Chiral gravity of the Solar system

Aleksandr Timofeev wrote:

Please, excuse me, I repost this message the third time with abridged
edition.
[snip]

This spewing moron is wholly independent of

http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/eotvos.htm

It is obvious to anybody mildly competent in physics that there are
axial and polar vectors. A non-relativistic spinning system (angular
momentum) has helicity not chirality. Newtonian gravitation requires
parity invariant conservative forces. General Relativity models
gravitation as a parity invariant rank-2 tensor.

as for Timofeev,
http://w0rli.home.att.net/youare.swf

--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
"Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?" The Net!

Aleksandr Timofeev wrote:

Uncle Al wrote in message ...
[Snip delirium]
It is obvious to anybody mildly competent in physics that there are
axial and polar vectors. A non-relativistic spinning system (angular
momentum) has helicity not chirality. Newtonian gravitation requires
parity invariant conservative forces. General Relativity models
gravitation as a parity invariant rank-2 tensor.


as for Bunchy Al,

Since including values of masses of planets your different so-called
' SYSTEMS of Astrodynamic FUNDAMENTAL CONSTANTS and Parameters ' "
are completely arbitrary " in different CELESTIAL MECHANICAL THEORIES,
my " choice of 'Magic Ratios of UNPARALLELED CLASS linear combinations
of triples nearest planetary system masses ' is _always_ relevant."
[snip]

If empirical reality says you are an ass, then you are an empirical
ass.

http://w0rli.home.att.net/youare.swf
http://www.you-moron.com/

http://www.apa.org/journals/psp/psp7761121.html
http://insti.physics.sunysb.edu/~siegel/quack.html
http://www.firehead.org/~jessh/film/kubrick/Kubrick-Psycho.html
http://www.naturalchild.com/elliott_barker/prisons.html

--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
"Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?" The Net!