I'd never thought I'd think this: WE NEVER WENT TO THE MOON!

(Freeza Frost) wrote in message ...
the only reason they'd fake the landing is if the us wasn't ready to go
and their ego wanted them to be ahead of the russians. otherwise, why
fake it?

Because the whole space-programm is fake

www.geocities.com/markpeeters96/a.html

"bart janssens" wrote ...
(Freeza Frost) wrote in message ...
the only reason they'd fake the landing is if the us wasn't ready to go
and their ego wanted them to be ahead of the russians. otherwise, why
fake it?

Because the whole space-programm is fake

www.geocities.com/markpeeters96/a.html

Gee, question 4 is fun. I'm still clicking, waiting for argument 10 of 10 ... ;-)

"Paul Blay" wrote ...
www.geocities.com/markpeeters96/a.html

Gee, question 4 is fun. I'm still clicking, waiting for argument 10 of 10 ... ;-)

Argument 1 : There is NO SCIENTIFIC PROOF about this.
Argument 2 : There is NO SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATION about this
Argument 3 : There is NO PUBLIC DEMONSTRATION about this
Argument 4 : There is NO SCIENTIFIC INFORMATION about this
Argument 5 : There is NO WAY you can BE VERY SURE about this
Argument 6 : There is NO PERSON in your environment that has EVER experienced this
Argument 7 : There is NO publication of a higher velocity than 600km/hr AT SEA-level
NOT for a TGV, NOT for formule-one-CAR...
Argument 8 :The hearing of a "boom" is NO PROOF of reaching 1200km/hr
Argument 9 : An eye-witness on TV is as much reliable as the claim of
WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION IN IRAK

No argument 10. What a pity - I was just about to be convinced but then it
stops short.

You've got to admire his vice-like grip on logic - he never lets it excape onto his page.

(Although as he's writing in some mythical language none of it counts anyway).

On Mon, 2 Feb 2004 15:02:38 -0000, "Paul Blay"
wrote:

"Paul Blay" wrote ...
www.geocities.com/markpeeters96/a.html

Gee, question 4 is fun. I'm still clicking, waiting for argument 10 of 10 ... ;-)

Argument 1 : There is NO SCIENTIFIC PROOF about this.
Argument 2 : There is NO SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATION about this
Argument 3 : There is NO PUBLIC DEMONSTRATION about this
Argument 4 : There is NO SCIENTIFIC INFORMATION about this
Argument 5 : There is NO WAY you can BE VERY SURE about this
Argument 6 : There is NO PERSON in your environment that has EVER experienced this
Argument 7 : There is NO publication of a higher velocity than 600km/hr AT SEA-level
NOT for a TGV, NOT for formule-one-CAR...
Argument 8 :The hearing of a "boom" is NO PROOF of reaching 1200km/hr
Argument 9 : An eye-witness on TV is as much reliable as the claim of
WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION IN IRAK

No argument 10. What a pity - I was just about to be convinced but then it
stops short.

You've got to admire his vice-like grip on logic - he never lets it excape onto his page.

(Although as he's writing in some mythical language none of it counts anyway).

Have you been to some of the other pages? This one is good...

http://www.geocities.com/markpeeters96/z001.html

Cheers,
Richard

"Richard Stewart" wrote ...

Have you been to some of the other pages? This one is good...

http://www.geocities.com/markpeeters96/z001.html

Yeah, a complete copy of
http://www.skepticreport.com/mystics/cannonball.htm
bar the images.

No entry in
http://www.crank.net/space.html
yet? (That site should have a search button ...)

bart janssens wrote:
(Freeza Frost) wrote in message ...

the only reason they'd fake the landing is if the us wasn't ready to go
and their ego wanted them to be ahead of the russians. otherwise, why
fake it?


Because the whole space-programm is fake

www.geocities.com/markpeeters96/a.html

It has a certain understated stupidity.

Brett

Paul Blay wrote:

"Richard Stewart" wrote ...

Have you been to some of the other pages? This one is good...

http://www.geocities.com/markpeeters96/z001.html

Yeah, a complete copy of
http://www.skepticreport.com/mystics/cannonball.htm
bar the images.

No entry in
http://www.crank.net/space.html
yet? (That site should have a search button ...)

Heh... a certifiable loon for sure...

loonmode=onI'm gonna put up my website soon, where I'll bet my life that
3+3 = 8 - no-one can prove me wrong, it's not written in a scientific
journal, so therefore I'm right... and also that 3+3=8 at sea level at
supersonic speed.../loonmode

:-)

Cheers,
Richard