![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
oc Binary asteroids are showing us capture is in. Our Moon was
captured,as all Moons of planets. It is the shortest and simplest theory. Like the three greatest theoretical minds in the world Einstein Bohr,and Glazier told if a theory is short and simple it is best. Bert Glazier |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Are you joking when you say you have:
“ one of the three greatest theoretical minds in the world ” ? Do you seriously think you deserve one or more Nobels ? As I see it, it's as I told Bill: “ After aging has burned me up like a log on the fire, another ‘ log ’ gets toss on the fire, replacing me .. besides me ( i.e. the log ), no one cares. Nothing is going to put you or me back together .. unfortunately for us ( yet fortunately for everyone else ), we're both very replaceable. ”. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 22, 6:00 am, (G=EMC^2 Glazier) wrote:
oc Binary asteroids are showing us capture is in. Our Moon was captured,as all Moons of planets. It is the shortest and simplest theory. Like the three greatest theoretical minds in the world Einstein Bohr,and Glazier told if a theory is short and simple it is best. Bert Glazier I'd give some credit as to a few of those moons emerging from the same kinds of stuff as its mother planet was made of, as well as those derived from the sorts of nasty encounters that bit off or blew out enough substance that eventually became a moon. Otherwise, at least a few of these moons were likely captured upon having lithobraked into something (possibly aerobraking could also have accomplished this task). This is good stuff for our spendy public owned supercomputers to fully simulate in the best of interactive 3D animation eye-candy format. - Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
BEERTbrain is oh so SPECIAL, Jeff! lmao!
As I mentioned once befo Only in his own mind! Saul Levy On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 03:31:34 +0200 (CEST), Jeff?Relf wrote: Are you joking when you say you have: one of the three greatest theoretical minds in the world ? Do you seriously think you deserve one or more Nobels ? As I see it, it's as I told Bill: After aging has burned me up like a log on the fire, another log gets toss on the fire, replacing me .. besides me ( i.e. the log ), no one cares. Nothing is going to put you or me back together .. unfortunately for us ( yet fortunately for everyone else ), we're both very replaceable. . |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jeff The fact I will never get a Nobel does not mean I don't deserve
one. Reality is I am 150 years before my time. I have ideas so far out of the box if I posted them I would be laughed at. Its no fun to have to think alone. That is why I miss my late friend Joe so much. Bert |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cactus saul Reality is we spend 99% of our life only in our
mind(thoughts) Our thoughts are done in words. Our dreams are done in pictures Bert |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm already laughing, BEERTbrain! lmao!
Saul Levy On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 06:40:45 -0400, (G=EMC^2 Glazier) wrote: Jeff The fact I will never get a Nobel does not mean I don't deserve one. Reality is I am 150 years before my time. I have ideas so far out of the box if I posted them I would be laughed at. Its no fun to have to think alone. That is why I miss my late friend Joe so much. Bert |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I dreamed this morning about working on Kitt Peak, BEERTbrain! lmao!
Does that count? Saul Levy On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 06:46:09 -0400, (G=EMC^2 Glazier) wrote: Cactus saul Reality is we spend 99% of our life only in our mind(thoughts) Our thoughts are done in words. Our dreams are done in pictures Bert |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 23, 3:40 am, (G=EMC^2 Glazier) wrote:
Jeff The fact I will never get a Nobel does not mean I don't deserve one. Reality is I am 150 years before my time. I have ideas so far out of the box if I posted them I would be laughed at. Its no fun to have to think alone. That is why I miss my late friend Joe so much. Bert Those few of us that actually care about making a positive/ constructive difference aren't laughing at you so much as laughing along with your far out of box ideas. I'll match any one of your far outside of box ideas with two of mine, and together we might actually get noticed, or perhaps once and for all put away for good (the mainstream status quo would very much like the latter as the best outcome). The question is, should we make this easy or as hard as hell for them Republican Mafia *******s to get rid of us? - Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
2" eye piece | Steve - www.ukspeedtraps.co.uk | UK Astronomy | 5 | December 20th 04 01:51 PM |
tired ot carrying your Losmandy GM-8 out, piece by piece? | [email protected] | Amateur Astronomy | 9 | December 16th 04 05:53 PM |
A REALLY NEAT CLOSE-UP OF COMET NEAT FROM KITT PEAK OBSERVATORY (STScI-NN040617) | INBOX ASTRONOMY: NEWS ALERT | Amateur Astronomy | 30 | June 19th 04 07:41 AM |
Comet Neat - sorta "neat" | Michael Boschat | Amateur Astronomy | 1 | May 11th 04 01:34 AM |
Dynamics of binary asteroids | Patrick Underwood | Technology | 1 | October 23rd 03 02:55 AM |