View Single Post
  #1  
Old December 26th 15, 06:55 PM
JAAKKO KURHI JAAKKO KURHI is offline
Member
 
First recorded activity by SpaceBanter: Apr 2013
Posts: 40
Default The condition of the matter in the black hole as specified by science:

“The black hole is made up of highly compressed matter, even the light cannot escape.”
The ways an atom is constructed don’t work well in technical aspect because the atom is structurally weak to take any externally applied pressure. Let us leave the light issue as is and concentrate on how much pressure the atomic construction can take. The structurally weak construction of an atom is due to orbiting electrons, specifically the long distances from the nucleus to orbiting electrons, makes electrons subject to collapse way before extreme pressure is applied. The reason for collapsing electrons is, because the pull force from the nucleus and the orbiting force of electrons has to be in balance (equilibrium) in order to make an atomic orbiting system feasible. So it takes small amounts of compressing energy to throw electrons off from their orbits, thus forces are out of balance and electrons are pulled into the nucleus. So the nucleus has gained .01% into its mass, and this total mass from an atom isn’t further compressible regardless the strength of applicable forces within the black hole. Therefore, the large size of the black hole in the milky way galaxy is made up of these collapsed atoms, which are physically incompressible in volume, thus the total mass has to be much larger in size and weight than previously calculated compressible atomic mass. In conclusion, the primeval masses contend of the black hole in one galaxy doesn’t fit into one big atom or a marble ball size object, which is said to be a source for all matter in the universe. Furthermore, redefining an atomic mass as compressible into infinite, does not resolve the electron’s collapsing issue. Is there explanation to this disparity?