www.usenet-replayer.com/webrings/astro.html The first post that is. Second seems to have vanished totally. I don't know why I'm trying again but here is a very old M12. It was made from 2 minute exposures and very few of those! Clouds must have cut things short. In any case like M38 and NGC1977 it was found during the latest drive cleaning. How I missed them in previous cleanings I don't know. Anyway for what it is worth here's a very under exposed M12, 10 minutes luminosity 6 minutes each color. I should have combined all 11 images for a pseudo lum but just now thought of it. Oh well. There are a pair of galaxies at the lower right (southwest) edge of the cluster. The brighter one is PGC 1103219 (2MASX J16470200-0202314 ID). The dimmer is anonymous as far as I can tell. A lot more exposure time would have picked them up a lot better. 14" LX200R @ f/10, L=5x2' RGB=3x2 (all binned 2x2), STL-11000XM, Paramount ME Rick -- Correct domain name is arvig and it is net not com. Prefix is correct. Third character is a zero rather than a capital "Oh". |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Nice picture Rick. I think I only imaged M12 once and wasn't very satisfied
with the result as it is quite low, where seeing is usually bad. All your recent posts made it on my newsserver btw, but I have been away for some days for some irish setdancing and did not have internet access there. Stefan "Rick Johnson" schrieb im Newsbeitrag ster.com... My last two attempts to get the Running Man out to my server and others seems to have failed. It was finally picked up by http://www.usenet-replayer.com/webrings/astro.html The first post that is. Second seems to have vanished totally. I don't know why I'm trying again but here is a very old M12. It was made from 2 minute exposures and very few of those! Clouds must have cut things short. In any case like M38 and NGC1977 it was found during the latest drive cleaning. How I missed them in previous cleanings I don't know. Anyway for what it is worth here's a very under exposed M12, 10 minutes luminosity 6 minutes each color. I should have combined all 11 images for a pseudo lum but just now thought of it. Oh well. There are a pair of galaxies at the lower right (southwest) edge of the cluster. The brighter one is PGC 1103219 (2MASX J16470200-0202314 ID). The dimmer is anonymous as far as I can tell. A lot more exposure time would have picked them up a lot better. 14" LX200R @ f/10, L=5x2' RGB=3x2 (all binned 2x2), STL-11000XM, Paramount ME Rick -- Correct domain name is arvig and it is net not com. Prefix is correct. Third character is a zero rather than a capital "Oh". |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yes, it seems to get to Europe fine but not my side of the ocean. Three
tries on Running Man and Space Banter is yet to pick it up! Actually I took about 60 two minute shots of M12 but most were so fuzzy they were unusable. I picked the three best for each color, none were really sharp, and the 5 luminosity shots that were much clearer than the others. Adding any more just made things worse. I didn't try using all 11 for a pseudo luminosity image. Might have helped but might have hurt as some of the blue frames were not very good. I'll have to try again under better conditions later this year. Rick Stefan Lilge wrote: Nice picture Rick. I think I only imaged M12 once and wasn't very satisfied with the result as it is quite low, where seeing is usually bad. All your recent posts made it on my newsserver btw, but I have been away for some days for some irish setdancing and did not have internet access there. Stefan "Rick Johnson" schrieb im Newsbeitrag ster.com... My last two attempts to get the Running Man out to my server and others seems to have failed. It was finally picked up by http://www.usenet-replayer.com/webrings/astro.html The first post that is. Second seems to have vanished totally. I don't know why I'm trying again but here is a very old M12. It was made from 2 minute exposures and very few of those! Clouds must have cut things short. In any case like M38 and NGC1977 it was found during the latest drive cleaning. How I missed them in previous cleanings I don't know. Anyway for what it is worth here's a very under exposed M12, 10 minutes luminosity 6 minutes each color. I should have combined all 11 images for a pseudo lum but just now thought of it. Oh well. There are a pair of galaxies at the lower right (southwest) edge of the cluster. The brighter one is PGC 1103219 (2MASX J16470200-0202314 ID). The dimmer is anonymous as far as I can tell. A lot more exposure time would have picked them up a lot better. 14" LX200R @ f/10, L=5x2' RGB=3x2 (all binned 2x2), STL-11000XM, Paramount ME Rick -- Correct domain name is arvig and it is net not com. Prefix is correct. Third character is a zero rather than a capital "Oh". -- Correct domain name is arvig and it is net not com. Prefix is correct. Third character is a zero rather than a capital "Oh". |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[sci.astro,sci.astro.seti] Contents (Astronomy Frequently Asked Questions) (0/9) | [email protected] | SETI | 0 | May 3rd 07 01:08 AM |
[sci.astro,sci.astro.seti] Contents (Astronomy Frequently Asked Questions) (0/9) | [email protected] | SETI | 0 | May 3rd 06 12:33 PM |
[sci.astro,sci.astro.seti] Contents (Astronomy Frequently Asked Questions) (0/9) | [email protected] | SETI | 0 | October 6th 05 02:34 AM |
[sci.astro,sci.astro.seti] Contents (Astronomy Frequently Asked Questions) (0/9) | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | September 30th 04 02:23 AM |
[sci.astro,sci.astro.seti] Contents (Astronomy Frequently Asked Questions) (0/9) | [email protected] | SETI | 0 | September 30th 04 02:23 AM |