On Jan 3, 1:13*pm, BradGuth wrote:
On Dec 24 2009, 6:58*pm, BradGuth wrote:


On Dec 24, 11:35*am, Nightcrawler wrote:

On 12/24/2009 1:21 PM, BradGuth wrote:

Your perpetual obfuscation and systematic policy of denial is noted..

Your inability to follow a thought and abject refusal to accept
reality is noted.

At least I believe in those regular laws of physics that are not
conditional, politically correct nor faith-based approved.

Can you explain how the Newtonian laws of gravity do not apply in this
case?

Are you suggesting that something other than gravity has those Kuiper
belt and TNO asteroids, plus scads of Oort zone Items hanging around
(including Sedna and at least a few thousand others)?

Tell us how we're supposedly not the least bit tidal associated with
Sirius.

Do you have some new and improved formula for gravity?

*~ BG

There was once upon a time a great deal of gravitational tidal
association between our wussy little passive solar system of 2e30 kg,
and that of the nearby original 25e30 kg Sirius star/solar system.

Before then we had that pesky nearby molecular cloud of star and
planet making stuff (mostly hydrogen and helium) worth 12.5e6 Ms to
contend with, as nearly on top or along side of our solar system.

Didn't those physics Newtonian laws of gravity exist way back then
(roughly 250300e6 years ago)?

Didn't Sirius(B) go nova not so terribly long ago (perhaps 65e6 years
BP of not more recent).

Isn't human evolution of only a few million years? (at most 300
million years according to Ed Conrad and his independent teams of
fossilized human remain and related research, while others suggest
only a few tens of millions, and some faith-based interpretations
giving our complex species only a few ten thousands)

~ BG