View Single Post
  #153  
Old December 24th 06, 07:13 PM posted to sci.math,sci.physics,sci.astro
a_plutonium[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 194
Default whether Sloan Great Wall and Great Wall are contiguous This Logical Check or Test lack of applying logic in physics theory Experiment to prove that the force of gravity does not exist in the nucleus of atoms; either emission or decay


a_plutonium wrote:
(snipped)
http://cfa-www.harvard.edu/~huchra/zcat/



Well I have taken the liberty of quoting what Wikipedia says about the
Great Wall:
--- quoting Wikipedia on Great Wall ---
Great Wall (astronomy)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

This article is about the CfA2 Great Wall. For the Sloan Great Wall,
see Sloan Great Wall

The Great Wall, sometimes more specifically referred to as the CfA2
Great Wall, is the second largest known super-structure in the
Universe. It is a filament of galaxies approximately 200 million
light-years away and has dimensions which measure over 500 million
light-years long, 300 million light-years wide and only 15 million
light-years thick. It was discovered in 1989 by Margaret Geller and
John Huchra based on redshift survey data from the CfA Redshift
Survey[1].

It is not known how much further the wall extends due to the plane of
the Milky Way galaxy in which Earth is located. The gas and dust from
the Milky Way obscures astronomers' view and have so far made it
impossible to determine if the wall ends or continues on further than
they can currently observe.

It is hypothesized that such structures as the Great Wall form along
and follow web-like strings of dark matter. It is thought that this
dark matter dictates the structure of the Universe on the grandest of
scales. Dark matter gravitationally attracts normal matter, and it is
this normal matter that astronomers see forming long thin walls of
Super-Galactic clusters.

The largest known cosmic structure is the Sloan Great Wall, discovered
in 2003 in data from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey; it is about a
billion light-years away, and about 1.4 billion light-years in length.
--- end quoting ---

This maybe crucial to the Atom Totality theory as to whether the Sloan
Great Wall is contiguous to the Great Wall. For the Atom Totality would
say the dots of the electron-dot-cloud, the galaxies, are dense near
the nucleus and become sparse and rare the further away you go. So if
the Atom Totality theory is correct then you cannot have say density of
galaxies punctuated with spans of sparseness. A dense number of
galaxies near the nucleus and a uniform sparsing and rarity to the
galactic numbers the further away from the nucleus.

Now I cannot tell from the readings above whether the Sloan Great Wall
is nearby the Great Wall. It does say that the Sloan Great Wall is a
billion light years away whereas the Great Wall is 200 million light
years away. So that is in agreement with the Atom Totality theory.

Also, I want to point out that the 5f6 orbital of plutonium has various
solutions to the Schrodinger Equation where there is a sort of picture
of the 6 lobes and a sort of steering wheel type geometry near the
nucleus of a node which would appear like a "void of galaxies". So it
could be that the Sloan Great Wall is interior to these node of the 5f6
and the Great Wall is exterior to this node.

It would be nice if someone created a 3-d model of what Huchra and
Geller cataloged. These 2-d models are better than nothing but leave a
lot to be desired.


My explanation above was not clear. So let me try to make clear to
those who never saw a chemistry textbook of the dot cloud pattern of an
electron.

The p and d and f orbital of an electron is dense dots near the nucleus
of the atom and those dots become thinner the further away one goes
from the nucleus.

Now observational astronomy of the Sloan Great Wall and the other Great
Wall quoted above from Wikipedia would be an example of "dense dots".
These two walls would then imply that the NUCLEUS of the ATOM TOTALITY
is in the direction of those two walls.

But for the Atom Totality theory to be true, then the density of the
Sloan Great Wall and Great Wall have to be continuous, given the
exception that perhaps a node of the 5f6 is not between the Sloan Great
Wall and the Great Wall.

And the Wikipedia above says that "gas and dust from the Milky Way
obscures". So we may have a suspended judgement or evaluation of
whether the Atom Totality theory is supported or denied versus the Big
Bang theory.

By the way, the Big Bang theory would not have a pattern of increased
thinness or sparseness of matter from the center of the explosion of
the Big Bang, but rather the Great Wall and Sloan Great Wall would be
at a far distance from the explosion itself. So the Atom Totality
theory predicts high density from the Nucleus with increasing thinness
with increasing distance, whereas the Big Bang predicts thinness from
the "center" (nucleus in Atom Totality) and a dense wad further out
from the center.

So the density of galaxies is able to trashcann one of these two
competing theories-- Big Bang or Atom Totality.

So far the Huchra and Geller cataloging are supporting the Atom
Totality theory because the Sloan Great Wall is 1 billion light years
away and the Great Wall is 200 million light years away. That leaves us
with 800 million light years of Space that is obscured by our own Milky
Way Galaxy.

If the Big Bang were true then the Sloan Great Wall and the Great Wall
would be disconnected and would be opposite the *center* of the
explosion. If the Atom Totality were true then the Sloan Great Wall and
Great Wall would be near the Nucleus (center) and would be continuous
of the Sloan Great Wall and Great Wall and that with increasing
distance from the Sloan Great Wall the density of galaxies decreases.

So far the Atom Totality is being supported and the Big Bang is looking
sick and fake.

Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies