On Dec 29, 5:21*pm, Fred J. McCall wrote:
bob haller wrote:
On Dec 29, 2:57*pm, Fred J. McCall wrote:
bob haller wrote:
On Dec 29, 2:08*pm, Fred J. McCall wrote:
bob haller wrote:
Your claim was YOU CANNOT *EARN ENOUGH MONEY IN SEVERAL LIFETIMES TO
PAY THE COST PER POUND *LAUNCH COSTS OF NASA FOR A HUMAN BEING.

fred since nasa has no human launcher, and only a new vague plan for a
human launch vehicle in the far future, that will not cut shuttle
costs....

so again i am correct.

the only way the US can launch a human being is by soyuz at err 63
million each.

In other words, you engaged in deliberately lying hyperbole, got
caught on it, and are now wriggling madly to change "NASA cost per
pound" to "Russian passenger price".

fred you are as usual being intentionally ignorant.

currently nasa has no manned space capability

the replacement would have shaken so badly the astronauts spleens
would of liquified, besides it cost too much

the latest nasa plan would cost way too much, and take forever to get
operational

the falcon if successful might make it affordable.

In other words, you engaged in deliberately lying hyperbole about
"NASA cost per pound" and "several lifetimes of earnings", got caught
on it, and are now wriggling madly to change "NASA cost per pound" to
"Russian passenger price".

show me a nasa estimated cost per pound to loft a human.......

Cost per pound is cost per pound. *Once more time. *In other words,
you engaged in deliberately lying hyperbole about "NASA cost per
pound" and "several lifetimes of earnings", got caught on it, and are
now wriggling madly to change "NASA cost per pound" to "Russian
passenger price".

--
"False words are not only evil in themselves, but they infect the
*soul with evil."
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * -- Socrates- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

cost per pound freight is far less than cost per pound human and in
any case provide a link to nasa estimated human costs to orbit.....