![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
YEE- HAAAW
Get 'em Paine. Make the VS'er "fill in the blank", put up or shaddap. How 'bout explaining the _ mechanism of causation_ by which "attraction" literally POWERS the stellar collapse that powers the fusion that rebounds as a supernova blast. How does "attraction" crush a massive star down to the neutron star of BH state? How does "attraction" POWER the far more energetic and *sustained* process of a quasar? By golly, let 'em step right up and fill in the blank_________. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"oldcoot" wrote in message...
... YEE- HAAAW Get 'em Paine. Make the VS'er "fill in the blank", put up or shaddap. How 'bout explaining the _ mechanism of causation_ by which "attraction" literally POWERS the stellar collapse that powers the fusion that rebounds as a supernova blast. How does "attraction" crush a massive star down to the neutron star of BH state? How does "attraction" POWER the far more energetic and *sustained* process of a quasar? By golly, let 'em step right up and fill in the blank_________. Your enthusiasm is inspiring and contagious, oc! happy holidays and... starry starry nights! -- Indelibly yours, Paine Ellsworth P.S. "The belief that there is only one truth, and that oneself is in possession of it, is the root of all evil in the world." Max Born, quantum physicist, and Olivia Newton John's grandfather! P.P.S.: http://yummycake.secretsgolden.com http://garden-of-ebooks.blogspot.com http://painellsworth.net |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Typo
Oc writ, How does "attraction" crush a massive star down to the neutron star of BH state? Should read , ..`or' BH state. Damn, gotta remember to proofread stuff. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 19, 2:00*pm, (oldcoot) wrote:
YEE- HAAAW * * * * * * * * *Get 'em Paine. Make the VS'er "fill in the blank", put up or shaddap. How 'bout explaining the _ mechanism of causation_ by which "attraction" literally POWERS the stellar collapse that powers the fusion that rebounds as a supernova blast. How does "attraction" crush a massive star down to the neutron star of BH state? How does "attraction" POWER the far more energetic and *sustained* process of a quasar? By golly, let 'em step right up and fill in the blank_________. Let us not forget Newton's statement: "That one body may act upon another at a Distance thro' a Vacuum, without the Mediation of anything else, by and through which their Action and Force may be conveyed from one to another, is to me so great an absurdity, that I believe no Man who has in philosophical Matters a competent Faculty of thinking can ever fall into it." - Sir Isaac Newton Double-A |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
AA wrote,
Let us not forget Newton's statement: "That one body may act upon another at a Distance thro' a Vacuum, without the Mediation of anything else, by and through which their Action and Force may be conveyed from one to another, is to me so great an absurdity, that I believe no Man who has in philosophical Matters a competent Faculty of thinking can ever fall into it." - Sir Isaac Newton Unknown to Newton in his day is the *flowing, accelerating medium of space* as that which does the "Mediating". He would be pleased to know that the FS model of gravity brings his observations of gravity full circle and fully validates them, including its instantaneity irrespective of distance (gravity's "speed of charge", not to be confused with velocity of spaceflow). |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"oldcoot" wrote in message...
... AA wrote, Let us not forget Newton's statement: "That one body may act upon another at a Distance thro' a Vacuum, without the Mediation of anything else, by and through which their Action and Force may be conveyed from one to another, is to me so great an absurdity, that I believe no Man who has in philosophical Matters a competent Faculty of thinking can ever fall into it." - Sir Isaac Newton Unknown to Newton in his day is the *flowing, accelerating medium of space* as that which does the "Mediating". He would be pleased to know that the FS model of gravity brings his observations of gravity full circle and fully validates them, including its instantaneity irrespective of distance (gravity's "speed of charge", not to be confused with velocity of spaceflow). IIRC, Einstein hated action-at-distance about as much as Newton did. And spent the bulk of his life trying to figure out how the heck it took place. It was quantum mechanics with their introduction of the graviton xfer particle that finally gave physics what they thought, and *still* think, is the "Mediator". happy holidays and... starry starry nights! -- Indelibly yours, Paine Ellsworth P.S. "Learning never exhausts the mind." Leonardo da Vinci P.P.S.: http://yummycake.secretsgolden.com http://garden-of-ebooks.blogspot.com http://painellsworth.net |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
An Attractive Proposition (was - Space Elevator is itpossible?) | oldcoot[_2_] | Misc | 1 | December 19th 08 08:41 PM |
so THAT's what a space elevator is? | [email protected] | Space Shuttle | 6 | February 9th 08 01:12 PM |
Space elevator now possible? | Robert Clark | Policy | 194 | January 21st 05 02:49 AM |
Space elevator now possible? | Robert Clark | Astronomy Misc | 141 | January 21st 05 02:49 AM |
Proposition to Bert | BenignVanilla | Misc | 21 | February 24th 04 08:43 AM |