On Sep 4, 10:21 am, Pentcho Valev wrote:
Paul Davies establishes Forever Special Relativity by using an
extremely original approach:

http://www.prospect-magazine.co.uk/a...ls.php?id=5538
Paul Davies: "The "c" here stands for the speed oflight. It is one of
the most fundamental of the basic constants of physics. Or is it? In
recent years a few maverick scientists have claimed that the speed oflightmight not be constant at all. Shock, horror! Does this mean the
next Great Revolution in Science is just around the corner?"

Initially people do feel shock and horror (after all, Paul Davies is a
great time traveller) and wait but no Great Revolution in Science
comes from around the corner. Then people go and see and find there is
no Great Revolution in Science around the corner. Just "a few maverick
scientists" taking away the money they have been given for finding a
solution to the fundamental problem: "How can Einstein's light postulate be violated without violating it?". Finally, people decide
to pay no attention to any "maverick scientists" who claim Einstein's light postulate is false. So Special Relativity becomes Forever
Special relativity.

More from a hypnotist in Einstein criminal cult who, together with
John Stachel, seems to be the original discoverer of Forever Special
Relativity (that is, a Special Relativity independent of the falsehood
of Einstein's second (light) postulate):

http://o.castera.free.fr/pdf/onemorederivation.pdf
Jean-Marc Levy-Leblond: "This is the point of view from wich I intend
to criticize the overemphasized role of the speed of light in the
foundations of the special relativity, and to propose an approach to
these foundations that dispenses with the hypothesis of the invariance
of c....We believe that special relativity at the present time stands
as a universal theory discribing the structure of a common space-time
arena in which all fundamental processes take place....The evidence of
the nonzero mass of the photon would not, as such, shake in any way
the validity of the special relalivity. It would, however, nullify all
its derivations which are based on the invariance of the photon
velocity."

The last statement will be referred to some day as THE MOST INCREDIBLE
OXYMORON ever produced in Einstein's era so it makes sense to show it
once mo

JEAN-MARC LEVY-LEBLOND: "The evidence of the nonzero mass of the
photon would not, as such, shake in any way the validity of the
special relalivity. It would, however, nullify all its derivations
which are based on the invariance of the photon velocity."

Pentcho Valev