Conjecture on Baez's 'Quasar without a host galaxy'
"Jonathan Silverlight" wrote in message
...
In message , oriel36
writes
.....
Proper motions of stars are pre-galactic notions besides they contain
elements of the celestial sphere in position descriptions of external
galaxies.
Could someone translate this into standard English?
It's not easy but I'll give it a go:
a) So-called "proper motions" of stars are actually
an illusion caused by rotation of the Milky Way.
b) The Earth rotates through 360 degrees in a solar
day, not a sidereal day as astronomers think,
therefore the concept of right ascension as a
means of documenting the location of stars is
flawed.
As for the rest, your guess is as good as mine.
George
|