A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » History
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Squabbles at The Planetary Society



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 18th 08, 12:40 PM posted to sci.space.history,sci.space.policy
Pat Flannery
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 18,465
Default Squabbles at The Planetary Society

Harrison Schmitt jumps ship over new Mars/asteroids agenda:
http://www.nasawatch.com/archives/20..._nac_chai.html

Pat
  #2  
Old November 19th 08, 01:27 AM posted to sci.space.history,sci.space.policy
jonathan[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 485
Default Squabbles at The Planetary Society


"Pat Flannery" wrote in message
dakotatelephone...
Harrison Schmitt jumps ship over new Mars/asteroids agenda:
http://www.nasawatch.com/archives/20..._nac_chai.html




I love this line....


"You know as well as I, the "global warming scare" is being used
as a political tool to increase government control over American
lives, incomes and decision making. It has no place in the
Society's activities."


Studying the climate of Earth from space has no business in our
space policy???

A person like this shouldn't be given the responsibility of running
an ice cream stand. Why should we care about his opinion?








Pat



  #3  
Old November 19th 08, 02:07 AM posted to sci.space.history,sci.space.policy
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 237
Default Squabbles at The Planetary Society

On Nov 18, 8:27 pm, "jonathan" wrote:

I love this line....

"You know as well as I, the "global warming scare" is being used
as a political tool to increase government control over American
lives, incomes and decision making. It has no place in the
Society's activities."

Studying the climate of Earth from space has no business in our
space policy???


No, politicians shouldn't use an emotional bullet point to increase
government control.

A person like this shouldn't be given the responsibility of running
an ice cream stand. Why should we care about his opinion?


I've always said that about politicians.
  #4  
Old November 19th 08, 04:39 PM posted to sci.space.history,sci.space.policy
Eric Chomko[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,853
Default Squabbles at The Planetary Society

On Nov 18, 8:27*pm, "jonathan" wrote:
"Pat Flannery" wrote in message

dakotatelephone...

Harrison Schmitt jumps ship over new Mars/asteroids agenda:
http://www.nasawatch.com/archives/20..._nac_chai.html


I love this line....

"You know as well as I, the "global warming scare" is being used
as a political tool to increase government control over American
lives, incomes and decision making. It has no place in the
Society's activities."

Studying the climate of Earth from space has no business in our
space policy???

A person like this shouldn't be given the responsibility of running
an ice cream stand. Why should we care about his opinion?


It is almost as if he is jealous that spacecraft are being used for
Earth observation and that Global Warming is simply an excuse use to
take dollars away from his more lofty goal of other planetary
exploration.

Yep people like that are more than irresponsible.
  #5  
Old November 19th 08, 04:41 PM posted to sci.space.history,sci.space.policy
Eric Chomko[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,853
Default Squabbles at The Planetary Society

On Nov 18, 9:07*pm, " wrote:
On Nov 18, 8:27 pm, "jonathan" wrote:



I love this line....


"You know as well as I, the "global warming scare" is being used
as a political tool to increase government control over American
lives, incomes and decision making. It has no place in the
Society's activities."


Studying the climate of Earth from space has no business in our
space policy???


No, politicians shouldn't use an emotional bullet point to increase
government control.


Only problem is is that other politicians counter 180 degrees and do
nothing where something (not hysteria) should be done.


A person like this shouldn't be given the responsibility of running
an ice cream stand. Why should we care about his opinion?


I've always said that about politicians.


Politicians should NOT make scientific decisions.
  #6  
Old November 19th 08, 05:59 PM posted to sci.space.history,sci.space.policy
Pat Flannery
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 18,465
Default Squabbles at The Planetary Society



Eric Chomko wrote:
I've always said that about politicians.


Politicians should NOT make scientific decisions.


Based on the Texas legislature, who once passed a law that Pi equaled 3.0.
Meanwhile, back in Texas:
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/..._Rt2AD94HNPAG0
Yup, what goes around comes around, doesn't it? :-D

Pat
  #7  
Old November 19th 08, 06:25 PM posted to sci.space.history,sci.space.policy
Rand Simberg[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8,311
Default Squabbles at The Planetary Society

On Wed, 19 Nov 2008 11:59:14 -0600, in a place far, far away, Pat
Flannery made the phosphor on my monitor glow in
such a way as to indicate that:



Eric Chomko wrote:
I've always said that about politicians.


Politicians should NOT make scientific decisions.


Based on the Texas legislature, who once passed a law that Pi equaled 3.0.


That never happened.
  #8  
Old November 19th 08, 08:15 PM posted to sci.space.history,sci.space.policy
Damien Valentine
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 273
Default Squabbles at The Planetary Society

On Nov 19, 12:25*pm, (Rand Simberg)
wrote:

Based on the Texas legislature, who once passed a law that Pi equaled 3.0.

  #9  
Old November 19th 08, 08:20 PM posted to sci.space.history,sci.space.policy
kT
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 5,032
Default Squabbles at The Planetary Society

Damien Valentine wrote:
On Nov 19, 12:25 pm, (Rand Simberg)
wrote:

Based on the Texas legislature, who once passed a law that Pi equaled 3.0.

That never happened.


Mr. Simberg is right, and it never happened in Alabama or Tennesee
either. See Snopes for details.


Clearly 3.0 is too low. 3.2 is a better approximation :

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indiana_Pi_Bill

  #10  
Old November 19th 08, 08:23 PM posted to sci.space.history,sci.space.policy
Rand Simberg[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8,311
Default Squabbles at The Planetary Society

On Wed, 19 Nov 2008 12:15:16 -0800 (PST), in a place far, far away,
Damien Valentine made the phosphor on my monitor
glow in such a way as to indicate that:

On Nov 19, 12:25*pm, (Rand Simberg)
wrote:

Based on the Texas legislature, who once passed a law that Pi equaled 3.0.


That never happened.


Mr. Simberg is right, and it never happened in Alabama or Tennesee
either. See Snopes for details.


I think that the closest any state ever came to it was Indiana.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indiana_Pi_Bill

But as it points out, even then it wasn't as simple as declaring pi
three.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Squabbles at The Planetary Society Pat Flannery Policy 59 November 23rd 08 05:34 AM
The Planetary Society - Unskilled and Unaware Of It. kT Policy 11 February 17th 08 06:42 PM
The Planetary Society - Unskilled and Unaware Of It. kT History 11 February 17th 08 06:42 PM
The Planetary Society Rigo Muniz Astronomy Misc 0 February 2nd 05 01:24 PM
Planetary Society re BOINC Jason H. SETI 0 September 29th 03 06:24 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:47 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.