View Single Post
  #28  
Old June 17th 07, 12:01 AM posted to sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,sci.physics.cond-matter,sci.philosophy.tech,sci.astro
Dono
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 270
Default GETTING RID OF EINSTEIN RELATIVITY

On Jun 8, 5:42 am, sean wrote:
On 7 Jun, 13:13, "Jeckyl" wrote:

"Pentcho Valev" wrote in message


roups.com...


There is ONLY ONE FUNDAMENTAL ERROR in Einstein's relativity:
Einstein's principle of constancy of the speed of light:


Why is the constancy of the speed of light an error?


http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/"...light is
always propagated in empty space with a definite velocity c which is
independent of the state of motion of the emitting body"


is FALSE.


Its not been observed as false .. its been observed as true. Seehttp://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/SR/experiments.html


Do you have experiemental evidence to the contrary?


Michaelson- Morley.
In this experiment light is emitted at c relative to the emitting
body.
Proof is that if light were not emitted at c relative to the emitting
body then the observations would have shown that on one path the light
would be travelling at a different speed than the other. This isnt
observed. So the only scientific and logical conclusion one can make
is that MMx shows us that light is emitted at c relative to the source
in all directions. Something you as a relativista illogically refuse
to accept.
Seanwww.gammarayburst.com
For proof that sagnac and MM cannot be explained by the creationist
style theory
of SR see sagnac simulations at...http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=jaymoseleygrb




Nonsense, you don't even begin to understand the explanation to the
Sagnac experiment. I gave you a couple of links, try reading on it
before posting crap.