![]() |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
To me this is obviously true, but I need it confirmed or refuted: for
any given optical train behind a telescope the focal distance -- the distance to a CCD or other flat electronic detector -- must always be the same if the telescope is in focus. If I remove a CCD camera from a 'scope and replace it with an SLR I have to refocus only for the purpose of moving the SLR's detector surface to the same distance from the back of the telescope as that of the CCD. Davoud -- Don't re-elect the past. Vote for the futu Obama in 2008! usenet *at* davidillig dawt com |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 04:38:09 GMT, Davoud wrote:
To me this is obviously true, but I need it confirmed or refuted: for any given optical train behind a telescope the focal distance -- the distance to a CCD or other flat electronic detector -- must always be the same if the telescope is in focus. If I remove a CCD camera from a 'scope and replace it with an SLR I have to refocus only for the purpose of moving the SLR's detector surface to the same distance from the back of the telescope as that of the CCD. What you are saying seems so obvious that I'm not positive just what it is you are asking g. If I understand correctly, however, then I'd agree with what you are saying. It's a bit confusing, though, to talk about "focusing", because that can mean different things with different optics. For example, many SCTs are focused by adjusting the spacing between their primary and secondary mirrors; in that case, the distance to the focal plane with respect to the rear port is not fixed. But with a rigid optical system, where focusing just means positioning an imager so it is aligned with the focal plane, your assessment that seems (obviously) correct. You could, for example, construct a set of parfocalizing rings so that different imaging devices could be swapped in and out with no need to ever refocus the instrument (in theory, anyway; in practice I doubt many scopes are mechanically stable enough to be entirely focus-free). _________________________________________________ Chris L Peterson Cloudbait Observatory http://www.cloudbait.com |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 29, 9:38*pm, Davoud wrote:
To me this is obviously true, but I need it confirmed or refuted: for any given optical train behind a telescope the focal distance -- the distance to a CCD or other flat electronic detector -- must always be the same if the telescope is in focus. If I remove a CCD camera from a 'scope and replace it with an SLR I have to refocus only for the purpose of moving the SLR's detector surface to the same distance from the back of the telescope as that of the CCD. Davoud Hi That is true but there is a problem. The normal focal point of an optical telescope is about the end of the focuser when at about mid point in adjustment. The CCD is about 1 inch inside of the camera. This means the focuser needs to adjust enough to compensate for the camera mount plus the depth of the mounting of the CCD in the camera. This is one of the reason that SCT are often used for camera work. The focal point can be moved over a long range. One could also use a Barlow but that also significantly changes the effective magnification of the telescope. Not that the focuser on a SCT doesn't change the magnification, just that it is a smaller percentage change for the same amount of change in focal position. Dwight |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Davoud wrote:
To me this is obviously true, but I need it confirmed or refuted: for any given optical train behind a telescope the focal distance -- the distance to a CCD or other flat electronic detector -- must always be the same if the telescope is in focus. If I remove a CCD camera from a 'scope and replace it with an SLR I have to refocus only for the purpose of moving the SLR's detector surface to the same distance from the back of the telescope as that of the CCD. Differences between the detectors is likely to cause grief with this as well as manufacturing tolerances. As an example... the coverslip of the CCD detector on an SBIG camera is going to move the focus. And you should also be aware that the faster the optical system the more critical this small amount is going to be. Are you trying to avoid having to refocus ? Personally I think you'd have much better results with a knife edge focuser set up to match the DSLR. Or if your focuser is precise enough you could measure the difference between the two cameras and then just use that difference as an offset. Bill |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
PST and F6.3 focal reducer | MAT[_2_] | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | October 17th 07 08:09 PM |
OPT focal reducers? | Art Millen | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | July 19th 07 01:58 AM |
Focal Reducer | Ian Piper | UK Astronomy | 1 | May 23rd 04 05:34 PM |
Scope focal length vs Eyepiece focal length | PS Surfer | Misc | 2 | September 23rd 03 12:57 AM |
6" or 8" and what focal ratio? | andrew | Misc | 12 | September 19th 03 08:19 AM |