Thread
:
SpaceX Capsule Explosion
View Single Post
#
29
July 20th 19, 01:40 PM posted to sci.space.policy
Jeff Findley[_6_]
external usenet poster
Posts: 2,307
SpaceX Capsule Explosion
In article ,
lid says...
On 19-07-19 14:06 , Jeff Findley wrote:
In article , says...
I couldn't find a definitive reference. But the abort system is simply
not needed for a cargo flight. It could be that the parts will still be
on the Dragon 2, but the abort system's propellant tanks and high
pressure helium tanks simply won't be filled. That would also save a
lot of mass while minimizing the modifications needed to turn a crew
Dragon 2 into a cargo Dragon 2.
They might even use propulsive landing for cargo flights.
No, they won't. NASA has definitively nixed that idea. NASA does not
want irreplaceable returning cargo (e.g. EMU suits) splattered all over
a concrete landing pad when the inevitable "oopsie" happens.
NASA is requiring SpaceX to parachute all Dragon 2 capsules into the
ocean.
Jeff
--
All opinions posted by me on Usenet News are mine, and mine alone.
These posts do not reflect the opinions of my family, friends,
employer, or any organization that I am a member of.
Jeff Findley[_6_]
View Public Profile
View message headers
Find all posts by Jeff Findley[_6_]
Find all threads started by Jeff Findley[_6_]