The nonsense of the 'big bang' is based on a geometric absurdity of singularities which are way to express nothing in a long winded way but also extended to 'black hole' hype without giving physical considerations as to what is being asserted.

Infinite density/zero volume equates to infinite volume/zero density so although the former may entertain mathematicians who have spent 3 centuries doing a number on geometry, they hinder genuine geometric investigations such as pre-supernova and post-supernova evolution.

The mathematics of those stellar rings is founded on the principle that there is no lower or upper limit to geometry and physical considerations. I found that the non-periodic arithmetic of the Pi proportion extended to the more creative Phi proportion in terms of non-periodic tiling patterns which prohibit a disturbance between order and disorder for a loss of one is a loss of the other. The same happens with volume/density ratios so the drastic option of having one disappear at the expense of the other creates the mindnumbing physical conclusion that infinite volume/zero density has the same meaningless standing as infinite density/zero volume.

If people retreat from blanket 'big bang/black hole' conclusions and start to consider stellar processes in a more productive light then some semblance of physical considerations will return to research. People do sense that supernova events may be transitional phases in stellar evolution which may create a solar system rather than just an explosion where the star dies for this frees up so much information about galactic evolution.