On Sunday, December 2, 2018 at 1:29:24 PM UTC-8, Double-A wrote:
On Saturday, December 1, 2018 at 3:24:21 PM UTC-8, Herbert Glazier wrote:
On Saturday, December 1, 2018 at 11:20:27 AM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote:
I just realized that
how 'they' measure the
age of the universe is
done incorrectly.

1) by looking for the oldest star


I don't see how they can look for the
oldest star since stars existed trillions
of years before the big bang.

2) and back to the big bang


measuring stars from a
big bang is not how you measure
the universe since stars existed Before
the big bang.



I mean like WOW, you people got everything wrong, haven't you?



On Saturday, December 1, 2018 at 11:20:27 AM UTC-8, The Starmaker wrote:
I just realized that
how 'they' measure the
age of the universe is
done incorrectly.

1) by looking for the oldest star


I don't see how they can look for the
oldest star since stars existed trillions
of years before the big bang.

2) and back to the big bang


measuring stars from a
big bang is not how you measure
the universe since stars existed Before
the big bang.



I mean like WOW, you people got everything wrong, haven't you?

22 billion years and counting bert


Counting up to what? What is the maximum age of a universe? Without a big bang, these questions do not arise.

Double-A

The universe is now middle age.When humankind is dead its also the end for all that is.A universe that can not see itself is what I'm saying.Bert