![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My own idea is universes are exactly the same right down to their number
of electrons. Should that no be reality I have to go with that some universes that are different have the structure of all iron atoms bert |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "G=EMC^2 Glazier" wrote in message ... My own idea is universes are exactly the same right down to their number of electrons. Should that no be reality I have to go with that some universes that are different have the structure of all iron atoms bert Hellooo Beeeert, What makes you think there is more than one Universe ?? Iron is only produced in supernovas, as are all the other heavy metals, so a universe with ONLY iron atoms is quite impossible. Pop a top again, Beert. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hagar (Horrible) Iron is very stable. Iron also stops fusion. You are
coming on to strong |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It depends on ones definition of "universe"
1) if we say the universe is everything, there can be no "twin universe" multiple universes or whatever you will call it everything will also include other dimensions, everything means everything! 2) if we say the universe are a part of cosmos, yes you can have more than 1 universe so you need to make a decision, otherwise you speek nonsens "G=EMC^2 Glazier" skrev i en meddelelse ... My own idea is universes are exactly the same right down to their number of electrons. Should that no be reality I have to go with that some universes that are different have the structure of all iron atoms bert |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Starman Universes in the cosmos is the way to go.(best terminology)
There are more universes in the cosmos than flakes of snow in an endless storm.Like snow flakes each has its own spacetime(time frame) All have the exact same structure. All share and contribute to the gravitation of the intrinsic gravity.of space. Someday this gravity will be the key to letting us know they are out there. Just like black holes gravity is the big clue they are out there. bert |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 24, 3:36 am, (G=EMC^2 Glazier) wrote:
Starman Universes in the cosmos is the way to go.(best terminology) There are more universes in the cosmos than flakes of snow in an endless storm.Like snow flakes each has its own spacetime(time frame) All have the exact same structure. All share and contribute to the gravitation of the intrinsic gravity.of space. Someday this gravity will be the key to letting us know they are out there. Just like black holes gravity is the big clue they are out there. bert Bert, if there were endless universes, and they all contributed gravity, we would all be flatter than pancakes, or stretched out like spaghetti! Double-A |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "G=EMC^2 Glazier" wrote in message ... Starman Universes in the cosmos is the way to go.(best terminology) There are more universes in the cosmos than flakes of snow in an endless storm.Like snow flakes each has its own spacetime(time frame) All have the exact same structure. All share and contribute to the gravitation of the intrinsic gravity.of space. Someday this gravity will be the key to letting us know they are out there. Just like black holes gravity is the big clue they are out there. bert Beeeert, I don't mean to give you a hard time, but what evidence spawns your idea that there are "unlimited" universes, all of them identical ?? We cannot even see the edge of our present universe, since we are limited by the light-gathering ability of even the most modern telescopes. We can discern structures that are approximately 10B years old, but anything beyond that is conjecture, at best. One guess is that the universe is 13.7 B years old, but that is a fickle number, since we don't know at what point the universe started to speed up its expansion and if it is linear or exponential. A fraction of a variance can make a difference of huge proportions. The smallest composite particle we know of is the atom. Our solar system can be likened to an atom, the Sun is the nucleus and the thingies zipping around it are the planets (electrons). The Galaxy is the same on a much grander scale, the BH at its center is the nucleus and all the solar systems in orbit around it are the "electrons". On a larger scale yet, there are the Galaxy clusters, then the visible universe, but it all is in circular motion, but basically a mass, orbiting a nucleus. Present day technology limits us to the atom in the microcosm and the Universe in the macro world, but there is nothing that forbids it to go on forever, in both directions, sort of like Mandelbrot fractals, which in theory have no beginning or end. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Double-A Great distances between them. Gravity obeys the inverse square
law. I relate that to being the same as light. Best to keep in mind there would be no night sky if light did not obey the inverse square law. There are over 6 trillion stars out there,and its pretty dark in the Earth's shadow. bert |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hagar (not so horrible) best to keep in mind nature deals in very large
numbers. I could say more universes than electrons,but snow flakes we can visualize,and they are flat turn,and so very symmetrical (also white) To think because we can't see other universes they don't exist is very naive thinking. Your wrong we can not compare our solar system to an atom. Hagar study some QM. You are right imperial thinkers are guessing the age of the universe to be about 15 billion years old. My guess that irs 22 billion years old is better because its age is showing it to be older with every year. Even if we don't try to look further out,the Earth is being hit by photons from a greater and greater distance. Best to keep in mind each year is another light year bert |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "G=EMC^2 Glazier" wrote in message ... : Hagar (not so horrible) best to keep in mind nature deals in very large : numbers. I could say more universes than electrons,but snow flakes we : can visualize,and they are flat turn,and so very symmetrical (also : white) To think because we can't see other universes they don't exist : is very naive thinking. Your wrong we can not compare our solar system : to an atom. Hagar study some QM. You are right imperial thinkers are : guessing the age of the universe to be about 15 billion years old. My : guess that irs 22 billion years old is better because its age is showing : it to be older with every year. Even if we don't try to look further : out,the Earth is being hit by photons from a greater and greater : distance. Best to keep in mind each year is another light year bert : Hey Bert?, "Check out this universe!!!..." COlOnel Jake Enterprises® Presents "The Inner Life of a Cell" http://www.coloneljake.com/BAM1BAM/BV2007/ -- High Speed Internet Connection http://www.coloneljake.com/pages/page200/ Dialup Internet Connection http://www.coloneljake.com/pages/page201/ ¸,.,¸ :And then some... `^'^´ |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Space inflates,and Structures get Smaller ?? | G=EMC^2 Glazier[_1_] | Misc | 0 | May 19th 07 12:49 PM |
Evidence of Artificial Structures on the Moon? Sleuths | Mad Scientist | Misc | 36 | August 27th 04 12:16 AM |
Pointers to Engineering of Orbital Structures | G Banting | Policy | 11 | July 19th 04 12:28 PM |
Mars Soil Spongin - Threaded Structures | Thomas Lee Elifritz | Astronomy Misc | 1 | February 27th 04 08:30 PM |
Seeing Sameness In Structures | G=EMC^2 Glazier | Misc | 2 | September 3rd 03 01:13 PM |