![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dear Colleagues,
I am pleased to announce that the IAU FITS Working Group has unanimously approved the draft 3.0 version of the FITS Standard as the new official version of this document (pending 1 further clarification, described below). This new version of the document contains numerous updates and clarifications that reflect the evolution of the FITS format since the previous version of the Standard was approved in 1999. One notable addition is a new section on world coordinate systems that summarizes the conventions defined in 3 separate WCS papers that were published in 2002 and 2006. The current draft of this new document is available on the FITS Support Office web site at http://fits.gsfc.nasa.gov/fits_draft.html. The final version of the new FITS Standard document will be made available on the FITS Support Office web site as soon as one remaining issue that was raised during the final review of the document is resolved: several of the IAU FITS Working Group members felt that the definition of the CRPIXj WCS keyword should be clarified to state that the numbering of the pixels along each axis in a FITS image runs from 1 to N and not 0 to N-1. This has apparently been a source of confusion to some FITS users, and could cause the coordinate system that is defined in some FITS images to have an erroneous 1 pixel offset. A set of 3 small revisions to the wording of the WCS section of the Standard has been proposed to resolve this issue, as shown below. Please review this proposed change, and reply here with any further comments or suggestions you may have. Regards, Bill Pence, on behalf of the IAU FITS Working Group ================================================== =========== The following changes to the wording of the new FITS Standard document have been proposed to clarify the use of the CRPIXj keyword. The current version of this document is available at http://fits.gsfc.nasa.gov/fits_draft.html. 1) Insert the following paragraph at the start of Sect. 8.1: Rather than store world coordinates separately for each datum (e.g. as is done for random groups data), the regular lattice structure of a FITS image offers the possibility of defining rules for computing world coordinates at each point. As stated in Sect. 3.3.2 and depicted in Fig. 3.1, image array data are addressed via {\em integral array indices} that range in value from 1 to NAXISj on axis j. Recognizing that image data values may have an extent, for example an angular separation, spectral channel width or time span, and thus that it may make sense to interpolate between them, these integral array indices may be generalized to floating-point {\em pixel coordinates}. Integral pixel coordinate values coincide with the corresponding array indices, while fractional pixel coordinate values lie between array indices and thus imply interpolation. Pixel coordinate values are defined at all points within the image lattice and outside it (except along {\em conventional} axes, see Sect. 8.5). They form the basis of the world coordinate formalism in FITS depicted schematically in Fig. 8.1. 2) Remove the italics from "pixel coordinates" on p75 (they are used in the first mention above). 3) Change the definition of CRPIXj on p77 to: CRPIXj - [floating-point, indexed, default: 0.0] Location of the reference point in the image for axis j, in units of pixels, corresponding to $r_j$ in Eq. (8.1). Note that the reference point may lie outside the image and that the first pixel in the image has pixel coordinates $(1.0, 1.0, \ldots)$. -- __________________________________________________ __________________ Dr. William Pence NASA/GSFC Code 662 HEASARC +1-301-286-4599 (voice) Greenbelt MD 20771 +1-301-286-1684 (fax) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[fitsbits] Proposed Changes to the FITS Standard | William Pence | FITS | 0 | October 9th 07 08:41 PM |
[fitsbits] Proposed Changes to the FITS Standard | Preben Grosbol | FITS | 59 | August 25th 07 05:01 PM |
[fitsbits] Proposed Changes to the FITS Standard | Steve Allen | FITS | 0 | August 20th 07 04:47 AM |
[fitsbits] Proposed Changes to the FITS Standard | Rob Seaman | FITS | 0 | July 24th 07 07:21 PM |
[fitsbits] IAU-FWG approval of 64-bit integers in FITS | William Pence | FITS | 0 | December 8th 05 09:46 PM |