View Single Post
  #5  
Old November 3rd 15, 11:13 AM posted to sci.space.station
Jeff Findley[_6_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,307
Default Space X and their rocket malfunction

In article om,
says...

On 2015-11-01 04:39, Brian-Gaff wrote:
Its gone very quiet on this front recently. Did they find the issue and take
steps to be sure it never happened again?



I don't have the link but on Friday, NASA released the report on the
Antares failure at Wallops. Basically failed turbopump in one engine
that caused it to explode and rest exploded. Range safety was activated
to help reduce damage, but still destroyed the launch pad.



That's what you get when you use 40+ year old Russian engines that no
one in the US truly understands. This was truly penny wise, but pound
foolish.

Next one will b on Delta 4 and after that, they plan on using newer
generation of russian engines.


Atlas V. Delta IV costs too damn much and is being phased out by ULA.

Jeff
--
"the perennial claim that hypersonic airbreathing propulsion would
magically make space launch cheaper is nonsense -- LOX is much cheaper
than advanced airbreathing engines, and so are the tanks to put it in
and the extra thrust to carry it." - Henry Spencer