On Sep 3, 5:02 pm, Alan Anderson wrote:
[I'm not sure who wrote this. It was oddly quoted, with two people's
names attached to it. The spelling suggests it was Einar, however.]

I´m just going to to you explane the kind of idiocy Frad McCall was
perpetrating against me.

Remember the logical fallacy of proving a negative?

An example of that fallacy is namelly the folloing:

A has not been observed.
Therefore A does not exist.

When he told me that EU does not allow anyone ellse carbon trate,
nobody ellse is doing that. That was the same as the abow argument.

There's a real difference between "A has not been observed" and "Lack of
A has been observed."

I conclute now, that following my experience in arguing with him, that
Fred McCall is with high probability an idiot.

Fred is no idiot. It is a near-certainty that he is very intelligent,
and extremely likely that he is well informed on many topics.

He is, however, a fool. I mean that not as an insult but as a
compliment, as I believe he plays the role well.

I think you mean egotistical fool.

Being well informed by itself doesn't put food on the table. By Fred's
own desire for wealth, Britney Spears is his superior.

Eric