In article 057e8f40-73be-4e2c-bc3e-
, says...

On Sep 21, 11:57*am, wrote:
"Newly declassified details of the analysis
behind the U.S. Air Force's decision to opt
for a next-generation Reusable Booster
System (RBS) reveal a long-term preference
for a rocket-based, combined-cycle upper-
stage orbiter over the nearer-term expendable
solution."

See:

http://www.military.com/features/0,15240,220472,00.html

I have proposed a highly reusable booster system as well.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/31261680/Etdhlrlv-Addendum
http://www.scribd.com/doc/30943696/ETDHLRLV
http://www.scribd.com/doc/35439593/S...-Satellite-GEO

Yet another thread-jacking by you? You're worse than my dog begging for
attention...

Jeff
--
The only decision you'll have to make is
Who goes in after the snake in the morning?