Global Warming is about giving your government more regulatory powerand your eventual enslavment.

BENIGN SOLUTIONS FOR GOLBAL WARMING
www.alaskapublishing.com

I have been on a quest to alter societal evolution into a more
benign
directions with my books, COSMOLOGICAL ICE AGES AND GLOBAL WARMING and
PHILOSOPHER’S STONE.
My book, COSMOLOGICAL ICE AGES explains how the carbon resources were
made. Our sun is in a 105,000-year elliptical orbit around the Procyon
and Sirius star systems. After reading about the direction our sun is
traveling through space I plotted our course from Orion toward
Hercules and in the process discovered that we are in orbit around the
Sirius A and B which are only 8.5 light years away. We are part of a
cluster of 100 stars ruled by these two giants. Sirius B is a neutron
star of 1.5 earth diameters orbiting 20 earth distances from Sirius A.
Every fifty years it gets so close to Sirius A that it feeds off from
it several metric tons per hour causing it to put out thousands of
times more invisible ultraviolet light than our sun. I am now
convinced that the intense light from Sirius B is responsible for
advanced multi-celled life forms on earth.
Our sun was born with about 40 other stars in an Orion dust cloud not
too far from the Horse Head Nebula currently 1330 light years toward
the center of the Galaxy (toward the Southeast). After our sun was
born and most of the planets formed from dust rings we drifted out in
the Orion Arm toward Hercules (northwest) for two+ billion years.
Galaxies make suns in dust clouds and send them out to make the body
of the galaxy. After our sun was born and the earth formed from dust
around the sun a billion years of volcanism gave earth a thick carbon
dioxide atmosphere of 750 pounds per square inch. {The December
Astronomy magazine mentions that early Earth had an atmosphere of
1,450 pounds per square inch and one third of that was carbon dioxide.
Now Co2 is a trace gas at only .033%. If humans were some how able to
double Co2 it would still be a trace gas at .066%. Human Co2 release
has nothing to do with global warming but it is an excuse to control
us?

Venus is closer to the sun than Earth so the solar wind should have
blown Venus's atmosphere away but it has a Co2 atmosphere of 117
pounds per square inch.

Earth was about one-third smaller diameter at that time. After that,
we (our sun) drifted out into the cold of space for a billion years
and earth had an ice age that lasted one billion years. That's a long
time for nothing to happen. All the oceans were frozen and our sun
didn’t burn as hot as it does today.

After a billion years of being covered with ice, our solar system
drifted between Procyon and Sirius A and B which are over a billion
years older than our sun. These giant stars orbit each other and each
have a total of about 20 times more gravity than our sun. When little,
Sirius B orbiting Sirius A every 54 years came around, it grabbed hold
of our sun and pulled it into orbit around Sirius A because it has 1.5
to 10 times more gravity than our sun. This was fortunate for us
because the light and heat from these giant stars along with the
intense UV 100 times more powerful than our pierced early Earth's
atmosphere, melted the ice on earth and started plants to grow in the
oceans thereby releasing free oxygen. Our brother and sister stars
kept going and are now 50 to 100 light years ahead of us toward the
north and are known as the Constellation Ursa Major (Big Dipper).

Our fortunate capture by the Sirius system happened about 700 million
years ago and this was the beginning of all complex multi-cellular
life forms on earth. During the Carboniferous Era Sirus B laid down
limestone layers up to 12,500 feet thick. The continental United
States from the Rocky Mountains to the Carolinas was laid down at time
with limestone layers on average over 2,500 feet thick. [Look up
Carboniferous Era in Encyclopedia Britannica.] Carbon removed from the
atmosphere during that era was laid down in Pennsylvania and Virginia
as coal layers up to a hundred feet thick. Coal is made from grass and
trees and plants of all kinds. Anthracite or hard coal is compressed
from plant matter at a ration of 40 to 1. Soft coal is compressed down
at a ration of about 20 to 1. The point is, coal, oil, and limestone
are made from carbon dioxide using photosynthesis and ultraviolet
light from space and the majority of it came from Sirius B. Our sun
does not have enough power to keep us out of the ice ages otherwise we
wouldn’t have them! If you want to know more read my book,
COSMOLOGICAL ICE AGES. Go to my web site www.alaskapublishing.com OR
www.GuardDogBooks.com

On 16 Oct, 02:03, Hank Kroll wrote:

My book, COSMOLOGICAL ICE AGES explains how the carbon resources were
made. Our sun is in a 105,000-year elliptical orbit around the Procyon
and Sirius star systems.


What evidence can you provide for this claim?

How many people apart from yourself agree with your claim - where does
their published support (if any) appear?
--
Martin Nicholson - Daventry, UK
http://www.martin-nicholson.info/index.htm
Dealing with John Greaves FAQ
http://www.geocities.com/badastrobuster/index.htm

In article 6hxJk.334622$TT4.282639@attbi_s22,
Sam Wormley wrote:
Hank Kroll wrote:

My book, COSMOLOGICAL ICE AGES explains how the carbon resources were
made. Our sun is in a 105,000-year elliptical orbit around the Procyon
and Sirius star systems.

The observed motions of Sirius and Procyon do not support any notion of
orbital relationship with our sun.

In addition, if the Sun was in such an orbit, the orbital period would
be of the order of several billion years instead of a mere 105 thousand
years. Which means that not many, if any, revolutions in that orbit
would have been completed during the lifetime so far of the Galaxy.
In addition, that "orbit" would be so easily disturbed by other stars
passing nearby that the stars would most likely be scattered from
one another before even half an orbit would have been completed.

An orbital period of a mere 105 thousand years would require an orbital
velocity of some 100 km/s which is way way beyond escape velocity for
such a system.

Hans Kroll has just revealed his total ignorance in orbital mechanics...

--
----------------------------------------------------------------
Paul Schlyter, Grev Turegatan 40, SE-114 38 Stockholm, SWEDEN
e-mail: pausch at stjarnhimlen dot se
WWW: http://stjarnhimlen.se/

On Oct 15, 7:03 pm, Hank Kroll wrote:

The average input of energy the sun imparts to earth is only 350 watts
per square meter because the sun only warms one side of the earth at a
time while the other side is exposed to the cold of space.

Yup. And that's how global warming works. The extra carbon dioxide
means that the Earth's heat doesn't radiate into the cold of space at
night, but just heats up the atmosphere which keeps it in like a warm
blanket. So we get warmer and warmer each day, until a new equilbrium
is reached, and we get so hot that we again radiate as much to space
each night as we get each day.

It doesn't take much to shift that equilibrium.

Oh, and soot is black, so it doesn't reflect sunlight into space; it
absorbs it and turns it to heat too.

John Savard

My book, COSMOLOGICAL ICE AGES explains how the carbon resources were
made. Our sun is in a 105,000-year elliptical orbit around the Procyon
and Sirius star systems.

The observed motions of Sirius and Procyon do not support any notion of
orbital relationship with our sun.

In addition, if the Sun was in such an orbit, the orbital period would

why do you idiots bother with such idiots?

In article eYIJk.2020$%%2.1278@edtnps82,
Michael Tee wrote:

My book, COSMOLOGICAL ICE AGES explains how the carbon resources were
made. Our sun is in a 105,000-year elliptical orbit around the Procyon
and Sirius star systems.

The observed motions of Sirius and Procyon do not support any notion of
orbital relationship with our sun.

In addition, if the Sun was in such an orbit, the orbital period would

why do you idiots bother with such idiots?

Mostly to try to educate others who may read this and who may be unaware
of this. If the idiot loses his "market" of people who are willing
to believe in him, he may eventually go silent. Perhaps I'm an idiot
too when doing this - but I prefer that over becoming a cynic.

--
----------------------------------------------------------------
Paul Schlyter, Grev Turegatan 40, SE-114 38 Stockholm, SWEDEN
e-mail: pausch at stjarnhimlen dot se
WWW: http://stjarnhimlen.se/

On Thu, 16 Oct 2008 16:44:20 GMT, (Paul Schlyter) wrote:

Mostly to try to educate others who may read this and who may be unaware
of this.

Absolutely. When somebody posts something that's more or less on-topic
for this group, and it's factually wrong, a correction is in order.
Where it becomes crazy is when the original poster tries to maintain the
incorrect position- then you need to pull the plug on the argument in a
timely fashion.
_________________________________________________

Chris L Peterson
Cloudbait Observatory
http://www.cloudbait.com

On Oct 16, 12:30*pm, Chris L Peterson wrote:
On Thu, 16 Oct 2008 16:44:20 GMT, (Paul Schlyter) wrote:
Mostly to try to educate others who may read this and who may be unaware
of this.

Absolutely. When somebody posts something that's more or less on-topic
for this group, and it's factually wrong, a correction is in order.
Where it becomes crazy is when the original poster tries to maintain the
incorrect position- then you need to pull the plug on the argument in a
timely fashion.
_________________________________________________

Chris L Peterson
Cloudbait Observatoryhttp://www.cloudbait.com

Natural, long-term cyclical global warming may indeed be occurring.
The notion, however, that it is caused primarily by man-made CO2--
which can be reversed by man--is unproven nonsense propagated by
greens with an agenda who refuse to debate their "science". The so-
called "hockey-stick" computer generated warming graph, for example,
is a fraud! GIGO!

Reminds me of the folks who were predicting "just around the corner"
$200/ barrel oil last summer--the "madness of crowds" is an impressive
thing to watch.

Millions are dying each year of malaria, for, example, that could be
eradicated with DDT ( as was done in the US with NO proven adverse
human side effects ). How about that for a cause? Or current
starvation in many countries?

On Oct 16, 11:05*pm, "
wrote:

Natural, long-term cyclical global warming may indeed be occurring.
The notion, however, that it is caused primarily by man-made CO2--
which can be reversed by man--is unproven nonsense propagated by
greens with an agenda who refuse to debate their "science". The so-
called "hockey-stick" computer generated warming graph, for example,
is a fraud! GIGO!

Reminds me of the folks who were predicting "just around the corner"
$200/ barrel oil last summer--the "madness of crowds" is an impressive
thing to watch.

Millions are dying each year of malaria, for, example, that could be
eradicated with DDT ( as was done in the US with NO proven adverse
human side effects ). How about that for a cause? Or current
starvation in many countries?

It is fortunate for your argument that there is little political will
to change past and present behaviours. So the proof of man's
involvement in global warming is literally just around the corner. No
country has matched its promises on cutting back on their CO2 release.
Most have increased their CO2 dramatically. The Arctic is already
setting records for summer ice loss which is not being replaced in the
winters. There is hardly a glacier anywhere on the globe which has not
lost the will to live. Extreme weather is already a regular phenomenon
around the world. The global bread baskets are turning to saline dust.
Even an optimist, like yourself, must recognise we are close to the
tipping point. Will the North resist the pressures for completely open
borders to save billions from starvation and extreme heat with
consequent desertification only to have nothing to offer in the way of
food, housing, health care and social security?. Around 1/6th of the
world's population is already hungry. A similar number live in mega-
slums with no land to grow their own food. Following present trends
It is going to get very ugly indeed within as little as 10-15 years.
Perhaps you should pray for a painless pandemic?

On Thu, 16 Oct 2008 14:05:36 -0700 (PDT), "
wrote:

Natural, long-term cyclical global warming may indeed be occurring.
The notion, however, that it is caused primarily by man-made CO2--
which can be reversed by man--is unproven nonsense propagated by
greens with an agenda who refuse to debate their "science"...

Similarly, when somebody other than the OP steps in with factually
incorrect information, which he'll defend in the face of clear and
obvious evidence to the contrary, you also need to pull the plug...
_________________________________________________

Chris L Peterson
Cloudbait Observatory
http://www.cloudbait.com