"Hägar" wrote in message
...

"Bast" wrote in message news
Hägar wrote:
"Bast" wrote in message news
Hägar wrote:
"Bast" wrote in message news
Hägar wrote:
Did yet another of Russia's fine Nuclear Plants give up the
ghost and the utter silence of the Russkies speaks in
volumes ??? Crickets from the Kremlin ... as expected.

https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-...t-farther-east

Their Nuclear Plants are deteriorating, their Nuclear Subs
are sinking (Kursk) and these clowns want to be takeb
seriously ...


I have to wonder how credible this story is, if the release was last
month and it is only making news now.
Seriously,....after Chernobyl, every country has sensors set up and is
monitoring the air for radiation daily.

However,...you forget that the US nuclear plants are just as old, and
most are already well beyond their original planned obsolescence date.
Mostly because all the libertards won't let them build newer, safer,
replacement reactors.....so we are stuck with the old ones that are
ticking time bombs ready to break down.


*** I'll excuse your ignorance when it comes to Nuclear Power Plants,
since you obvious don't know **** from shinola. The older Chernobyl
versions of Soviet Nukes didn't have an impact proof reactor
containment structure. Hence, when they blew, it spread. We don't
have any of that type. Or early ones were designed to withstand the
impact of a fully loaded 747, probably in anticipation of 911 like
events. So, perhaps the next time you open your big yap, read up on the
topic
at hand.


Uhhh Right,....just like Three Mile island,......perfectly safe with no
radiaton leakage at all.
Or how about all the leaks from Indian Point just outside of NYC ?
Both those plants are hopelessly outdated and still running, despite
both were only designed to last in the 1990's

You don't need to worry about something crashing INTO a nuclear
plant,....you have to worry about the stuff inside crashing OUT.

Before you keep proving that you are more ignorant than democrat sky
screamers,.....you better remember that nothing crashed into Chernobyl,
or Fukushima
....Just like nothing crashed into WTC 7 on 9/11,.....but the results
were total destuction from within, in both cases.
Sorry if that little fact doesn't fit your narrative.


But hey,...what do I know.
Why not watch a video about the newer nuclear technology that seems to
have eluded you up to now.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eDCEjWNGv6Y

A least if you can keep your head out of your ass for an hour to watch
it.
And quit reading government reports,....they still say that hitlery is
as innocent as a spring lamb.



*** The difference is that when we have an event at a Nuke, there is
an investigation and apropos measures are taken to eliminate a
repeat in the future. If it is too slipshod, we close it down (see
Rancho Seco, California). There are 100s more people killed in
airplane accidents than there were at Three Mile Island ... it is
hyperventilating ****s like yourself that, with false indignity, blow
everything out of proportion, which, BTW, is also the hallmark of a
****ing Liberal. If you are afraid of getting fried by a Nuke, how about a
outrage
against automobiles, which kill thousands every year, or knives, od
hammers, or railroad crossings, or ****ed off wives, or incompetent
doctors ....
but nooo ... Nuke owners usually have deep pockets and greed reigns
supreme with you damn snowflakes.


You sure argue like a snowflake.
Never once adressing ANY of my points, just going off on a LA-LA-LA tirade
of overused regurgitated talking points.

I said that nuke plants never have leaks or meltdowns because of plane
attacks.
And that they are just too old, and literally falling apart.
But no one wants to shut down the obsolete ones, and build far safer ones
right next door.

*** and once again your total ignorance is mind boggling. The reason
Nukes are so expensive is because the labor unions run the place. Trust
me, I've worked in them and I know. Something that is estimated to cost
about 800 M (million) winds up over budget to the tune of 4 B (billion).
So, after taking it up the pooper on the first one, nobody wants a repeat
right next door, no matter how modern.

And you can whine about my "talking points" all you want, the fact
remains that Nuclear plants are any bit as safe as any other mode of
electricity generation, but like in airplane crashes, if one goes, it
creates a lot of collateral damage. But you little ****-ants, who see
the Bushies behind 911, Trump in cahoots with the Russkies and Al
"massage with happy ending" Gore as the shining salvation of
humanity. Perhaps you need to attend the Liberals' howling gatherings
and bay at the Moon at midnight.



You went off on a tangent about banning cars knives doctors and od(sic)
hammers.
Although I noticed you missed "trucks of peace"

GOD,...it makes me feel so good when I don't have to talk about Trump and
then agree with you.
......BEING ON YOUR SIDE IN ANY ARGUMENT, SCARES THE **** OUT OF ME.

***You have to forgive Hagar. His electrical engineering duties surrounded
sorting batteries into piles (e.g. AAA AA A C D 9V, etc.) He never read
much about economics or he would understand that new nuke plants are not the
least expensive means to produce electricity. Utilities have and obligation
to their customers and investors. Notwithstanding wailing and mashing of
teeth from whomever would produces a nuke plant and rightard ****weasles ,
utilities and turning from coal and nuke to natural gas and renewables. Not
a US phenomenon. I understand Hagar converted his prize 1977 Vega to a coal
powered steam engine and he heats his trailer with a pot bellied stove
filled with cow patties.