someone wrote:
On May 15, 1:06 pm, wrote:I see
that the Luminet Team was in error and the Plutonium Atom Totality was
correct all along
with a 6 faced Cosmos as a 6 lobed figure.

speaking of which, what has happened with your double-slit single
nipple model?

"Matching Circles" would have all 6 lobes the same and allow a focused
concentration on the one lobe containing the Milky Way. Each lobe is
one electron
and the 5f6 is the last 6 electrons of 231Pu. Each lobe has a nipple
end closest
to the nucleus. And each lobe grows its galaxies as a double-slit
Dirac Radioactivity.

But one has to wonder where the other Electrons of a Plutonium Atom
Totality
stack up. What about the s and p and d and f orbitals. Are they hidden
in
nodes which we are forbidden to see? Is the Observable Universe
just the last electron of 5f6 or is it the last 6 electrons? A hint of
that answer was
in the last decade of the 20th century when Sandage found stars of 20
billion years
old and Freedman later found the age of the Cosmos as a mere 7 to 9
billion years
old. So there ensued a clash because they undermined the Big Bang, and
so Sandage
fudged his work to climb down from 20 billion years to that of around
14 and Freedman
was coerced to move up from 7 billion to that of 14 so that the Big
Bang community
could restore its dignity continue with their fake theory.

The data cannot be fudged or lied about, in that the Observable
Universe has layered ages
of stars older than the newest lobe of the Atom Totality. Because we
can see 20 billion year
old stars in a nearby lobe while the Milky Way lobe is only 7 billion
years old means that
we can observe at least two different electrons which are in two
different lobes of the 5f6 of 231Pu.

As the Atom Totality answers many old questions, a flood of new
questions
come in.

Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies