View Single Post
  #2  
Old April 23rd 13, 05:47 AM posted to sci.physics,sci.astro,sci.math,sci.physics.electromag
Archimedes Plutonium[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 858
Default Experiment: creating gravity lock Chapt16.15 EM-gravity #1311 NewPhysics #1514 ATOM TOTALITY 5th ed

Experiment: human-made gravity lock

Now this idea of a minimal mass to have gravity lock as seen by the
asteroids Ida and Dactyl, showing us that neither Newtonian gravity
nor General Relativity are true theories of science invokes some
experiments to be performed. Where we go into outer space and imagine
trying to get a gravitational bonded or bounded or lock. The science
literature is poor in terminology of gravity-bounded. The Moon is
gravitationally locked to Earth. The Earth is gravitationally locked
to the Sun. But if EM-gravity is true, there is a minimum set of
conditions in order to have gravity-lock. I mean there must be enough
mass to form a gravity cell of Space, so that Space rotates about an
axis and this spinning causes the locked object to go around in a
closed loop of the main gravity object. That is how you can have a
Dactyl speeding along at a meager 10meters/sec while it is locked to
Ida speeding along at 25km/sec. That is why you have the Sun speeding
along at 220km/sec while Earth, locked to the Sun is going a leisurely
29km/sec.

So in Newtonian gravity or General Relativity, there is no limitations
on gravity lock, but in EM-gravity we must have a mass of at least
10^16kg in order to have enough magnetic monopoles to build a Space
gravity cell that spins on its axis and drags along other objects in
the region of the cell. This would explain why you would have two
asteroids both 10^16 kg moving in parallel and near one another yet
not gravitationally locked, because the gravity cell of one spins
opposite to the gravity cell of the other.

So here is an experiment which may be conducted, but which I suspect
has already been unwittingly carried out without our knowing it. I
mean a spacecraft that releases a object and whether the object
becomes gravitationally locked with the spacecraft. So that in the
prior missions of spacewalk where a tool is released, whether the tool
becomes gravitationally bound to the spacecraft. According to either
Newtonian gravity or General Relativity, the tool should become
gravitationally locked, until the spacecraft fires the engines and
moves away. But, according to EM-gravity, the minimum condition of a
10^16 kg mass is not present to form a spinning Space gravity cell for
the tool to orbit around.

Now it would have been neat if Voyager 1 or 2 had been outfitted with
a small object that can be monitored on Earth and released in its far
off journey and see if it will revolve around the spacecraft as
gravity lock.

--

Approximately 90 percent of AP's posts are missing in the Google
newsgroups author search starting May 2012. They call it indexing; I
call it censor discrimination. Whatever the case, what is needed now
is for science newsgroups like sci.physics, sci.chem, sci.bio,
sci.geo.geology, sci.med, sci.paleontology, sci.astro,
sci.physics.electromag to
be hosted by a University the same as what
Drexel
University hosts sci.math as the Math Forum. Science needs to
be in education
not in the hands of corporations chasing after the
next dollar bill. Only Drexel's Math Forum has done a excellent,
simple and fair author- archiving of AP sci.math posts since May 2012
as seen here :

http://mathforum.org/kb/profile.jspa?userID=499986

Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies