On Wed, 13 Dec 2017 09:27:14 -0500, "Bast"
wrote:



Sarah Ehrett wrote:
On Tue, 12 Dec 2017 20:02:46 -0500, "Bast"
wrote:



Sarah Ehrett wrote:
On Tue, 12 Dec 2017 06:47:47 -0500, "Bast"
wrote:



Sarah Ehrett wrote:


So you

Are still waiting for you to refute the evidence of radio intercepts
being logged to and from the surface of the moon. Six times. Six
missions landed on the moon, Bastie.


So your story still goes.

Still waiting for you to refute the evidence of radio intercepts
being logged to and from the surface of the moon. Six times. Six
missions landed on the moon, Bastie.

But no actual proof.

I provided proof, Bastie. It is not my fault you are too stupid to
find it in the thread and read it.

Still waiting for you to refute the evidence of radio intercepts
being logged to and from the surface of the moon. Six times. Six
missions landed on the moon, Bastie.


You only provided a vague referrence to something that only you, would
consider "proof"

Keep lying, Bastie. These are still in the thread.

Message-ID:
Message-ID:


You convinnced no one, that Apollo and NASA was/is not a massive money
sucking lie.

I don't need to convince anyone of the truth. There are thousands of
verifiable and scientific proof on the web. You're simply to stupid
to find them and too dumb to understand what they say. Not my
problem.


Now my proof again.

Still waiting for you to refute the evidence of radio intercepts
being logged to and from the surface of the moon. Six times. Six
missions landed on the moon, Bastie.