![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 5/18/08 9:30 AM Zanthius brightened our day with:
http://www.archania.org/entanglement...ng_gravity.jpg Why are you cross-posting links to goofball, junk, new-age websites in science newsgroups. Keep your childish fantasies in the ridiculous consciousness newsgroups. If you're looking for some validation, stick with the rest of the nut-jobs. -- Steve --Inglo-- |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 19, 12:30*am, Zanthius wrote:
http://www.archania.org/entanglement...ng_gravity.jpg nice picture. north isn't up its a convention i like to see australia on top... its whacky but i keep my world map the southside up and try to think like that. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 19, 3:08*am, dead wrote:
On May 19, 12:30*am, Zanthius wrote: http://www.archania.org/entanglement...ng_gravity.jpg nice picture. north isn't up its a convention i like to see australia on top... its whacky but i keep my world map the southside up and try to think like that. Correctedit! http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=2e53vqd&s=3 ![]() |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 18 Mai, 20:34, LymanAlpha ioo@??.żżż wrote:
Why are you cross-posting links to goofball, junk, new-age websites in science newsgroups. Keep your childish fantasies in the ridiculous consciousness newsgroups. If you're looking for some validation, stick with the rest of the nut-jobs.. It would be more advantageous if you could give me criticism, after all, I learn more in that way.. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 19, 3:20*am, dead wrote:
On May 19, 3:08*am, dead wrote: On May 19, 12:30*am, Zanthius wrote: http://www.archania.org/entanglement...ng_gravity.jpg nice picture. north isn't up its a convention i like to see australia on top... its whacky but i keep my world map the southside up and try to think like that. Correctedit!http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=2e53vqd&s=3:) ass end of the world my ass...pfft our shire is changing to join with busselton and cowaranup and AMRTA is going to be BUMUP... seriously. what to say, the mystic light house has gone that way ! |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 18 Mai, 20:34, LymanAlpha ioo@??.żżż wrote:
If you're looking for some validation, stick with the rest of the nut-jobs.. Tell me why substances have gravity when they have anti-particles, but if substances are converted into photons they lose their gravity! Isn't it quite strange that only particles with anti-particles have any gravity? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dear Zanthius:
"Zanthius" wrote in message ... On 18 Mai, 20:34, LymanAlpha ioo@??.żżż wrote: If you're looking for some validation, stick with the rest of the nut-jobs. Tell me why substances have gravity when they have anti-particles, but if substances are converted into photons they lose their gravity! Photons have anti-particles (other photons). Systems of photons (that means more than one photon) have rest mass (in their center of momentum frame). Photons contribute to gravitation. Isn't it quite strange that only particles with anti-particles have any gravity? Isn't it quite strange that any particle has an anti-particle? I suppose that would apply to gravitons too... David A. Smith |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 19, 4:19*am, Zanthius wrote:
On 18 Mai, 20:34, LymanAlpha ioo@??.żżż wrote: If you're looking for some validation, stick with the rest of the nut-jobs. Tell me why substances have gravity when they have anti-particles, but if substances are converted into photons they lose their gravity! Isn't it quite strange that only particles with anti-particles have any gravity? wha.. microwaved pastie? **** i forgot all abou tit. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 18 Mai, 22:26, "N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)" wrote:
Photons have anti-particles (other photons). Systems of photons (that means more than one photon) have rest mass (in their center of momentum frame). Photons contribute to gravitation. Really? I didn't know. So the if the entire solar system was converted into photons, it would contribute just as much to gravitation as it does now? Isn't it quite strange that any particle has an anti-particle? I suppose that would apply to gravitons too... David A. Smith If gravitons exist, I am sure the anti-gravitons would be in the gravitational field of the anti-matter. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
How do they compare - good small mirror and average large mirror? | [email protected] | Amateur Astronomy | 16 | June 26th 06 06:38 PM |
Steward Observatory Mirror Lab Awarded Contact For Large Synoptic Survey Telescope Mirror | [email protected] | Misc | 0 | January 11th 05 10:07 PM |
Steward Observatory Mirror Lab Awarded Contact For Large Synoptic Survey Telescope Mirror | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | January 11th 05 10:07 PM |
UA Mirror Lab to Cast First Mirror for Giant Magellan Telescope | [email protected] | Misc | 0 | December 13th 04 09:01 PM |
This poor Questar! Nice mirror mouldy mirror | RichA | Amateur Astronomy | 1 | November 7th 04 08:06 AM |