Foolish reporters will tell you this was not a Martian animal andthese were not numerous Martian cells, etc.

Foolish reporters will tell you this (Fig. 1) was not a Martian animal
and these (Fig. 2) were not numerous Martian cells, because NASA is
not scheduled to verify such things until the next Mars mission.

Martian animal is in Fig. 1.
Numerous Martian cell remains are in Fig. 2.
Silts are in Fig. 3.
Foolish reporters cannot tell silts from cells, as both have a size of
2 micrometers to 60 micrometers. The difference between the two in two-
dimensional photos is that silts have sharp angles while cells don't
(See Ref. 1).
Fig. 1:
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?...555128108&p=15

Fig. 2:
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?...555314562&p=93

Fig. 3:
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?...55343375&p=100

Ref. 1:
http://environment.uwe.ac.uk/geocal/...n/soilclas.htm

Please stay inside the mental home as you are supposed to looney!!!



"Lin Liangtai" skrev i en meddelelse
...
Foolish reporters will tell you this (Fig. 1) was not a Martian animal
and these (Fig. 2) were not numerous Martian cells, because NASA is
not scheduled to verify such things until the next Mars mission.

Martian animal is in Fig. 1.
Numerous Martian cell remains are in Fig. 2.
Silts are in Fig. 3.
Foolish reporters cannot tell silts from cells, as both have a size of
2 micrometers to 60 micrometers. The difference between the two in two-
dimensional photos is that silts have sharp angles while cells don't
(See Ref. 1).
Fig. 1:
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?...555128108&p=15

Fig. 2:
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?...555314562&p=93

Fig. 3:
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?...55343375&p=100

Ref. 1:
http://environment.uwe.ac.uk/geocal/...n/soilclas.htm

Starman wrote:

Please stay inside the mental home as you are supposed to looney!!!


is a disrupter - not crazy. you arethe crazy one?




"Lin Liangtai" skrev i en meddelelse
...
Foolish reporters will tell you this (Fig. 1) was not a Martian animal
and these (Fig. 2) were not numerous Martian cells, because NASA is
not scheduled to verify such things until the next Mars mission.

Martian animal is in Fig. 1.
Numerous Martian cell remains are in Fig. 2.
Silts are in Fig. 3.
Foolish reporters cannot tell silts from cells, as both have a size of
2 micrometers to 60 micrometers. The difference between the two in two-
dimensional photos is that silts have sharp angles while cells don't
(See Ref. 1).
Fig. 1:
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?...555128108&p=15

Fig. 2:
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?...555314562&p=93

Fig. 3:
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?...55343375&p=100

Ref. 1:
http://environment.uwe.ac.uk/geocal/...n/soilclas.htm

On Sep 23, 1:36*pm, jerry warner wrote:
Starman wrote:
Please stay inside the mental home as you are supposed to looney!!!

is a disrupter - not crazy. you arethe crazy one?





"Lin Liangtai" skrev i en meddelelse
....
Foolish reporters will tell you this (Fig. 1) was not a Martian animal
and these (Fig. 2) were not numerous Martian cells, because NASA is
not scheduled to verify such things until the next Mars mission.

Martian animal is in Fig. 1.
Numerous Martian cell remains are in Fig. 2.
Silts are in Fig. 3.
Foolish reporters cannot tell silts from cells, as both have a size of
2 micrometers to 60 micrometers. The difference between the two in two-
dimensional photos is that silts have sharp angles while cells don't
(See Ref. 1).
Fig. 1:
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?...555128108&p=15

Fig. 2:
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?...555314562&p=93

Fig. 3:
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?...55343375&p=100

Ref. 1:
http://environment.uwe.ac.uk/geocal/.../soilclas.htm- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Foolish reporters WERE fooled as expected on the press conference on
Sept. 29, 2008, although I had warned them ten days ago. In that press
conference, NASA released a photomicrograph saying salt grains (or
particles of salt grains) were in that photomicrograph. In fact, salts
are ten times larger than any grain in that photo. Any naturally
broken salt particles smaller than 100 microns,if there were such
things, could not be rounded as shown in that photo, because all salts
have cube-like crystallines.

No reporters question NASA then or now. No one paid attention to the
mistake by NASA.

Mi no ondersdtand you english

Get the **** back in your mental home

"Lin Liangtai" skrev i en meddelelse
...
On Sep 23, 1:36 pm, jerry warner wrote:
Starman wrote:
Please stay inside the mental home as you are supposed to looney!!!

is a disrupter - not crazy. you arethe crazy one?





"Lin Liangtai" skrev i en meddelelse
...
Foolish reporters will tell you this (Fig. 1) was not a Martian animal
and these (Fig. 2) were not numerous Martian cells, because NASA is
not scheduled to verify such things until the next Mars mission.

Martian animal is in Fig. 1.
Numerous Martian cell remains are in Fig. 2.
Silts are in Fig. 3.
Foolish reporters cannot tell silts from cells, as both have a size of
2 micrometers to 60 micrometers. The difference between the two in two-
dimensional photos is that silts have sharp angles while cells don't
(See Ref. 1).
Fig. 1:
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?...555128108&p=15

Fig. 2:
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?...555314562&p=93

Fig. 3:
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?...55343375&p=100

Ref. 1:
http://environment.uwe.ac.uk/geocal/.../soilclas.htm-
Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Foolish reporters WERE fooled as expected on the press conference on
Sept. 29, 2008, although I had warned them ten days ago. In that press
conference, NASA released a photomicrograph saying salt grains (or
particles of salt grains) were in that photomicrograph. In fact, salts
are ten times larger than any grain in that photo. Any naturally
broken salt particles smaller than 100 microns,if there were such
things, could not be rounded as shown in that photo, because all salts
have cube-like crystallines.

No reporters question NASA then or now. No one paid attention to the
mistake by NASA.