View Single Post
  #48  
Old November 9th 08, 04:47 PM posted to alt.astronomy
BradGuth
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 21,544
Default Before, TreBert said nothing could slow down light.

On Nov 9, 7:12 am, oldcoot wrote:
On Nov 8, 8:42 pm, "Painius" wrote:

When are they going to accept
the obvious truth that space is a high-grade vibrating
energy of such tight and tiny wavelengths that it appears
tremendously "particle-like"? Very much like a river, it
flows into matter. And causes gravity. Where's the beef?


Why are these learnèd people such freakin' wussies?!


Their biggest and most recurring objection seems to be the 'roach
motel' issue, i.e., "where does the stuff go once it's injested
through the atomic nucleus?" Because the FS model does not directly
address this issue, they declare the model invalid. In that case,
their Big Bang model is likewise invalid, and for the same reason. It
does not address where the stuff 'comes from'. Yet they have no
problem accepting the BB.


It takes faith in order to so devoutly believe in the singular BB.


It stands to reason that whatever strange,
inverted, nonlocal realm the stuff "goes to" in the process of
gravitation is the same 'ground state' where it's repressurized and
"comes from" in the Big Bang process. Gravitation and the BB comprize
a natural dipole sharing a common 'ground state'. To view the process
of gravitation is to view *quite literally* the reverse of the BB
process, the Continuous Big Bang. Or Big Bloom if you will. :-)


How about the BCI (big cosmic implosion), or the BGF (big god fart)?

~ BG