On Feb/10/2020 at 08:47, wrote :
Il giorno lunedì 10 febbraio 2020 13:12:03 UTC+1, Jeff Findley ha scritto:
In article ,
says...
The violation of the principle of action and reaction necessarily involves the redefinition of the I and II principle of dynamics ... ..
inertia law is no longer a uniform rectilinear motion and F = m*a it is no longer the same.

What do I mean? That you can get out of Newtonian mechanics and build other spaceships that reach the rocky planets light years away.

Spaceships that need kilopower nuclear reactors.
But first I have to defend the F432 patent and demonstrate the PNN to a NASA that is deaf and wastes time with missiles.
Who among you can contact one of NASA who comes to see PNN tests?

Unfortunately, the PNN is incredible, but it's another world


Off to the bozo bin for you (a.k.a. the killfile).

I think you are unable to read even the translator
http://www.asps.it/pat98.jpg



Jeff

I can read (write, understand and speak) Italian. Though my Italian is
far from perfect, it is good enough that in my opinion even if Jeff
could read the "translator" it wouldn't change your position in his
killfile.

No one at NASA is going to go see you PNN test. It is you who must prove
that you have an interesting technology. NASA is not going to go see
every demonstration that anyone wants them to see. Having a patent does
not prove the validity or usefulness of your contraption. If you think
that you can violate the basic principles of physics, you have to
clearly state what are the new laws of physics. Then you have prove with
strong evidence that you can produce thrust in a way that the current
laws of physics can't explain and that your new laws of physics can
explain. Keep in mind that if your force is small there are numerous
things that can give very small forces such as heating one side of your
contraption more than the other, emitting photons in one direction...

If you don't have the equations of the new laws of Non-Newtonian physics
then you have to be able to do something useful with your contraption.
If you can cheaply make a car move with your contraption you might be
able to get away with saying I don't know how it works but it does. But
saying that you have something that would work in space but can't push a
car on Earth and you can't say what are the laws of physics that explain
why it would work in space will just put you in more killfiles.


Alain Fournier