On Jan 10, 10:07 am, Mahipal wrote:
On Jan 3, 6:07 pm, Koobee Wublee wrote:
paul andersen wrote:
“Given two hypotheses where each is an antithesis to and thus
invalidates the other, common sense says one must find experiments to
validate only one of these hypotheses.”
KW, you can never teach the willfully blind to see a rainbow.
You are very correct. The little professor from Norway, paul
andersen, thought that was a fumble and urged the sperm lover to haul
it away. shrug
The exact episode is like the children’s story “Blind men and the
elephant”. Apparently, paul is too busy chasing chickens near the
Arctic Circle that he lost the meaning of what scientific method is.
Gee! You can even take hints from children’s story books.
Ahahahaha...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blind_Men_and_the_Elephant
Your argument are as lethal as always.
You bet. shrug
Only an idiot would write what Paul did.
Now, you are getting the picture of how shallow-minded this person
is. shrug
For example, you proved me wrong when I in this paper:
http://www.gethome.no/paulba/pdf/LTconsistent.pdf
thought it was possible to set three clocks to zero
at the instant when they were co-located:
http://tinyurl.com/34dv5p8
On page 3 right below Figure 2, you have
delta = (delta_A – blah blah blah) / sqrt(1 – B^2)
Where
** B^2 = v^2 / c^2
That's my favorite equation of all time! Just love it.
It is full of mathematical contradictions if one is smart enough to
see where they are. shrug
It can easily be
Delta_A = (delta – blah blah blah) / sqrt(1 – B^2)
The bottom line is the equation describing the segment of Minkowski
spacetime using your labeling system:
** c^2 dt_AC^2 – ds_AC^2 = c^2 dt_BC^2 – ds_BC^2
Where
** ds^2 = dx^2 + dy^2 + dz^2
The equation can be written as follows.
** dt_AC^2 (1 – B_AC^2) = dt_BC^2 (1 – B_BC^2)
Where
** B_AC c = Speed of C as observed by A
** B_BC c = Speed of C as observed by B
From A’s point of view trying to compare the rate of time flows with
C, B and C are the same. Thus, the equation above simplifies into the
following.
** dt_AB^2 (1 – B_AB^2) = dt_BB^2 (1 – B_BB^2) = dt_BB^2
Where
** B_AB c = Speed of B as observed by A
** B_BB c = 0
On the other hand, from C’s pint of view observing A, B and A are the
same. Thus, the spacetime equation has to be interpreted differently
as the following.
** dt_AA^2 (1 – B_AA^2) = dt_BA^2 (1 – B_BA^2) = dt_AA^2
Where
** B_AA c = 0
** B_BA c = Speed of A as observed by B
The only time when there is no paradox is when (B_AB = B_BA = 0).
This is what the Lorentz symmetry is all about such that there is no
special treatment on the one that is moving, and the little professor
from Norway fails miserably on this one. SPANK SPANK SPANK
It is time for paul to join another paul aka sylvia, absolute dick,
little bitch, etc. better known as PD for another divine vision to
resolve the paradox --- projection of proper time. Tom used to
believe in that crap, but he is now back to the first divine vision
promoted by promoted by Olivia Newton-John’s grandfather, Max Born.
shrug
Nice connection! ONJ and Born. "Have you never been mellow, have you
never tried, to find the comfort, from inside..." try Dan Singh with
QT's VV of Travolta fame. Sorry, I had one of those greasy free
thought moments.
Have you seen Koobee Wublee’s Relativity Play where Born was singing
that same song?
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...37c8836abe60ac
Actually KW, I was searching for your recent Zardoz reference, and
instead, found beautiful Born Olivia. Still perusing threads...
Zardoz was an interesting movie.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zardoz
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0070948
By far, the best part about that movie was Charlotte Rampling.
shrug
KW... never be intimidated by they-the-them ganging up on you.
Thanks for the encouragement. No, Koobee Wublee would not be bullied
by any of these idiots. shrug
Best regards.