Thread: Antares
View Single Post
  #6  
Old April 5th 13, 09:13 AM posted to sci.space.station
Brian Gaff
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,312
Default Antares

Ah yes I thought that was the one. Well talking of old icbm bits kind of
makes you wonder if these had to be called on to launch a strike how many
would have actually worked correctly!

Brian

--
From the Sofa of Brian Gaff Reply address is active
"Greg (Strider) Moore" wrote in message
m...
"Jeff Findley" wrote in message
...

In article ,
says...

"Brian Gaff" wrote in message ...

So though I wish Orbital well, their track record for trouble free
first
launches is not great. Lets hope this one is an exception!


Incidentally what was that launch vehicle called in the 90s that
launched
from the same site but blew up leaving a couple of out of control
solids
racing upward? I believe it was cancelled shortly after that failure.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conestoga_(rocket)

Is this the one you're thinking of?


Clusters of solids with low payload to orbit. Not my idea of low cost,
especially once the "surplus" Minuteman stages are all gone.


Yeah, notice how successful they were. :-)


Jeff


--
Greg D. Moore
http://greenmountainsoftware.wordpress.com/
CEO QuiCR: Quick, Crowdsourced Responses. http://www.quicr.net