A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Others » Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

NASA Going back to the Future



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 7th 07, 09:12 PM posted to alt.astronomy
G=EMC^2 Glazier[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10,860
Default NASA Going back to the Future

They are training right now astronauts in Colorado to learn how to walk
and test their space suits so they would be ready to land on the Moon.
If it was not so sad it would be funny. It only shows what a giant step
backwards the shuttles,are,and I'll throw in that pink elephant the ISS.
If after all these 40 wasted years of shuttle flights it comes down to
this reality. Nasa does not have a space ship or rocket power to go to
the Moon. Logically NASAwould have to build the Saturn V again,but they
don't have the brain power of the Satern V engineers, They **** in
their pants when they saw that 36 story rocket. Told us the shuttle was
better. It had wings Oh Ya I remember it well. Bert

  #2  
Old October 7th 07, 09:29 PM posted to alt.astronomy
yahoo
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1
Default NASA Going back to the Future

G=EMC^2 Glazier wrote:
They are training right now astronauts in Colorado to learn how to walk
and test their space suits so they would be ready to land on the Moon.
If it was not so sad it would be funny. It only shows what a giant step
backwards the shuttles,are,and I'll throw in that pink elephant the ISS.
If after all these 40 wasted years of shuttle flights it comes down to
this reality. Nasa does not have a space ship or rocket power to go to
the Moon. Logically NASAwould have to build the Saturn V again,but they
don't have the brain power of the Satern V engineers, They **** in
their pants when they saw that 36 story rocket. Told us the shuttle was
better. It had wings Oh Ya I remember it well. Bert

Haha, Funny but yes, SAD
  #3  
Old October 7th 07, 10:26 PM posted to alt.astronomy
Double-A[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,516
Default NASA Going back to the Future

On Oct 7, 1:12 pm, (G=EMC^2 Glazier) wrote:
They are training right now astronauts in Colorado to learn how to walk
and test their space suits so they would be ready to land on the Moon.
If it was not so sad it would be funny. It only shows what a giant step
backwards the shuttles,are,and I'll throw in that pink elephant the ISS.
If after all these 40 wasted years of shuttle flights it comes down to
this reality. Nasa does not have a space ship or rocket power to go to
the Moon. Logically NASAwould have to build the Saturn V again,but they
don't have the brain power of the Satern V engineers, They **** in
their pants when they saw that 36 story rocket. Told us the shuttle was
better. It had wings Oh Ya I remember it well. Bert



Perhaps NASA astronauts can hitch a ride on one of India's boosters.
They are scheduling a Moon probe launch for next year.

Double-A


  #4  
Old October 9th 07, 12:26 PM posted to alt.astronomy
G=EMC^2 Glazier[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10,860
Default NASA Going back to the Future

Double-A Since I keep saying shuttle Mafia NASA paid $25,000,000 for
each of the shuttle toilets this begs the question. How much did a
Saturn V space craft toilet costs? I think it cost $35 bucks and they
used the savings for an escape vehicle that could save the astronauts in
case of an explosion. Mafia shuttle NASA only had a firemen pole. If
not so sad it would be funny Bert

  #5  
Old October 9th 07, 01:44 PM posted to alt.astronomy
Double-A[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,516
Default NASA Going back to the Future

On Oct 9, 4:26 am, (G=EMC^2 Glazier) wrote:
Double-A Since I keep saying shuttle Mafia NASA paid $25,000,000 for
each of the shuttle toilets this begs the question. How much did a
Saturn V space craft toilet costs? I think it cost $35 bucks and they
used the savings for an escape vehicle that could save the astronauts in
case of an explosion. Mafia shuttle NASA only had a firemen pole. If
not so sad it would be funny Bert



The early space flight astronauts probably had leg bags for No. 1, and
ate only highly concentrated, low bulk food tablets so they wouldn't
have to go No. 2. Saved them $25,000,000!

Double-A




  #6  
Old October 9th 07, 04:47 PM posted to alt.astronomy
G=EMC^2 Glazier[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10,860
Default NASA Going back to the Future

Double-A for $25,000,000 I would gladly go in a leg bag for the rest of
my life. "once upon a time" not having a nickel made me acutely aware
that the Mafia was in the toilet business. Bert

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Back to the Future!!! Saul Levy Misc 1 September 10th 05 09:38 PM
Lockmart's CEV-----back to the future? Ray S Space Shuttle 46 May 10th 05 11:41 PM
Turning Back Our Future Jim Burns Policy 1 February 23rd 05 04:49 AM
Back to the Future? The Command Module Flies Again? Rusty B Policy 280 February 7th 04 06:49 AM
Back to the Future? The Command Module Flies Again? Rusty B History 234 February 7th 04 02:59 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:20 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.